The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
OrbisNonSufficit, SergLts, RusFrog, JanSorman, Icons
5654 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
6 registered members (Deacon Christopher, Utroque, Devin1890, moronikos, 2 invisible), 160 guests, and 175 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Byzantine Nebraska
Church of the Holy Trinity (UGCC) - Brazil
Papal Audience 10 November 2017
Upgraded Russian icon corner
Russian Greek Catholic Global Congress
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics34,865
Posts412,716
Members5,654
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Orthodox jurisdiction #191457 04/05/03 06:32 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 197
Westerner Gone East Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 197
On a website listing monasteries in America, I came across a jurisdiction I have never before heard of, the "Holy Orthodox Church of North America." Is this body canonical, or is one of those "True Orthodox" groups? I was curious.
Not to be confused with the canonical Orthodox Church in America.

Re: Orthodox jurisdiction #191458 04/05/03 04:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
Axios Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
Non-canonical, my friend.

Axios

Re: Orthodox jurisdiction #191459 04/05/03 07:58 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
Mexican Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
The HOCNA is a non-canonical jurisdicion which separated from the ROCOR because it was too liberal!

It-s an ultra-conservative, traditionalist old calendarist, schismatic group which preaches that the EP is a Mason, that the Pope is the Antichrist, that sacraments outside HOCNA could be devoid of grace because of the Calendar stuff, and there are a lot of protestant converts there. They think they-re the only ones who posess thre absolute truth and the true Orthodox faith. eek

Re: Orthodox jurisdiction #191460 04/05/03 08:42 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 191
Jenny Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 191
Quote
Originally posted by Snoopy:
The HOCNA is a non-canonical jurisdicion which separated from the ROCOR because it was too liberal!

It-s an ultra-conservative, traditionalist old calendarist, schismatic group which preaches that the EP is a Mason, that the Pope is the Antichrist, that sacraments outside HOCNA could be devoid of grace because of the Calendar stuff, and there are a lot of protestant converts there. They think they-re the only ones who posess thre absolute truth and the true Orthodox faith. eek
Is the ROCOR non-canonical? I was thinking of going to an ROCOR church for Divine Liturgy tomorrow morning.

Jenny

Re: Orthodox jurisdiction #191461 04/05/03 11:04 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
Mexican Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
From what I know there's no reason to believe the ROCOR is a non-canonical Church in stricto sensu, since it's in communion with the Patriarchate of Jerusalem and the Church of Serbia, but its status is irregular.

After the Communist Revolution in Russia, part of the Russian Imperial clergy had to emigrate and formed a Synod in the exile. The exiled hierarchy thought that as the communists had taken control of the local hierarchy it was not possible to trust them anymore, so they did not recognize the appointment of Metropolitan Sergius as Patriarch in Russia.

The later leaders of the ROCOR took a way different and oposed to the idea of St. John Maximovitch and other Russian hierarchs in the exile and rejected all contacts with Western Christians and especially Ecumenism. At the beggining the exiled ROCOR Synod appeared as a reaction against the abuses of communism and communist infiltration in the Church, but later their rejection of Sergianism (coperation with Soviet State) became an excuse to avoid unity with World Orthodoxy. To them the Ecumenical Patriarchate has been infiltrated by freemasonry and heresy, and the rest of the Churches by Sergianism. They also departed from Orthodox teachings by re-baptizing Catholics and re-chrismating Orthodox from other jurisdictions) who join the ROCOR.

Through the Patriarchates of Serbia and Jerusalem there was a possibility of a mediation in order to re-incorporate the ROCOR to the rest of the canonical Patriarchates. The MP even accepted to recognize their autonomous hierarchy and to stay as a free church without any tides with the Russian Patriarchate in Moscow. However, the ROCOR hierarchy prefered to establish contacts with Old Calendarist and Traditionalist schismatic groups from Greece (the Synod of Metropolitan Cyprian of Oropos), Bulgaria, Romania and other smaller disident communities in European countries.

As well as some of the MP leaders cooperated with the Soviet Communist State, the exiled ROCOR hierarchy supported the interests of Russian aristocrats and defend a pink fairy tale image of the Russian Empire ignoring the abuses and cruelty of the Russian Czars.

Re: Orthodox jurisdiction #191462 04/06/03 01:15 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,540
Administrator Offline
John
Member
Offline
John
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,540
Quote
Originally posted by Jenny:
Is the ROCOR non-canonical? I was thinking of going to an ROCOR church for Divine Liturgy tomorrow morning.
Jenny,

Go. There are no problems with ROCOR. Snoopy’s explanation is good but the shorter version is that ROCOR separated from the Moscow Patriarchate because the MP was communist controlled and has never mended the rift. The issues are pretty complex. Within canonical Orthodoxy ROCOR is considered to be canonical but of irregular status because of the continuing rift.

See The Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia by Fr. Ron Roberson for more information.

Please tell us the details of your visit.

Admin

Re: Orthodox jurisdiction #191463 04/06/03 01:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
Axios Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
Jenny,

The situation between ROCOR and the rest of Orthodoxy is an internal matter. It should not trouble any Catholic from being a guest.

Axios

Re: Orthodox jurisdiction #191464 04/07/03 11:13 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 191
Jenny Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 191
Thanks to everyone for their replies. I did go. I'll start a new thread in order to post my thoughts and questions. smile

Re: Orthodox jurisdiction #191465 04/07/03 03:16 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,173
Orthodox Catholic Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,173
Dear Axios,

There are mainstream Orthodox Churches in Canada that require Chrismation in order to be received from ROCOR, is that not correct?

I as a Ukrainian Catholic can be received into the Constantinopolitan Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada via a simple confession and profession of the Orthodox faith.

Not so if I were from ROCOR!

And even if mainstream Orthodoxy does recognize the "irregular canonicity" of ROCOR - ROCOR simply recognizes much of world Orthodoxy as "irregular" period, does it not?

If communion is not reciprocated, it is no communion in fact, according to Orthodox ecclesiology - correct?

Alex

Re: Orthodox jurisdiction #191466 04/07/03 04:06 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461
Diak Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461
I think I disagree with the ROCOR issue as an "internal matter". With issues of excommunication and sacraments, these are also visible "external" signs of communion and unity.


The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2020 (Forum 1998-2020). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3