Vinolentus, RusOrthCath, Cavaradossi, Roman Interloper, ftbond, NitaMacdonald1930, SOL, etomaria, Kostyantyn, Benny, Ivanov325, DocH, andria, Joe Smith, CanuckK8
4466 Registered Users |
|
|
14 registered (Thomas the Seeker, Jakub., Padraig, Irish Melkite, Peter J, Apotheoun, Reader Joseph, Paul B, DTBrown, GMmcnabb, Carson Daniel, seraphion, babochka, 1 invisible),
187
Guests and
9
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
4466 Members
26 Forums
30152 Topics
373694 Posts
Max Online: 1087 @ 07/16/07 01:09 PM
|
|
|
#273941 - 01/18/08 05:54 PM
Re: Some Thoughts on the Revised Divine Liturgy
[Re: Steve Petach]
|
Member
Registered: 11/22/07
Posts: 886
Loc: Las Vegas
|
Many schools will not allow material quoted from Wikipedia to be used as reference material because there is no chain of reference as to who wrote or edited the entry.
"Many" ??? *shudder*  {There needs to be an icon pulling it's hair out!} [I did see one of a smiley prostrating somewhere a few days ago!] It should be *all*. And then there were the citations I used to receive of "www.google.com".  hawkk
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#274004 - 01/18/08 11:46 PM
Re: Some Thoughts on the Revised Divine Liturgy
[Re: Recluse]
|
BANNED
Member
Registered: 11/20/07
Posts: 113
Loc: Henderson, NV, U.S.A.
|
ok then & Thank You
God Bless your prayers!
Dandelion
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#274148 - 01/20/08 02:03 PM
Re: Some Thoughts on the Revised Divine Liturgy
[Re: John Damascene]
|
Member
Registered: 04/25/03
Posts: 49
Loc: Frankfort, IL
|
[quote=John Damascene] We have mandated music that is so bad you have to laugh at so you don't begin to cry at what was lost.
As a musician who has compared the new settings with those found in the 1906 Prostopinije and the 1933 Irmologion, I find the new settings very good and very singable. I have also found that the only people who disagree with me are those who don't read music and have trouble singing musically. Translations aside, I think the new book is good. Tim Woods
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#274156 - 01/20/08 02:49 PM
Re: Some Thoughts on the Revised Divine Liturgy
[Re: TimWoods]
|
Member
Registered: 05/22/07
Posts: 1515
Loc: MD
|
... the 1933 Irmologion ... Can you please provide some more information on this source; thanks.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#274526 - 01/22/08 09:19 AM
Re: Some Thoughts on the Revised Divine Liturgy
[Re: TimWoods]
|
Member
Registered: 12/15/05
Posts: 733
Loc: Pennsylvania
|
I have also found that the only people who disagree with me are those who don't read music and have trouble singing musically. I disagree with you. I read, play, and sing--for about 38 years. But then I can only speak for myself.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#274952 - 01/23/08 10:41 PM
Re: Some Thoughts on the Revised Divine Liturgy
[Re: Recluse]
|
Member
Registered: 04/25/03
Posts: 49
Loc: Frankfort, IL
|
That's fine. I welcome your disagreement. But what are you basing your disagreement on? If you compare the new settings and the 1970 Levkulic Chant book with the 1906 Prostopinije, what we sang from 1970 until last year wasn't even close to the "tradition".
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index