Newest Members
Cavaradossi, Roman Interloper, ftbond, NitaMacdonald1930, SOL, etomaria, Kostyantyn, Benny, Ivanov325, DocH, andria, Joe Smith, CanuckK8, AJG80, gzt
4464 Registered Users
Who's Online
12 registered (Irish Melkite, Peter J, Deacon El, ConstantineTG, danman916, Paul B, henrikhank, jjp, DTBrown, 3 invisible), 197 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Pascha Dublin 2012
Centennial of the Eparchy of Hajdudorog
Hierarchial Divine Liturgy at Holy Trinity Cathedral OCA SF
OLF: What a difference a day makes...
Easter Sunday - Pascha - Velik Den- St. Michael's, Binghamton,NY
Forum Stats
4464 Members
26 Forums
30150 Topics
373659 Posts

Max Online: 1087 @ 07/16/07 01:09 PM
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#221526 - 01/27/07 07:50 AM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: John K]
harmon3110 Offline
Grateful
Member

Registered: 08/03/04
Posts: 3446
Loc: Ohio, USA
Originally Posted By: John K
Originally Posted By: harmon3110
Originally Posted By: Memo Rodriguez
It is dangerous, at least. Not even us, Latins, have gone so far.

Shalom,
Memo



Some have: not in the Creed but during the Liturgy of the Eucharist in the Novus Ordo Mass. I have witnessed, several times, the language of the Liturgy changed in a very specific, heretical way. At a certain point, the people are supposed to say: “May the Lord accept the sacrifice at *your* hands, for the praise and glory of *His* Name, for our good and the good of all *His* Church.” Instead, I have heard the people recite it deliberately changed to this: “May the Lord accept the sacrifice at *our* hands, for the praise and glory of *God’s* Name, for our good and the good of all *God’s* Church.” It might seem to be a superficial change to sound more "inclusive." In reality, it denies the uniqueness of Christ's priesthood (in Himself, in history, and in His priests and bishops); and it denies the specificity of His revelation: God as Father, He as the only way, tuth and life to the Father, etc. That is heretical because it deliberately changes what the Christian religion has taught since Pentecost.



Isn't this the organic, bottom up liturgical change that we hear of so often? That the people start the change [ . . . ] ? crazy



Not exactly. The people leading this were (are) priests and nuns who prefer to wear lay clothes and (in the case of the priests) who sometimes prefer to sit with the laity. This change in liturgical language almost encapsulates their "vision" of Christianity -- you know: the Eucharist is a "verb" not a "thing", the Church is the "people", etc. It's almost a stealth operation, to "educate" the people by example. I've heard them talk like this. I wish I were making this up, but I'm not.

-- John


Edited by harmon3110 (01/27/07 07:55 AM)

Top
#221561 - 01/27/07 01:18 PM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: harmon3110]
Fr. Deacon Lance Offline
Moderator
Member

Registered: 08/29/98
Posts: 3811
Loc: Washington, PA
Fr. Elias,

Thank you for the correction. How many English translations are in use in Britain?

Fr. Deacon Lance
_________________________
My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.

Top
#221577 - 01/27/07 04:20 PM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: Fr. Deacon Lance]
Hieromonk Elias Offline
Administrator
Member

Registered: 03/04/03
Posts: 1746
Loc: Pennsylvania
I know of four or five.

the unworthy,
Elias

Top
#221578 - 01/27/07 04:23 PM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: Hieromonk Elias]
Hieromonk Elias Offline
Administrator
Member

Registered: 03/04/03
Posts: 1746
Loc: Pennsylvania
For English:
I. Hapgood is still in use.
The old one done for the Fellowship of Saints Alban and Sergius.
The new one done for the Sourozh diocese.
and Father Ephrem's.
I am not sure what all the new Antiochians are using?
There may be more.

Top
#221585 - 01/27/07 05:17 PM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: Hieromonk Elias]
rcguest Offline
Bill from Pgh
Member

Registered: 06/12/06
Posts: 712
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
To All,

Just a sidebar to this current thread.

I have deliberately stayed out of the discussions in this particular forum because I am a Latin Catholic. For some reason the Roman Church has been dragged in here so I would like to make note of the following link to the General Instuction of the Roman Missal:

http://www.nccbuscc.org/liturgy/current/revmissalisromanien.shtml

It is an excellent work and has everthing one needs to know about how the Roman Mass is to be celebrated.

In my fifty years as a Latin Catholic I have never once heard the creed recited any other way than using "for us men and for our salvation" nor have I ever once heard the "Orate,fratres" prayed any differently than it is supposed to be prayed. I don't deny that somewhere, someone may be doing things differently than stated in the GIRM but it is an abuse and definitely not common occurence or accepted form.

Yes, Pope Paul VI did recognize that "the smoke of Satan had entered the Church". I will go as far to say it has entered every Church on earth for Satan will not let the Church go on without a fight. The Roman Church is a big church and it will take some time for the smoke to clear, but God be praised the smoke is clearing!

In Christ,
Bill


Top
#221717 - 01/29/07 11:17 AM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: Maccabeus Rising]
Recluse Offline
Member

Registered: 12/15/05
Posts: 733
Loc: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted By: Maccabeus Rising
I am asking that we address the question whether dropping ANTHROPOUS from the Nicene creed in the new Ruthenian version is heretical.
This is the most disturbing revision of the liturgy. I do not know if it could be considered as heresy, but there is one thing I do know for sure. It is an intentional act to emasculate our Tradition.


Top
#221772 - 01/29/07 05:00 PM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: Recluse]
byzanTN Offline
Member

Registered: 06/25/02
Posts: 5223
Loc: Knoxville, TN
There is a traditional Catholic cantor in the RC church where I play, who has an interesting way of handling his dislike for the English translation of the creed. He brings a missal with him and recites the creed softly in Latin.

Top
#221782 - 01/29/07 07:03 PM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: byzanTN]
rcguest Offline
Bill from Pgh
Member

Registered: 06/12/06
Posts: 712
Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
Dear Charles,

The problem I have with Latin is except for the easy stuff I need to read the English to know what I'm praying in Latin. smile I only ask that the English be properly translated from the Latin.

And with thy spirit,
Bill

Top
#221789 - 01/29/07 08:44 PM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: rcguest]
byzanTN Offline
Member

Registered: 06/25/02
Posts: 5223
Loc: Knoxville, TN
I do understand that, since I am no Latin scholar either. However, if the English translations are giving some of our Byzantines problems, reading the creed in Greek or some language other than English might be a solution.


Edited by byzanTN (01/29/07 08:45 PM)

Top
#221798 - 01/29/07 10:16 PM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical [Re: byzanTN]
Wondering Offline
Member

Registered: 08/27/05
Posts: 1407
Loc: USA
You've hit upon a marvelous solution! For those priests and parishes where the creedal translation is a great burden of conscience, they can recite the creed in Slavonic and remain in the spirit as well as the letter of the law. Wonderful compromise!

PS I think that is worth its own thread to call attention to it. I'll start it.


Edited by Wondering (01/29/07 10:17 PM)

Top
#221934 - 01/31/07 12:15 PM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: Maccabeus Rising]
Recluse Offline
Member

Registered: 12/15/05
Posts: 733
Loc: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted By: Maccabeus Rising
I will begin. It seems to me that to change “for us men and our salvation” to “for us and our salvation” is presumptively heretical.

Council of Ephesus (Third Ecumenical), convened by Emperor Theodosius II, presided over by Pope St. Cyril of Alexandria, and attended by more than 200 fathers. It condemns Nestorianism (the belief that the person of Christ consists of two hypostases, a human and a divine, and that the Theotokos is therefore to be called Christotokos, as if Christ is not God). It also confirms the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed, and declares any additions or subtractions to it are henceforth forbidden. It is also declared that bishops are not to interfere in the vicinities and dioceses of other bishops.


Edited by Recluse (01/31/07 12:17 PM)

Top
#221948 - 01/31/07 01:30 PM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: Recluse]
lm Offline
Member

Registered: 08/29/05
Posts: 942
Loc: usa
Recluse,

Do you really think all that gibberish from a bunch of dead European males is relevant? wink?




Top
#221950 - 01/31/07 01:39 PM Re: Is"for us and our salvation" in the Ruthenian creed heretical? [Re: lm]
Recluse Offline
Member

Registered: 12/15/05
Posts: 733
Loc: Pennsylvania
Originally Posted By: lm
Recluse,

Do you really think all that gibberish from a bunch of dead European males is relevant? wink?


Forgive me. I forgot it was outdated material. grin


Edited by Recluse (01/31/07 01:40 PM)

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2



Moderator:  Father Anthony 

The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. Contents copyright - 1996-2012. All rights reserved.