The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Randy Danielson, TAFrazer, PNCC Random Guy, Coldstream, CA_Avgvstinus
5,768 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (Randy Danielson), 94 guests, and 41 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Church of the Holy Trinity (UGCC) - Brazil
Church of the Holy Trinity (UGCC) - Brazil
by Santiago Tarsicio, March 17
Papal Audience 10 November 2017
Papal Audience 10 November 2017
by JLF, November 10
Upgraded Russian icon corner
Upgraded Russian icon corner
by The young fogey, October 20
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,056
Posts414,078
Members5,768
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 473
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 473
How long will it take for this thread to get shut down ?

Putin's espionage church ^
The MP [Moscow Patriarchate] hierarchs not only informed against each other in the KGB, but they were also engaged in espionage. First of all, in Russian emigre communities. Even metropolitans had no aversion to espionage. For instance, Irinei, the metropolitan of Vienna and Austria, in 1969 recruited the American military intelligence officer, George Trofimoff, who is now serving a life sentence in the United States.
By Konstantin Preobrazhensky http://cicentre.com/Documents/
putin_espionage_church.html
Konstantin Preobrazhensky, a former Lt. Colonel in the KGB who defected to the United States in 1993, is an intelligence expert and specialist on Japan, about which he has written six books. This is a chapter of Konstantin Preobrazhensky’s forthcoming book, Russian Americans: A New KGB Asset.

1. Russian Victory Over America


On May 17, 2007, Russia has gained a historical victory over America. It has opened its province here, which is called the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Of Russia (ROCOR). On this day it has recognized Moscow’s superiority over itself by signing an Act of Canonical Community with the Moscow Patriarchate (MP). But in Russia the Church and state separated only on paper. In fact, the Moscow Patriarchate (MP) is controlled by the Russian neo-KGB state and has always been the pawn of the Russian intelligence.

Though a part of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Of Russia (ROCOR) has refused to come under Moscow’s rule and retained independence, many thousands of Russian Americans and their children are now nourished in the spirit of loyalty to authoritarian Russia, which is becoming hostile to America day-by-day. KGB-backed priests with Russian passports are replacing local clergy. Their churches have become insidious fronts for Russian state interests no matter how our relations evolve in the future.

Initially, ROCOR has been the Church of Imperial Russia, brought to the West by Russian ?migr?s after the Communist revolution of 1917. While the Moscow Patriarchate (MP) was founded by Stalin in 1943 for political purpose: enhancing patriotism in Russia and spying on the ill-hated West. In preparation of the seizure of ROCOR, the KGB has been infiltrated it for over 70 years! From 2000, President Putin has personally guided this mammoth KGB operation.

2. Confessions of Aleksey II

It is interesting, why do the Moscow Patriarchate (MP) hierarchs so persistently resist repenting their cooperation with the KGB? Metropolitan Chrysostom, after all, acknowledged his collaboration, and nothing happened to him. No one fired him. Why are others silent?

I used to think that they were silent because of their fear of new exposures. For instance, if you admit having collaborated with the KGB, that could lead to the exposure of also your membership in the CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union). How would ROCOR react to that?

Yes, the leadership of the MP all were members of the Communist Party, which has been skillfully concealed. They say that the first Communist within the church was Patriarch Pimen. He was a Senior officer of the Red Army, and joined the Communist Party at the front.

There could not have been any officers who believed in God, nor officers who were not Communist Party members. More than that, they were all forced to fight religion. That means that the future patriarch of the MP renounced his faith.

High-ranking workers of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, had let me in on this secret when I was an officer of Intelligence. They used to practice a sort of crude joke on the MP hierarchs. Seeing a person in episcopal clothing at a Kremlin party or at a conference for peace fighters, they would clap him on the shoulder and inquire loudly: “Tell us, Father, which pocket of your cassock holds your party membership ID card?” The bishop would smile a bit sheepishly, but he never objected, since everyone at that gathering was of the same background.

But they keep quiet for another reason. A well-known former general of the KGB, Oleg Kalugin, recently told me this. In 1990 he became the deputy of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR and he was the first person to begin exposing KGB agents in cassocks.

The MP became greatly disturbed. They were not afraid of individual exposes, but they were petrified that their main secret – that the MP had intentionally been created by Stalin to be a liaison with the KGB, just as other Soviet organizations of the State, would be revealed. No one would ever dream of bringing to light the fact that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has KGB agents working in it. That’s understood. But if you were to admit that the same thing is in the MP, then where is its sanctity?

Soon after my talk with him, General Kalugin was invited to a private luncheon with the Patriarch. Patriarch Alexey II told Kalugin the following: “Why are you exaggerating what happened? Yes, we collaborated with the KGB, even I did. But it was a struggle for peace, for disarmament! There’s nothing wrong with that!”

To say that a KGB informer is fighting for peace, now that is truly unbelievable. No one has ever portrayed it that way before. The KGB didn’t have any specialties in that vein – no struggle for peace departments. These words are propaganda nonsense! On the contrary, we fought for war! Results of our activity were military conflicts one after the other – in Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Mozambique, Angola. This led to a bloating of the military-industrial complex, of which Intelligence was a part. The country was unable to sustain the weight of it all, and the USSR collapsed.

Alexey II let me know in no uncertain terms that he does not consider his collaboration with the KGB something shameful, and has no intentions of repenting of it. On the contrary, he is proud of it, just as Putin is proud of his work in the KGB during the Soviet years. The complete absence of repentance lays down a bridge for future cooperation of the MP and the KGB of today. Why would a well-bred nobleman Ridiger (Alexey II family name is Ridiger) be so dedicated to the Soviet authorities? What has bound them so tightly?

In the distant 1996, my journalistic destiny brought me to a Communist meeting in Novocherkassk. Presidential elections were underway in Russia, and the head of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Zyuganov, appeared to be a serious contender to Boris Yeltsin. He came for support to this Cossack region, where his predecessors in the 1920s conducted mass executions. Now the area is known for its pro-Communist sentiment.

An elderly priest, Father Vladimir, from a local cathedral also spoke at this meeting. He, too, spoke out in favor of Zyuganov, which brought about immense surprise on the part of foreign journalists. But Father Vladimir firmly declared:

“In order for us to study in the Seminary, we were recalled from the Front! To this day we arerateful to the Communist Party for it. Therefore we accepted our studies in the Seminary as one would accept an assignment at the Front. That’s how we referred to ourselves our whole life – the non-party-ticketed Communists!”

Which department had the authority to recall people from the Front, especially during such critical years of the war, when even the sick and feeble were dragged into the army? It could only have been the NKVD (“People’s Commissariat of Internal Affairs”, the precursor to the KGB). On whom would she have bestowed this unheard of privilege, which could have saved the person’s life? Only on those who had already been proven reliable and trustworthy, the agents.

Stalin created the MP with the hands of the KGB. This department became her mother. The genetic ties with the KGB in the Moscow Patriarchate are just as strong as the ties between ROCOR and the White anti-Communist Movement.

For approximately thirty years, the KGB residence in Israel was located inside the Jerusalem Mission of the MP. There were no other Soviet offices in that country after the break of diplomatic relations in the mid -1960s. On the staff of the Mission, Intelligence officers worked as priests and laity ...
3. THE Lubyanka Consecration
Informing to the KGB within the Moscow Patriarchate has been a serious obstacle against the unification with the MP of the Church Abroad (ROCOR). What if it continues to this day, the informing? Who can say that it no longer takes place?

Those who side with unification try to minimize the collaboration and to make it look like just individual cases, not a global phenomenon within the Church, that it truly was. They say, for instance, that only some priests became KGB agents within the overall independent life of the Church. Here in the West this bait is swallowed easily.

The rector of the Saint John the Baptist Cathedral in Washington, D.C., Archpriest Victor Potapov, states the following in the August, 2004 issue of the magazine, “Prihodskaya Zhizn” (“Parish Life”): “ Within the confines of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia hot disputes are occurring regarding the future path of the Church and regarding the reunion with the Moscow Patriarchate. In reference with this, I find myself hearing sharp attacks against individual bishops and certain church activists. Objections sometimes are simplified to this – it is impossible to unite with the church in Russia because some of the priests have been corrupted and collaborated with the KGB and haven’t repented of their collaboration. It cannot be possible that the sins of individual people would throw a shadow on the sanctity of the Church.”

Dear Father Victor! It is not so at all. It is not individuals. It is, in fact, some individuals who escaped recruitment by the KGB! Absolutely all bishops and the overwhelming majority of priests collaborated with the KGB. You have to understand that the Church was considered a hostile environment, and it needed, therefore, to be controlled via agents. Even the mechanism of choosing a bishop, only pushed through its agents.

Bishops were part of the nomenclature of the CK KPSS (Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union), and therefore each individual had to be approved by the Ideological Department. And which organization, do you think, would send documentation to the Central Committee for important staff appointments? That’s right, it was the KGB. The recommendation for the future bishop would have been prepared by the Fifth Department, which had general responsibility over the Church, and Intelligence, if he had ever been overseas. Each of the recommendations ended with the phrase: “Collaborates since such a year.”

It was this phrase that was most important for the Central Committee. This phrase testified to the fact that the future bishop was not only loyal to the Soviet authorities, but that he also hangs on a hook: since each agent invariably has compromising materials in his file! This means that this bishop can be trusted not to play any dissident tricks. The astuteness of this observation is evident even today – all the bishops sacredly keep their vow of silence.

Ecclesiastical merits of a candidate for bishop did not interest the Ideological Department. To the contrary, they were hostile to them. The less merits, the better. After this, the Central Committee sanctioned the consecration. Just one thing, is it possible to consider it as such?

However, the consecration was only the beginning. Afterward, it was necessary to be registered as a Bishop in the Council on Religious Affairs. This was granted after a confidential interview with its chairman, Vladimir Kuroyedov, a KGB Lieutenant General.

He used to like to come dine in the General’s dining hall at Lubyanka. Entering, he would show everyone his pass into the Kremlin dining hall and would say: “See, I could have been dining with Brezhnev himself! But I prefer to eat with my guys!”

The Generals replied with a responsive roar and each would move his chair back, inviting Kuroyedov to his table. Not infrequently his table partner would wind up being my father, the Deputy Chief of the KGB’s Border Troops. In the evenings he would retell some amazing stories from church life, which at that time was completely confidential. And all the bishops, blessed by Kuroyedov, still hold their posts and are even attempting to attach the Church Abroad to the MP.

To this day, they all remain, as before, a part of the agency network. They would have been excluded from the network for decoding, had they brought a public repentance. But there was no such repentance. That means that their files still remain active in the safes of Lubyanka. Not in its archives, but in its working files.

The MP hierarchs not only informed against each other in the KGB, but they were also engaged in espionage. First of all, in Russian ?migr? communities. Even metropolitans had no aversion to espionage. For instance, Irinei, the metropolitan of Vienna and Austria, in 1969 recruited the American military intelligence officer, George Trofimoff, who is now serving a life sentence in the United States.

For approximately thirty years, the KGB residence in Israel was located inside the Jerusalem Mission of the MP. There were no other Soviet offices in that country after the break of diplomatic relations in the mid -1960s. On the staff of the Mission, Intelligence officers worked as priests and laity, whereas “real” clergy were relegated to ... The Secretary of the Mission and KGB Major Dubov fled to the West in the late 1980s, and the MP did everything it could to avoid publicity.

4. The Church of Special Purpose

A priest in epaulets – isn’t such a strange sight in the Moscow Patriarchate. I don’t mean that literally, of course. I met one of them on my first day on the job in the KGB’s Intelligence Headquarters in Yasenevo in 1977.

I remember how amazed I was by the long corridors, seemingly kilometers-long, along which scurried hundreds of men in business suits and ties. Their coat jackets were perfectly buttoned-shut, their hair was parted neatly in the middle. Their overall slicked-back appearance was supposed to attest to their highest level of loyalty. And suddenly an officer with a bushy red beard passed me in the corridor. What a remarkable appearance, so totally out-of-place for a Communist-chekist?!

“Don’t be alarmed, he has grown a beard at the instruction of his Intelligence supervisor!” a friend of mine explained laughing. He worked in the personnel department. “Right now this high-level employee is gaining experience in the foreign section of the Patriarchate, and soon he’ll be leaving for an overseas assignment. . .”

My friend didn’t disclose exactly where the bearded KGB officer was being sent, in keeping with the KGB’s conspiratorial protocol, however, he did tell me a story about a professor he knew in the Red-Bannered Institute of the KGB, (Today it is the Academy of Foreign Intelligence) who kept a cassock next to his KGB Colonel’s dress-jacket hanging in his closet. When Patriarch Pimen would travel overseas, the professor/colonel would don the cassock and join his entourage.

In those years a young supervisor of external Counter-Intelligence, General Oleg Kalugin, arrived in East Berlin to inspect the KGB residence. On one of those days, Colonel Ivan Nazarovich Gumeniuk, came up to him and invited him to stop by at the Russian Cathedral that evening.

“I will be serving there,” explained Gumeniuk.

He served in church so professionally, that the parishioners who came up to get his blessing, were convinced that they were kissing the hand of Father John, and not the hand of Colonel Gumeniuk.

“Wow, you really came across great! Just like a real priest.” General Kalugin told him enthusiastically the next morning when they met at the residence.

Such “just like the real thing” priests formed the staff of MP churches all over the world, although in the friendly Arab countries, they practically made up the entire clergy there. The local Muslim counter-intelligence closed their eyes to it, since the priests-chekists worked against the West.

These people didn’t always have a happy life. The Lord sent them many trials and tribulations. The children of some began to have faith in God, which was considered unacceptable in the family of a chekist. Others themselves began to believe. Their chekist-colleagues would sniff it out immediately, and that would be the end of their careers. In my book, “KGB in Japan” (Moscow, “Tsentrpoligraph”, 2000), I wrote in detail about the KGB’s pseudo-priests.

Where are these pseudo-priests now? Have they remained among the clergy of the Moscow Patriarchate?

In the West it is customary to assume that these clerics have evaporated into thin air. But why? Is there even one Russian State enterprise which has purged itself of its KGB agents, as had taken place in some other former socialist countries after the fall of Communism? Unfortunately in Russia this was squashed by the powerful Communist lobby. There definitely were no purges of the KGB within the MP, today’s greatest fan of the Soviet past.

I am aware of only one attempt. It took place in the newspaper “Izvestia” (“News”) right after the fall of the August putsch in 1991. The then editor-in-chief, Igor Golembiovsky, called all the chekists into his office, all those who were working in his newspaper as journalists, and suggested that they either resign from the newspaper or from the KGB. He told them that he was no longer willing to put up with them working in both capacities.

Golembiovsky was never forgiven for his independent thinking, and in Putin’s Russia he is persecuted. Aleksey II, on the other hand, remains at the peak of his glory. The conclusion one can make, of course, is that no chekists were ever expelled from his ranks.

The collaboration of the MP with the KGB, unfortunately, is not a thing of the past, as many prefer to believe in the West. With Putin in power, it has even increased. The reason for this is the new social structure, which Plutin has managed to create in Russia: the State of Special Services. Internal policies and propaganda is under the FSB, whereas the external is under the SVR. All other departments report to them. Participating in today’s Russian political life, it is impossible to avoid contact with Intelligence and Counter-Intelligence. The MP gladly utilizes its Soviet experience within them.

For instance, Putin’s flirtation with the North Korean dictator, Kim Jong Il, is held in strictest confidence, in order to keep Americans in the dark. The MP, however, is involved, and takes a most active role in it.

In August, 2006 an MP church, dedicated to the Holy Trinity, was opened in Pyongyang, although religion is forbidden in North Korea, and belief in God is considered a political crime. But Kim Jong Il made an exception for his Russian friend. The construction was financed mostly by Russian money, but Kim Jong Il also kindly carved out about a million dollars from the budget of his poverty-stricken country for the construction of the church. This gave him the privilege of being considered a “founder of this temple”.

“For the founder of this temple, let us pray to the Lord!” the Russian deacon will proclaim at each service daily. To make the North Korean dictator an object of religious worship – this is something previously unattainable by any Western president! The appearance on a Russian church in the capital of North Korea, the first stone of which had been laid in June of 2003, is a sign of a great personal friendship between Kim Jong Il and Putin, to spite the Americans.

On this occasion, Kim was so kind as to establish a new government office, “The Orthodox Committee of the DPRK” although there have not been any Orthodox believers in this country for more than fifty years.

A delegation of this bogus Committee recently went to Moscow. Within the MP, the delegation only visited one office, besides the Department of External Church Relations. And what might that be? The Department on Collaboration with the Armed Forces and Law Enforcement Agencies. It’s interesting, what did this delegation need there? It looks like Kim Jong Il considers the MP a militarized organization, meant for resolving special tasks.

The appearance of the Russian church in Pyongyang creates a channel for secret contacts for both leaders, a channel inaccessible to international control. No one could possibly know what type of epistles the silent priests in black robes will begin to bring into Pyongyang.

This channel is especially valuable because all other channels are open to scrutiny by the Americans. For instance, Bush could ask Putin at one of their meetings:

“Tell me, my friend Vladimir, are you engaged in some kind of clandestine hanky-panky with Kim Jong Il?”

And Putin would be forced to explain himself, because Intelligence checks everything. But in questions regarding religious contacts, Putin will have the right to reply:

“Well that, my dear friend, is non of your business. Faith – is sacrosanct!”

And Bush will have no come-back because his government truly does not get involved in matters of the Church.

In the Moscow Theological Academy, presently there are students from North Korea. Where did they come from? If they were truly believers, they would have been imprisoned. The answer is obvious – they are from the Ministry of State Security. Kim Jong Il is creating an Orthodox Church patterned after Stalin’s church, with the hands of the chekists, the security forces.

But all of the officers of friendly Special Services accredited in Russia, are under the inconspicuous patronage of the Service of Foreign Intelligence. They are invited to resorts, to closed meetings, to banquets. It is interesting whether the North Korean seminarians, leaving the Lavra (monastery) for Moscow, tell their spiritual advisor something like the following: “Bless us, Father, to go to the Reception House of the Service of Foreign Intelligence, which is located in Kolpachniy Lane”?

The MP also “lit up” in the spy scandal which erupted after the murder of the former Chechen leader, Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev in Qatar by Russian agents. In February, 2004 they blew up the car Yandarbiyev was entering after he left a mosque, and were subsequently arrested.



There definitely were no purges of the KGB within the MP, today's greatest fan of the Soviet past.

I am aware of only one attempt. It took place in the newspaper “Izvestia” (“News”) right after the fall of the August putsch in 1991. The then editor-in-chief, Igor Golembiovsky, called all the chekists into his office, all those who were working in his newspaper as journalists, and suggested that they either resign from the newspaper or from the KGB. He told them that he was no longer willing to put up with them working in both capacities.


Golembiovsky was never forgiven for his independent thinking, and in Putin’s Russia he is persecuted. Aleksey II, on the other hand, remains at the peak of his glory. The conclusion one can make, of course, is that no chekists were ever expelled from his ranks.

The collaboration of the MP with the KGB, unfortunately, is not a thing of the past, as many prefer to believe in the West. With Putin in power, it has even increased. The reason for this is the new social structure, which Plutin has managed to create in Russia: the State of Special Services. Internal policies and propaganda is under the FSB, whereas the external is under the SVR. All other departments report to them. Participating in today’s Russian political life, it is impossible to avoid contact with Intelligence and Counter-Intelligence. The MP gladly utilizes its Soviet experience within them.

One of the arrested Russian agents happened to be the local resident of the GRU (Military Intelligence). Since his diplomatic immunity did not allow for him to be imprisoned, he was released. But two others didn’t have diplomat immunity, and were retained for a long time. They immediately admitted to their membership in the GRU, attesting to the fact that Russia is involved in international terrorism. The same terrorism, with which it so passionately appeals for the world to fight. Putin was furious. He applied tremendous efforts to get the unfortunate terrorists released, but his efforts were futile.
Then a stream of Russian representatives began to flow into Qatar. Many officials under various pretexts all tried to break into the jail cell, but the Qatar authorities would allow no on to see them due to security precautions. They were so right in doing so since the killers needed to be liquidated. All that was needed was to smuggle a tiny ampoule under one’s finger nail into the prison cell. Then you would break it open, emitting a colorless substance inside the cell. Within minutes, the person is gone, and as Comrade Stalin used to say: “No person, no problem”.

In despair, Moscow decided to utilize its most unfailing helper for tricky assignments – the Moscow Patriarchate. Bishop Theofan, of Stavropol and Vladikavkaz, flew to Qatar, making it look as though the poor suffering officers imprisoned there, were so deeply religious, that they would rather listen to sermons of a bishop than to break bread. And not just any bishop, but specifically Theofan, known for his contact with Intelligence. Prior to this, he served for many years in the Department of External Church Relations, where he was an intimate of Metropolitan Cyril, whose code name in KGB files says: “Mikhailov”.

Qatar did not let him in either. It is possible that they knew that the MP is a cover for espionage. Besides, the faith of the agents had left great doubts, since inside the exploded car, Yandabiyev’s young son had also been injured. It is unlikely that a believing Christian would decide to kill an innocent child. Even the socialist-revolutionary terrorists who, in 1905, blew up the car with Grand Duke Sergey Alexandrovich, who was the Governor-General of Moscow, at first refused to make the attempt on his life, seeing that he was in the car with his children. Yet these loser-terrorists had been to Chechnya, where the GRU tortures and kills people. Since they were sent to Qatar to do the assignment, it is reasonable to assume that they did everything themselves. The resulting problems, one can attribute to the punishing hand of God. It would have been better for Bishop Theofan to visit the thousands of innocent people, rotting in Russia’s prisons.



The Moscow Patriarchate is amazingly merciful toward murderers fulfilling presidential orders. In 2004, Aleksey II awarded Dmitry Pavlichenko, a Colonel of the Belorussian Special Services, with the Medal of the Equal-to-the-Apostles Prince Vladimir. He was the infamous organizer of the “squadrons of death”, which liquidated political enemies of President Lukashenko. The MP Exarch (Representative) in Byelorussia, Metropolitan Philaret, personally petitioned for this award. His stated reasoning was that in a garrison under Pavlichenko’s control, a church had been built. The occasion was clearly not synchronized with the high status of the Medal he received.

“Novaya Gazeta” (“New Newspaper”) published an article about this under the heading “Church of Special Purpose” in August, 2004. “The awarding of Dmitry Pavlichenko with the Holy Equal-to-the-Apostles Prince Vladimir Medal is beyond any logical explanation. Because you don’t need to travel to Belarus to see newly- constructed churches scattered on garrison and prison territories. There are more than enough of those in Russia, as well. But for some reason those, who construct churches in Russia do not receive medals for it. Could it be that the Patriarch and his Metropolitan have decided that he, who, with his own hand sends people to God, is worthy of this high church award?” wrote the newspaper.

“No one in Europe doubts that Pavlichenko, as well as Sheiman and Sivakov, the former Secretary of the Security Council and the Minister of Internal Affairs respectively, were participants in the organization and execution of the murders.” continues the newspaper. “That’s why the Greek authorities refused to allow Sivakov, who now holds the position of Minister of Sport and was supposed to head the Olympic delegation, entry into Athens. The European Community made a special declaration on this point. And exactly in three days, the Russian Orthodox Church awards Pavlichenko this medal. A coincidence, one could say. Or is it the Russians’ “reply to Chamberlain”?


Svetlana Zavadskaya, the wife of Dmitry Zavadskiy, the ORT (Russian Television) camera man who was kidnapped on July 7, 2000, said: “It is very sad that the Russian Orthodox Church awards its second highest Medal in Russia to Dmitry Pavlichenko, who is known in the civilized world as a person suspected of being an accomplice in kidnappings and murders of people. As a believer, I am deeply offended by this. The Orthodox Church in Russia and Belarus is so highly politicized, that for me, clearly, it would be better to commune with God directly, without intermediaries.”


Yet here, among Russian immigrants, the sentiments are diametrically opposite those just expressed -- many have dreamed of unifying with the Moscow Patriarchate. Why?



Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217

On the subject of Vladimir Putin, here's a good reply from traditional Roman Catholic Patrick Buchanan.

Who Restarted the Cold War?

by Patrick J. Buchanan
"Putin's Hostile Course," the lead editorial in the Washington Times of Oct. 18, began thus:

"Russian President Vladimir Putin's invitation to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to visit Moscow is just the latest sign that, more than 16 years after the collapse of Soviet communism, Moscow is gravitating toward Cold War behavior. The old Soviet obsession – fighting American imperialism – remains undiluted. ...

"(A)t virtually every turn, Mr. Putin and the Russian leadership appear to be doing their best in ways large and small to marginalize and embarrass the United States and undercut U.S. foreign policy interests."

The Times pointed to Putin's snub of Robert Gates and Condi Rice by having them cool their heels for 40 minutes before a meeting. Then came a press briefing where Putin implied Russia may renounce the Reagan-Gorbachev INF treaty, which removed all U.S. and Soviet medium-range missiles from Europe, and threatened to pull out of the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty, whereby Russia moved its tanks and troops far from the borders of Eastern Europe.

On and on the Times indictment went. Russia was blocking new sanctions on Iran. Russia was selling anti-aircraft missiles to Iran. Russia was selling weapons to Syria that found their way to Hezbollah and Hamas. Russia and Iran were talking up an OPEC-style natural gas cartel. All this, said the Times, calls to mind "Soviet-era behavior."

Missing from the prosecution's case, however, was the motive. Why has Putin's Russia turned hostile? Why is Putin mending fences with China, Iran and Syria? Why is Putin sending Bear bombers to the edge of American airspace? Why has Russia turned against America? For Putin's approval rating is three times that of George Bush. Who restarted the Cold War?

To answer that question, let us go back those 16 years.

What happened in 1991 and 1992?

Well, Russia let the Berlin Wall be torn down and its satellite states be voted or thrown out of power across Eastern Europe. Russia agreed to pull the Red Army all the way back inside its border. Russia agreed to let the Soviet Union dissolve into 15 nations. The Communist Party agreed to share power and let itself be voted out. Russia embraced freedom and American-style capitalism, and invited Americans in to show them how it was done.

Russia did not use its veto in the Security Council to block the U.S. war to drive Saddam Hussein, an ally, out of Kuwait. When 9-11 struck, Putin gave his blessing to U.S. troops using former republics as bases for the U.S. invasion.

What was Moscow's reward for its pro-America policy?

The United States began moving NATO into Eastern Europe and then into former Soviet republics. Six ex-Warsaw Pact nations are now NATO allies, as are three ex-republics of the Soviet Union. NATO expansionists have not given up on bringing Ukraine, united to Russia for centuries, or Georgia, Stalin's birthplace, into NATO.

In 1999, the United States bombed Serbia, which has long looked to Mother Russia for protection, for 78 days, though the Serbs' sole crime was to fight to hold their cradle province of Kosovo, as President Lincoln fought to hold onto the American South. Now America is supporting the severing of Kosovo from Serbia and creation of a new Islamic state in the Balkans, over Moscow's protest.

While Moscow removed its military bases from Cuba and all over the Third World, we have sought permanent military bases in Russia's backyard of Central Asia.

We dissolved the Nixon-Brezhnev ABM treaty and announced we would put a missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Under presidents Clinton and Bush, the United States financed a pipeline for Caspian Sea oil to transit Azerbaijan and Georgia to the Black Sea and Turkey, cutting Russia out of the action.

With the end of the Cold War, the KGB was abolished and the Comintern disappeared. But the National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House and other Cold War agencies, funded with tens of millions in tax-exempt and tax dollars, engineered the ouster of pro-Russian regimes in Serbia, Ukraine and Georgia, and sought the ouster of the regime in Minsk.

At the Cold War's end, the United States was given one of the great opportunities of history: to embrace Russia, largest nation on earth, as partner, friend, ally. Our mutual interests meshed almost perfectly. There was no ideological, territorial, historic or economic quarrel between us, once communist ideology was interred.

We blew it.

We moved NATO onto Russia's front porch, ignored her valid interests and concerns, and, with our "indispensable-nation" arrogance, treated her as a defeated power, as France treated Weimar Germany after Versailles.

Who restarted the Cold War? Bush and the braying hegemonists he brought with him to power. Great empires and tiny minds go ill together.





Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 87
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 87
Quote
In 1999, the United States bombed Serbia, which has long looked to Mother Russia for protection, for 78 days, though the Serbs' sole crime was to fight to hold their cradle province of Kosovo, as President Lincoln fought to hold onto the American South. Now America is supporting the severing of Kosovo from Serbia and creation of a new Islamic state in the Balkans, over Moscow's protest.


This is way to one sided. Do not forget about genocide or the extermination of the people of Kosovo at the hands of the Serbs. That fact is "kindly" left out.

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 194
BANNED
Member
Offline
BANNED
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 194
I'm not alway cazy about Pat Buchanan's POV, but he makes a really good point. I have to admit that in my mind Russia has become a non entity. No wonder they are saber rattling. It might not do much good as their sabers are made of brittle plastic, but rattle they ought.

As for the ROC being the pawn of Putin, no surprises their. The ROC and Putin are classically xenophobic. They share plenty of common interests. As for the ROC in America being an extension of the KGB, sounds far fetched to me. It all comes back to Russian messianism again, doesn't it?


Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
"We moved NATO onto Russia's front porch, ignored her valid interests and concerns, and, with our 'indispensable-nation' arrogance, treated her as a defeated power, as France treated Weimar Germany after Versailles. "

I have no intention of justifying it, but our diplomatic skepticism wasn't unwarranted. The relations between Russia and the United States was complicated by the decades of the Cold War. Even though the old guard was toppled, the internal economic network was at a collapsed state. There were still plenty of old hands working in the system. The transition to a Western democracy was also complicated by self-serving middle men who demanded their share. Buchanan's narrative is a little quick for my tastes; I don't know enough to counter it, but what I have read leads me to believe that US-Russian relations is a rather difficult situation to describe.

He takes it a little far when he suggests we may be entering into a second Cold War. Putin's rhetoric, vocal or not, has yet to be backed up by action. At the moment it is obvious that Putin is making a show, their war games, their claims that our missile defense system would not be able to counter their technology, the restructuring of the military. But is he doing this for international credibility, to be as influential as when the USSR was? So then his aim would to be a superpower and the diplomatic maneuverings would be strategically placed to move Russia to superpower status.

To take it one step further, to suggest that in addition to the international credibility, he seeks to resume the Cold War, then other nations would have to step in and ally themselves with one or the other country, such as what happened with NATO and Warsaw. I would believe that the "Cold War" speaks more of the world's political climate than it does a particular nation's ambitions for greatness. (Which, I take it to be Russia's aim at the moment.)

Terry

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
D
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
Offline
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
D
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Personally, I've always liked Pat Buchanan, and I think he is right about the woeful influence of the "neocons". I wish he were right about Putin et al. However, I remember that, around 1984, a book was released, entitled New Lies For Old by Anatoliy Golitsyn, another former KGB officer. Golitsyn, from what I remember, had a policy-related position in KGB. He indicated that KGB's strategy for the then future involved the USSR "cutting loose" the satellite countries because they were an economic drag, and putting on a pretense of shedding the Marxist-Leninist past & adopting western liberalism, thus softening up the U.S. and its allies, opening up the door for western credit and investment. The bottom line is that the former USSR would then strike at the west when the time was right. So far, I have seen very little to discredit the writings of Golitsyn. I also can see the possibility that ROCOR was "set up" in this reunion with the MP which was carried out, after all, at the instigation of Vladimir Putin.

Dn. Robert

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 384
E
Member
Offline
Member
E
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 384
1)What has "who restarted the Cold War?" got to do with
Eastern Christianity? I don't see that Pat Buchanan's opinions on
the subject, whatever you may think of them, belong here.

2)Much of what Jean Francois presents may well be perfectly true
but I cannot imagine ROCOR being much of a threat to national
security.It is not exactly a large body and there is no reason
to believe that its members in this country are anything but
true Christians and loyal Americans.

3)I do not in the least trust Putin. His words and behavior seem to becoming ever more Soviet. Russia has never known anything
but autocratic government, and in the last century one of the
most obscene tyannies known in the history of the planet.
The fall of the Soviet Empire at least has opened up the possibility of change for the better, but we can't expect it
to happen quickly, if it is to happen at all.

4)The Russian-Orthodox Church is more than its hierarchs.The
issue of who and how many of the bishops were and are KGB
is very real but is an issue that must be worked out by
the Russian Church itself under the guidance of the Holy
Spirit. The control of a Church by the state, officially,
as in some Protestant countries, or de facto, as in some
Catholic states, is not unknown in the West either, and the
purposes and actions of those states often very much in
contradiction to the will of God. Consider Louis XIV who
shed much innocent blood in his pursuit of power and "gloire".

5) Let us seek after moderation, restraint, and mutual charity
while attempting to speak the truth in love.

Edmac


Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,285
AthanasiusTheLesser
Member
Offline
AthanasiusTheLesser
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,285
Originally Posted by Edmac
2)Much of what Jean Francois presents may well be perfectly true
but I cannot imagine ROCOR being much of a threat to national
security.It is not exactly a large body and there is no reason
to believe that its members in this country are anything but
true Christians and loyal Americans.
Edmac



While I have almost no experience with members of ROCOR, it has been my personal experience those who have immigrated recently, naturalized citizens, and those whose families immigrated within the last 2-3 generations are often among the most loyal Americans of all. I say this not as someone who falls into any of these three groups, but as someone whose ancestors came to America so long ago that I have no sense whatsoever of being tied with any European country. Those whose families have come more recently tend to bring a different perspective and are often more appreciative of both the prosperity and personal liberties that exist here. Perhaps this is why many of them are so loyal?

Ryan

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 199
W
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 199
Ryan, I'd second your comments. ROCOR members tend to be extremely patriotic, and they often express their thanks for the role the West played in the Cold War.

----------
Western Orthodoxy Blog

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 521
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 521
I,for one,don't think that this thread should be shut down.

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 384
E
Member
Offline
Member
E
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 384
I agree with Fr. Al if for no other reason than that the
matters raised by Jean Francois are very grave and cannot
and should not be treated as if they did not exist.If anyone
has any doubts about this view,consider the murder of Fr.
Alexandr Men which remains unsolved and, as far as one can
tell, with no effort ever being made to solve it. I like neither
Jean Francois' hysterical tone nor his resemblance to conspiracy
theorists nor his unsupportable claims of being confided in by
KGB agents(by all of which he does himself a disservice if he
want to be taken seriously) but this does not mean that his
allegations should be dismissed out of hand.

Edmac

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
I am skeptical of the narrative too. When someone is "asked" to corporate with the KGB, as their rise in position is dependent on their good standing with the Party and its apparatus, it's understandable that they would find it easier to corporate than to worm around the pressure. A person's character can be corrupted by inches here and there and they can turn out to be a very different person than they once dreamed. Preobrazhensky's tone dissuades me from trusting him.

Terry


Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,788
Likes: 13
Moderator
Member
Offline
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,788
Likes: 13
I have to look at this piece as being "on the surface" when it describes the MP and ROCOR.

First of all--any maybe this is my Latin background coming out--I've always been taught that it is not the personal holiness of the priest or bishop that makes the Church or that makes the Holy Mysteries a channel of grace. Somehow if the most violent, the most disreputable, the most unworthy man were somehow to hide behind a mask and become ordained, his own sinfulness would not affect the ability of Christ to sanctify me and my brethren through him. If I am not mistaken, the East calls this "economia." So I'm not disturbed if a KGB agent serves Vespers or the Divine Liturgy for that matter, as long as he has been canonically ordained and is currently given permission to function.

Remember history. At one time, if I'm not mistaken, all the bishops in the East except St. Athanasius of Alexandria were supposed to be Arian. Did that affect the ability of Christ to sanctify the lives of the average believer through their serving of the Mysteries? Someone who may not even have realized that his bishop was not orthodox? I think not.

As far as ROCOR is concerned, I understand that this has caused a lot of anguish among her members and a lot of honest soul searching among some of her clergy who just cannot accept this move. And I sympathize with them. This is the stuff that real believers wrestle with. It's easy to "go along to get along." It's the stuff of real believers to wrestle with an issue and in conscience stand against the flow of the rest of the Church.

So let's be a little more sensitive to this situation. The gentleman who wrote the piece is seeing the surface which most of us can see. But it is the Lord Who can see into the heart and makes the judgments about what is going on there. And He can use even outright evil, drawing the good out of it, for the benefit of someone served by one of these priests or bishops that are so maligned. Remember the answer that Lot received--if even one righteous man could be found in Sodom, the Lord would withhold His Righteous Anger. That He found none was the reason the fire came on them all. There are apparently good people both in the MP and in ROCOR who honestly believe that they are doing His Holy Will.

So let's be charitable in regard to motives and consciences.

In Christ,

BOB

PS: I just talked to a family who opposed the merger of their Protestant Church into another way back in 1968. They were so miffed that they have refused to join that merger and refused to go to any other Church of any stripe because they don't believe they can be anything else. No one wins here. They still profess to believe in Christ but have had no church fellowship in almost 40 years. Where does that leave them? I don't know the answer to that.

Last edited by theophan; 10/26/07 03:38 PM.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 473
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 473
The source of my post is a government sponsored organzation dedicated to the security and counterintelligence of the United States. To the 'nay sayers' - the ROC is an arm of the Soviet turned Russian Federation state apparatus. Remember, the Moscow Patriarch thanked President Putin for the unification of the churches - not God. The USA State Department is concerned and so should you be.

Here is more info on the organization and the link to the original story:

The Centre for Counterintelligence and Security Studies (CI Centre)® provides advanced and innovative counterintelligence, counterterrorism and security training, analysis and consulting for people in the intelligence, national security and defense communities in the US Government as well as for the corporate sector. Espionage, spies and spying activities are in the news everyday. Get a professional, in-depth understanding of the issues and enhance your CI, CT and security awareness by attending our advanced courses taught by intelligence experts retired from the FBI, CIA, DOD, DOS, DOJ, Military Intelligence, RCMP and KGB as well as intelligence historians and authors. Schedule a dynamic, powerful D*I*C*E™ (Defensive Information to Counter Espionage) security awareness briefing given by Ray Semko, aka the "D*I*C*E Man". Learn more about us and our staff. We offer the best training you will ever take (feedback from course attendees). CI Centre courses are conveniently on the GSA Schedule.

http://cicentre.com/Documents/putin_espionage_church.html

I.F.


Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
I've read several histories of the KGB, which is part of the reason I don't embrace the conclusions this author makes. He has more of a sensational voice than a moderate and tempered tone which would have been steeped in research. He has the tone of a gossip. He may be looking at facts, but how he extrapolates them to explain world politics (or personal character) could be debated.

Why does he continue to use the term "KGB"? The Russian intelligence agency has had a name change since the fall. He does mention the GRU, but his use of the term "KGB" is dated and leads me to suspsct that he is rather tuned to a broad audience. The SRV is the agency which has the duties of gathering foreign intelligence.

Terry

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2020 (Forum 1998-2020). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5