Cavaradossi, Roman Interloper, ftbond, NitaMacdonald1930, SOL, etomaria, Kostyantyn, Benny, Ivanov325, DocH, andria, Joe Smith, CanuckK8, AJG80, gzt
4464 Registered Users |
|
|
17 registered (Anthony, davinpa, Carson Daniel, Padraig, Peter J, Sbdn. John, JDC, Garajotsi, StuartK, JLF, Pavloosh, Ot'ets Nastoiatel', DMD, John Schweich, 3 invisible),
190
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
4464 Members
26 Forums
30148 Topics
373649 Posts
Max Online: 1087 @ 07/16/07 01:09 PM
|
|
|
#218500 - 01/03/07 12:41 AM
Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures
|
Member
Registered: 11/07/01
Posts: 5485
Loc: Joliet, Illinois
|
Our good pope is leading the way in the struggle that really matters and is even more crucial that the struggle against Islam. Here's an excerpt.
Pope Benedict XVI, Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures, pp. 43-45.
Enlightenment philosophy has developed the belief that “…man ought not to imagine that he is different from all other living beings. And it follows that man ought not to be treated any differently from them.” (42-43)
“We asked two questions: whether the rationalistic (positivistic) philosophy is strictly rational, and therefore universally valid, and whether it is complete. Is it enough on its own? May, or indeed must, it abandon its historical roots to the sphere of that which can claim no more than a subjective validity? Our answer to all these questions must be an unambiguous No. This philosophy expresses, not the complete reason of man, but only part of it. And this mutilation of reason means that we cannot consider it to be rational at all. Hence, it is incomplete and can recover its health only through reestablishing contact with its roots. A tree without roots dries up…
In affirming this, we are not denying all the positive and important contributions of this philosophy. Rather, we are stating that it needs to be completed, since it is profoundly incomplete. And this brings us back to the two controversial points in the preamble to the European Constitution. The failure to mention Christian roots is not the expression of a superior tolerance that respects all cultures in the same way and chooses not to accord privileges to any one of them. Rather, it expresses the absolutization of a way of thinking and living that is radically opposed (inter alia) to all the other historical cultures of humanity. The real antagonism typical of today’s world is not that between diverse religious cultures; rather, it is the antagonism between the radical emancipation of man from God, from the roots of life, on the one hand, and the great religious cultures, on the other. If we come to experience a clash of cultures, this will not be due to a conflict between the great religions, which of course have always been at odds with one another but, nevertheless, have ultimately always understood how to coexist with one another. The coming clash will be between this radical emancipation of man and the great historical cultures. Accordingly, the refusal to refer to God in the Constitution is not the expression of a tolerance that wishes to protect the nontheistic religions and the dignity of atheists and agnostics; rather, it is the expression of a consciousness that would like to see God eradicated once and for all from the public life of humanity and shut up in the subjective sphere of cultural residues from the past. In this way, relativism, which is the starting point of this whole process, becomes a dogmatism that believes itself in possession of the definitive knowledge of human reason, with the right to consider everything else merely as a stage in human history that is basically obsolete and deserves to be relativized. In reality, this means that we have need of roots if we are to survive and that we must not lose sight of God if we do not want human dignity to disappear.”
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#218780 - 01/05/07 12:51 PM
Re: Christianity and the Crisis of Cultures
[Re: Carson Daniel]
|
Grateful
Member
Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 3446
Loc: Ohio, USA
|
And this brings us back to the two controversial points in the preamble to the European Constitution.
The failure to mention Christian roots is not the expression of a superior tolerance that respects all cultures in the same way and chooses not to accord privileges to any one of them.
Rather, it expresses the absolutization of a way of thinking and living that is radically opposed (inter alia) to all the other historical cultures of humanity.
The real antagonism typical of today's world is not that between diverse religious cultures; rather, it is the antagonism between the radical emancipation of man from God, from the roots of life, on the one hand, and the great religious cultures, on the other.
If we come to experience a clash of cultures, this will not be due to a conflict between the great religions, which of course have always been at odds with one another but, nevertheless, have ultimately always understood how to coexist with one another.
The coming clash will be between this radical emancipation of man and the great historical cultures.
Accordingly, the refusal to refer to God in the [European] Constitution is not the expression of a tolerance that wishes to protect the nontheistic religions and the dignity of atheists and agnostics; rather, it is the expression of a consciousness that would like to see God eradicated once and for all from the public life of humanity and shut up in the subjective sphere of cultural residues from the past.
In this way, relativism, which is the starting point of this whole process, becomes a dogmatism that believes itself in possession of the definitive knowledge of human reason, with the right to consider everything else merely as a stage in human history that is basically obsolete and deserves to be relativized.
In reality, this means that we have need of roots if we are to survive and that we must not lose sight of God if we do not want human dignity to disappear.
WOW !!! He knocked the ball clear out of the park! Superbly stated ! Kudos to you, Dan, for posting this ! WOW!!! This is the kind of stuff that should be shouted from the rooftops. By the way, how is the rest of the book? -- John
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|