Mariya Diawara, henrikhank, Fr. Ronald Comeau, J Parrish, Vladimir Teodor, mikev23, docnerves, JMJ1991, MichaelLofton, McClure010, MelkiteofAnnapolis, WAL, Eastern Maronite, galadza, rsche
4355 Registered Users |
|
The Byzantine Forum also hosts these private forums:
The Deacon's Door (for deacons and deacon
candidates and their wives) and the Orthodox Christian
Studies Forum (for currently enrolled students only of the distance education programs
offered by the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America). Contact an administrator for
access at forum@byzcath.org.
|
|
4355 Members
26 Forums
29525 Topics
368758 Posts
Max Online: 1087 @ 07/16/07 01:09 PM
|
|
|
#322499 - 05/20/09 04:10 PM
Re: 1998 New Jerusalem Bible
[Re: monksilouan]
|
Member
Registered: 01/21/07
Posts: 421
Loc: Australia
|
It's now called "The Bible in its Traditions" and as late as mid-August 2008, there was only discussion of an imminant "demonstration volume". I have not heard anything further.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#322536 - 05/20/09 09:12 PM
Re: 1998 New Jerusalem Bible
[Re: Matta]
|
Member
Registered: 08/27/08
Posts: 162
Loc: Southeast USA
|
Nothing at all from the U.S. publisher, Doubleday, who publishes the 1966 (old) Jerusalem Bible and the New (but not the New, New) Jerusalem Bible. They have issued their Fall 2009 catalog and it is not in there.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#326631 - 07/04/09 10:02 PM
Re: 1998 New Jerusalem Bible
[Re: Ot'ets Nastoiatel']
|
Member
Registered: 02/13/07
Posts: 427
Loc: Tennessee
|
Forgive my ignorance, but I had not heard of this translation. May I ask how it differs from the Jerusalem and New Jerusalem Bibles?
Edited by ZAROVE (07/04/09 10:02 PM)
Edit Reason: Minor Error.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index