The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
SergLts, RusFrog, JanSorman, Icons, George, SJ
5653 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
2 registered members (seven_mansions, 1 invisible), 159 guests, and 207 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Byzantine Nebraska
Church of the Holy Trinity (UGCC) - Brazil
Papal Audience 10 November 2017
Upgraded Russian icon corner
Russian Greek Catholic Global Congress
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics34,865
Posts412,705
Members5,653
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
1937 TIME magazine Greek Catholic article #328400 07/24/09 04:49 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Etnick Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Here's an interesting article about the celibacy struggle.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,758558,00.html

Re: 1937 TIME magazine Greek Catholic article [Re: Etnick] #328405 07/24/09 05:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
T
The young fogey Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
Fascinating! Thanks. That's the Chornock split in a nutshell (no mention of the similar Toth one about 40 years earlier) but who else sees poor journalism and an anti-Roman bias including in the physical description of Takach? Why not describe Chornock physically as well?

Re: 1937 TIME magazine Greek Catholic article [Re: The young fogey] #328409 07/24/09 06:08 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
S
StuartK Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
it's interesting that they point to one million Ruthenians. This probably includes the Ukrainian Greek Catholics as well, since I don't think the jurisdictions had split at the time. But when you consider that on a good day there are perhaps 80,000 Ruthenian Byzantine Catholics in America, the damage done in the celibacy conflicts is apparent.

By the way, although the article gets some of the details wrong, as compared to how Time covers religion today, the article is a model of objectivity and insight.

Re: 1937 TIME magazine Greek Catholic article [Re: StuartK] #328410 07/24/09 06:14 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
T
The young fogey Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
I think the jurisdictions split in 1924.

Re: 1937 TIME magazine Greek Catholic article [Re: The young fogey] #328412 07/24/09 07:42 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Etnick Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,134
Originally Posted by The young fogey
Fascinating! Thanks. That's the Chornock split in a nutshell (no mention of the similar Toth one about 40 years earlier) but who else sees poor journalism and an anti-Roman bias including in the physical description of Takach? Why not describe Chornock physically as well?


I was a little surprised when they called him "fat and gimlet eyed". That sure as heck wouldn't fly today.

Re: 1937 TIME magazine Greek Catholic article [Re: Etnick] #328416 07/24/09 09:44 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
S
StuartK Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Quote
I was a little surprised when they called him "fat and gimlet eyed". That sure as heck wouldn't fly today.


"Dignified and alert"--would that do the trick? I've seen pictures of him. He was fat and gimlet-eyed. One of the things I like about old-school journalism is its lack of euphemism and circumlocution in the name of political correctness.

As to why Chornock was not described, I suggest that the reporter never met him, and did not have a picture on file. Pre-plane travel, pre-internet. No bias--or rather, from the WASP perspective of the time, both Catholic and Orthodox Slavs were essentially shifty foreigners. You wouldn't let your daughter marry one.


The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2020 (Forum 1998-2020). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3