Cavaradossi, Roman Interloper, ftbond, NitaMacdonald1930, SOL, etomaria, Kostyantyn, Benny, Ivanov325, DocH, andria, Joe Smith, CanuckK8, AJG80, gzt
4464 Registered Users |
|
|
15 registered (theophan, Anthony, davinpa, Carson Daniel, Padraig, Peter J, Sbdn. John, JDC, Garajotsi, StuartK, JLF, Pavloosh, 3 invisible),
201
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
4464 Members
26 Forums
30149 Topics
373652 Posts
Max Online: 1087 @ 07/16/07 01:09 PM
|
|
|
#345081 - 03/12/10 12:03 AM
Re: Joint Declaration - JPII and Bartholomew I about the Filioque
[Re: lm]
|
Member
Registered: 02/12/08
Posts: 139
Loc: VA
|
I recently discovered this three year old thread, and I thought I would bring it to the attention of those who may have missed it. A lot of constructive theological discussion takes place here. My compliments to those who participated in it.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#345116 - 03/12/10 11:12 AM
Re: Joint Declaration - JPII and Bartholomew I about the Filioque
[Re: Fr_Kimel]
|
Member
Registered: 08/19/08
Posts: 59
Loc: MISSOURI
|
We worship the Trinity, and the Trinity in unity...is it really worth it to wonder about procession, etc? I fail to see why the Church should be so torn about one word. Let us so work that the healing process can continue...so we mortals can enjoy what the Trinity already has...UNITY
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#345142 - 03/13/10 12:40 AM
Re: Joint Declaration - JPII and Bartholomew I about the Filioque
[Re: ALLEN]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 02/14/10
Posts: 2
Loc: Oregon, USA
|
Fr. Kimel,
Thank you for bringing our attention to this thread. It is helping me to get back into the swing of things theologically.
In Christ through Mary
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index