Vinolentus, RusOrthCath, Cavaradossi, Roman Interloper, ftbond, NitaMacdonald1930, SOL, etomaria, Kostyantyn, Benny, Ivanov325, DocH, andria, Joe Smith, CanuckK8
4466 Registered Users |
|
|
10 registered (Pavloosh, Carson Daniel, Scotty, jvenner, Peter J, Polish American, sielos ilgesys, Thessalonius Monk, DogoCanario, 1 invisible),
170
Guests and
4
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
4466 Members
26 Forums
30164 Topics
373780 Posts
Max Online: 1087 @ 07/16/07 01:09 PM
|
|
|
#355547 - 11/06/10 07:26 PM
Re: Ruthenian latinizations
[Re: Administrator]
|
Member
Registered: 05/22/07
Posts: 1515
Loc: MD
|
What exactly were the "innovations" introduce in the Diocese of Chelm? There is always a tendency to assume that the Orthodox usage was correct and the Greek Catholic usage incorrect but that is not always true. I think we would need to have a good knowledge of the specific liturgical issues in order to put this document in context. My read of this is that the liturgical issues (serious as they were) were but a symptom of larger issues in the diocese at that time.
Here is a convenient on-line source: Religion and nationality in Western Ukraine: the Greek Catholic Church and Ruthenian National Movement in Galicia, 1867-1900 By John-Paul Himka ( link ) Starting at page 42, The Conflict in Przemysl, but see especially page 57 The Conversion of the Chlem Eparchy to Orthodoxy.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#355548 - 11/06/10 07:26 PM
Re: Ruthenian latinizations
[Re: Administrator]
|
Member
Registered: 11/03/01
Posts: 1822
Loc: Oregon
|
The closest I can come up with as far as a list is this which was prepared for this article by Fr. Serge Keleher: In principle Greek-Catholics retain the Eastern Orthodox tradition in matters of spirituality, theology, liturgy and discipline, but in practice the Greek-Catholic Churches have usually been severely romanised or 'latinised' in each of these areas. The Greek-Catholics in the Kholm diocese had endured a heavy dose of this 'latinisation'. By the middle of the nineteenth century the churches did not have iconscreens; the altar tables were fixed to the wall (which makes the processions and incensations that are necessary for the Byzantine liturgical tradition impossible); numerous Roman Catholic devotional practices and liturgical furnishings had been introduced everywhere; and the liturgical texts had been seriously altered in a romanising direction. The churches were furnished with organs, confessionals, and monstrances; various Roman Catholic devotions such as the feast of Corpus Christi, the blessing of fire, the Holy Hour, the Rosary, and the Stations of the Cross were in common use. The Greek-Catholic priests dressed and groomed themselves like Roman Catholic clergy. By the latter part of the nineteenth century the Greek-Catholics in the Kholm diocese had lost even the memory of much of their own authentic Orthodox tradition. The principle of "correction" of the Byzantine liturgy was mentioned by Pius IX earlier in In suprema Petri apostoli sede: We ask of you only those things that are strictly necessary: return to unity; agree with us in the profession of the true faith that the Catholic Church holds and teaches; and, along with that of the whole Church itself, maintain communion with the supreme see of Peter. With respect to your sacred rites, only those things found in them contrary to catholic faith and unity are subject to correction. Once remedied in this regard, your ancient Eastern liturgies will remain unchanged. Personally, I am not inclined to think that Pius IX had all the things from Fr. Serge's article above in mind. Perhaps Fr. Serge could comment if he catches this discussion?
Edited by DTBrown (11/06/10 07:29 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#355569 - 11/07/10 03:09 PM
Re: Ruthenian latinizations
[Re: ajk]
|
Member
Registered: 11/11/01
Posts: 1269
Loc: PA
|
Here is a convenient on-line source: Religion and nationality in Western Ukraine: the Greek Catholic Church and Ruthenian National Movement in Galicia, 1867-1900 By John-Paul Himka ( link ) Starting at page 42, The Conflict in Przemysl, but see especially page 57 The Conversion of the Chlem Eparchy to Orthodoxy. Fr Deacon Tony, I tried the link; it only displays to p32. Can you give us some quotes or idea of the details?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#355583 - 11/08/10 03:14 AM
Re: Ruthenian latinizations
[Re: Paul B]
|
Member
Registered: 05/22/07
Posts: 1515
Loc: MD
|
Fr. Deacon Paul,
There is a content link near the top and to the left (under the heading Religion and nationality in Western Ukraine: the Greek Catholic Church and ... By John-Paul Himka). In the content drop-down menu there should be a link to page 42, The Conflict in Przemysl; click on it. From there, page 42, use the arrows next to the content link to page ahead. This worked for me.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#355592 - 11/08/10 12:38 PM
Re: Ruthenian latinizations
[Re: Paul B]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 03/20/08
Posts: 10
Loc: California
|
Reading the "Conversion of Chelm" chapter in Himka, it seems that the "innovations" refered to in OMNEM SOLLICITUDINEM are actually the attempt by the new administrator of the eparchy to purify the ritual of "... all the Latin-Polish admixtures inappropriate to it and of arbitraty deformities." But Himka doesn't detail the specific latinizations.
It's interestiing that the people of many parishes wanted desperately to keep their latinizations: (from Himka, p. 58)
"In numerous parishes the parishioners refused to accept the purified ritual and made their refusal known by such acts as dragging the pastor out of the church, taking the church keys away from him, or packing all his belongings in a cart in front of the rectory..."
Note that those of us didn't take kindly to the RDL have exhibited a rather milder reaction...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#355593 - 11/08/10 12:45 PM
Re: Ruthenian latinizations
[Re: jjp]
|
Member
Registered: 11/09/01
Posts: 6017
Loc: Falls Church, VA
|
It could also be that many of the "purifications" represented russifications; i.e., imposition of a Nikonian liturgy in place of the pre-Nikonian rite used by the "Ruteni". But without additional information, it is impossible to tell.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#355595 - 11/08/10 01:00 PM
Re: Ruthenian latinizations
[Re: StuartK]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 03/20/08
Posts: 10
Loc: California
|
It could also be that many of the "purifications" represented russifications; i.e., imposition of a Nikonian liturgy in place of the pre-Nikonian rite used by the "Ruteni". But without additional information, it is impossible to tell. Good point, Stuart, that I hadn't considered.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|