Vinolentus, RusOrthCath, Cavaradossi, Roman Interloper, ftbond, NitaMacdonald1930, SOL, etomaria, Kostyantyn, Benny, Ivanov325, DocH, andria, Joe Smith, CanuckK8
4466 Registered Users |
|
|
18 registered (Job, babochka, DMD, sielos ilgesys, ByzBob, Peter J, Sepp, smarkatch, JLF, StuartK, larionov, Fr. Deacon Lance, Paul B, JDC, Carson Daniel, Collin Nunis, 2 invisible),
187
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
4464 Members
26 Forums
30152 Topics
373692 Posts
Max Online: 1087 @ 07/16/07 01:09 PM
|
|
|
#270585 - 12/29/07 01:50 PM
Re: Why wasn't The Our Father changed
[Re: Rusyn31]
|
Member
Registered: 04/30/06
Posts: 111
Loc: Illinois
|
When I am at Liturgy, I do not use the new versions of the Creed and the Communion Prayer. I recite them the way I was taught 30+ years ago.
As stated before, change is good, if it is done correctly and for the right reasons. Changing for the sake of change with no real reason is not... I was taught the Creed with the Filioque, I received First Holy Communion in 2nd grade (I think?). We've made changes to restore traditional practices; so dropping the Filioque from the Creed isn't just "for the sake of change."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#270599 - 12/29/07 03:12 PM
Re: Why wasn't The Our Father changed
[Re: Priest's Grandson]
|
Member
Registered: 02/13/04
Posts: 146
Loc: Ruthenia
|
When I am at Liturgy, I do not use the new versions of the Creed and the Communion Prayer. I recite them the way I was taught 30+ years ago.
As stated before, change is good, if it is done correctly and for the right reasons. Changing for the sake of change with no real reason is not... I was taught the Creed with the Filioque, I received First Holy Communion in 2nd grade (I think?). We've made changes to restore traditional practices; so dropping the Filioque from the Creed isn't just "for the sake of change." The removal of the Filioque is almost the only necessary change in the texts of the Divine Liturgy. And it was already gone in most places. There was nothing wrong with the rest of the Creed. Nor was there anything wrong with the other texts from 1965. The errors could have been corrected with a pencil. A bulldozer was not needed. The changes are all to serve personal agendas. If I hear "we must make progress with the Liturgy" one more time I'm gonna puke.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index