UnityNow, ALLEN, Dionysius25, Douglas W, 2105, Subdeacon Ben, Juvenaly, WAbersdorf, Pulane, Monk Michael, Chris Johnson, MikeP, Francois, dkullman, Tarasbulba, Takumaku, joedavis30, DavidYuhanna, Thunder33, Michael78
3249 Registered Users |
|
|
11 Registered (Amadeus, Athanasius The L, dochawk, Epiphanius, ItalianPapist, John Murray, Pani Rose, Penthaetria, Pseudo-Athanasius, Yuhannon, 1 invisible),
60
Guests and
10
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
The Byzantine Forum also hosts these private forums:
The Deacon's Door (for deacons and deacon
candidates and their wives), the Orthodox Christian
Studies Forum (for currently enrolled students only of the distance education programs
offered by the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America) and
the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church Clergy Forum
(for clergy, religious, and clergy wives of that Church). Contact an administrator for
access.
|
|
3249 Members
20 Forums
22514 Topics
292717 Posts
Max Online: 1087 @ 07/16/07 01:09 PM
|
|
|
#295459 - 07/17/08 06:20 PM
Just a Quick Aside
|
Member
Registered: 10/07/07
Posts: 156
Loc: Orange County CA.
|
Hey all,
I haven't been here on the forum for quite some time now (April) as I've been really busy with life in general. That being said there are a few things I've seen said here in this specific sub-forum regarding former Latin Rite Catholics and the Revised Divine Liturgy. The impression I get is that the common opinion is that former Latins or Latins who attend Byzantine Rite parishes in the Metropolia of Pittsburgh don't give a flying *care* about what has happened to the liturgy. This I can assure you is far from the case. I attend a Ruthenian parish and 60-70% of the congregation like me are either former Latins, Latins in transition to the Ruthenian Rite, or Latins who just like going to the East and guess what....we don't like what has been done to the liturgy either. We want what we once had. The awkward melodies, the gender neutral language, the abrogation of the liturgy in general are all things that we are trying to get away from, if we wanted such changes then why would we be going Eastward? We could get all of that along with corny liturgical folk music, communion being handed out like it's candy rather than the body of Christ by everyone but the priest, liturgical dancing, and etc. etc. etc. in many of the local Roman Rite parishes. However we don't want that, we want the beauty of the East in its fullness. Some of us have even left the Ruthenian Rite community and sought our transfers elsewhere, I've dabbled with looking into the Melkite Greek Church, returned to the Ruthenian, and am currently petitioning to canonically transfer to the Ukrainian Greek Church while attending my Ruthenian parish (I can't go to the UGCC every week because it's too far away for me to afford to attend b/c of gas prices....eek!). Lest I digress (even more than I may have already) I guess I just wanted to impress upon those who think that the non-cradle Byzantines don't care about the what is happening to the Ruthenian Church, we do and many of us are beginning to vote on it with our feet, while others choose to stay and fight along with their cradle-Byzantines for the fullness of the Ruthenian liturgy and spirituality. I hope I haven't offended anyone here with what I've said but I just felt it needed to be said.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#295478 - 07/17/08 11:13 PM
Re: Just a Quick Aside
[Re: christos_anesti]
|
Member
Registered: 09/22/06
Posts: 160
Loc: Medina, OH
|
I'm saddened by your post. I was hoping the RDL was not going to chase away former Latins who feared another Vatican II. Based on your post, it appears to me that the people who identify themselves as Ruthenian as opposed to Eastern Catholic, will likely be the ones who will stay in the trenches and fight it out over a fuller Liturgy.
Though, I know many Ruthenians who have left for more sacred ground and are finding happy homes in the Orthodox or other Eastern Christian Churches.
The question is, who will be left?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#295487 - 07/18/08 01:31 AM
Re: Just a Quick Aside
[Re: Stephanie Kotyuh]
|
Member
Registered: 11/12/02
Posts: 915
Loc: Where we say men and mankind
|
I'm saddened by your post. I was hoping the RDL was not going to chase away former Latins who feared another Vatican II. Based on your post, it appears to me that the people who identify themselves as Ruthenian as opposed to Eastern Catholic, will likely be the ones who will stay in the trenches and fight it out over a fuller Liturgy.
Though, I know many Ruthenians who have left for more sacred ground and are finding happy homes in the Orthodox or other Eastern Christian Churches.
The question is, who will be left? Four Bishops, a handful of priests, and a remnant of what once used to be a proud Slavic Byzantine Catholic church. Continued prayers for my former church, and the restoration of the full Ruthenian recension.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#295744 - 07/21/08 02:33 PM
Re: Just a Quick Aside
[Re: christos_anesti]
|
Greco-Kat
Member
Registered: 11/03/01
Posts: 115
Loc: Arlington
|
I try not to yield too often to the temptation to read the posts on the RDL because it so saddens me to see how much bitterness has been generated by its promulgation, and how much more by the tumult of the comments. Nevertheless, I would offer these thoughts: Posters, across the spectrum of those concerned with this subject, should ask themselves if they are using the RDL as a surrogate for other issues that might better be debated on their own. Critics of the RDL should ask themselves how much of their discontent arises from the way in which it was introduced and how much from the product itself. Defenders of the RDL should ask themselves what might be done to open a genuine "family discussion" on the issue of the RDL and liturgical reform in the BCC. All should pause and consider where this wrangling is taking the BCC.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|