The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Galumph, Leon_C, Rocco, Hvizsgyak, P.W.
5,984 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 238 guests, and 46 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,389
Posts416,722
Members5,984
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 396
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 396
Read excerpts from Hitler's 1939 "Greater Germany Reichstag" speech and then read Putin's recent comments.

Greater German Reichstag [germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org] http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=2289

Here is the background of that speech from the site.

With the dawning of the year 1939, Germany’s war preparations in the areas of armaments, economics, and diplomacy entered into their critical end phase. These preparations were also accompanied by intensified propaganda efforts. In this famous Reichstag speech, delivered on the 6th anniversary of his takeover of power, Hitler emphasizes his own wish for peace – one that apparently existed despite the Jews’ alleged international conspiracy against the German people. In advance, he presents the outbreak of war – which he himself would actually prompt a few months later – as Germany’s way of defending itself against Jewish aggression, and he promises retribution. It is unlikely that the Nazi regime had any concrete plans for the actual “annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe” at this time. But it must have been clear that war and the conquest of territory that it would entail in Eastern Europe, home to millions of Jews, would require the Nazis to formulate new policies toward the Jews.

Here is part of the excerpt:

" [...] On January 30, 1933, I moved into Wilhelmstraße, filled with the deepest concern for the future of my Volk [people]. Today – six years later – I am able to speak to the first Reichstag of Greater Germany! We, perhaps more than any other generation, can truly appreciate the full meaning of the pious expression: ‘What a change brought about by the grace of God!’

Six years were enough to achieve the dreams of centuries. One year to bring our people the enjoyment of that unity that so many generations strove for in vain. Today, as I see you assembled around me as representatives of our German Volk from all Gaue [regions] of the Reich, and know that among you are the newly elected men of the Ostmark [Austria] and the Sudetenland, I am once more overwhelmed by the powerful impressions of the events of a year in which the work of centuries was realized.

How much blood has been shed in vain for this goal! Over the course of more than a thousand years, how many millions of German men have consciously or unconsciously traveled down the bitter road toward a quick or painful death in the service of this goal! How many others were condemned to end their lives behind the walls of fortresses and prisons – lives they would have gladly given to Greater Germany! .......

[.....] This process lasted nearly 2,000 years, until scattered tribes became one Volk, countless lands and states one Reich. Now, the growth process of the German nation can be seen as having essentially come to an end. The Greater German Reich, however, encompasses the entire thousand-year life-struggle of our Volk.

Just as all streams of German blood flow into it, it unites in itself all past traditions, its symbols and banners and, above all, the great men of whom Germans of the past were once justly proud.

For no matter what camp they belonged to in their day, the bold dukes and great kings, the generals and mighty emperors, and around them the shining minds and heroes of the past, they were all merely instruments of providence in the process of creating a nation.

By embracing them with grateful reverence in this great Reich, the glorious richness of German history opens up to us. Let us thank Almighty God that he has blessed our generation and us to witness this time and this hour."

The whole thing is chilling but way it reflects the thinking behind the "Russian mir" cannot be ignored.


Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
D
DMD Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
I agree, but I wonder how deeply a warmongering mentality really runs within the Russian Military command. That, and the oligarchs fear of being locked out of western money markets, would seem to serve as constraints on further wide ranging Russian expansionist ambitions. The dreadful lessons and costs of the "Great Patriotic War" are drilled into the Russian officer corps and, just as they were a counter-weight to Soviet ideologues in the Cold War, I suspect their successors have no appetite for a mutually destructive war

Time shall tell.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 2
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 2
Quote
how deeply a warmongering mentality really runs within the Russian Military command.
Deeper than you might think. The Russian military still retains the Soviet mindset that it is one of the three pillars of the state (the other two being the Party and the Secret Police). Since Gorbachev's perestroika, the military has seen its prestige and social position seriously downgraded. Under Putin, the military has been systematically starved for funding, and (with the exception of the Strategic Rocket Forces) has been reduced to a hollow shell (Most of the $70 billion Russian defense budget goes to strategic systems and to high-visibility, high-prestige items such as a stealth fighter, a new nuclear submarine and an aircraft carrier. On top of that, the Russian Ministry of Defense estimates that upwards of a fourth of the defense budget is either wasted or stolen each year).

Therefore, the Russian military has been itching for some time to show its relevance in Russian foreign policy, as well as to recoup its reputation, seriously undermined by its poor performance in Georgia back in 2008 (Putin makes it a habit to invade Orthodox countries, doesn't he?).

Whether ALL Russian generals think this way is not clear, but a large percentage of them do. Whether they will act on their desire is also uncertain. What is certain is they should be careful about what they wish--because they might get it.

My considered assessment at this point is Ukraine could easily become more of a tar baby for Russia than Afghanistan was in the 1980s, or Chechnya is today. Ukraine has large and capable armed forces, and nothing would unite the population more than a Russian invasion. Russia simply doesn't have enough combat-ready forces to guarantee a walkover in Ukraine, and a slogging match could rapidly lead to the collapse of the Russian army, which is not capable, at this time, of waging a sustained, high-intensity war.

And, if the army goes down, Putin will go with it.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 2
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 2
Quote
just as they were a counter-weight to Soviet ideologues in the Cold War, I suspect their successors have no appetite for a mutually destructive war

That's not a true depiction of how the Soviet officer corps thought. In fact, right up to the final collapse of the USSR, the General Staff was planning for waging and winning a general war on the NATO Central Front. The Soviet military was fully convinced of its ability to fight and win even a nuclear war with the United States, and never signed on to the concept of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). In the brief window during which the Soviet military archives were open, enough documentation was copied and brought into the West to provide stunning insights into how they viewed events from their side of the hill. And what they proved more than anything was the fallacy of mirror imaging--do not assume that the adversary is thinking as you do, or holds the same hierarchy of values that you do.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 157
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 157
Originally Posted by DMD
Putin and his "Russky Mir" ideologue buddies Dugin (?) and the Russian Patriarch should take note that there are no more ethnic Germans in Sudatenland and Prussia - to the extent that Germanic town names and street names are eradicated from memory - (Danzig is Gdansk and so on.)

There is no more Prussia.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
D
DMD Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
I will defer to your area of expertise...a bit of Tom Clancyish mirror imaging on my part I suppose...

So... did their debacle, followed by our experience in the muck of Afghanistan, at all color the strategic thinking of the younger generation of post soviet officers in terms of fighting - not starting - a hot war on another nation's territory - those men who ought to be the equivalent of at least Brigadiers, full Colonels and Naval Captains by now?

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 2
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 2
The Russian military is top-heavy with superannuated generals and colonels. They don't have an "up-or-out" policy, and since senior rank carries with it a lot of juicy perks (including first shot at opportunities for graft and corruption, access to opulent quarters, and decent pay for not much work), they hang on for dear life. Attempts to reduce the size of the officer corps and retire large numbers of generals have all failed, because, while the army may not be able to conquer countries that shoot back, it's more than capable of overthrowing the government if it gets riled. So, Putin accepts military inefficiency and waste in order to appease senior military leaders who might become threats to the regime. He can't live with them, but he literally cannot live without them.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
D
DMD Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
Originally Posted by StuartK
The Russian military is top-heavy with superannuated generals and colonels. They don't have an "up-or-out" policy, and since senior rank carries with it a lot of juicy perks (including first shot at opportunities for graft and corruption, access to opulent quarters, and decent pay for not much work), they hang on for dear life. Attempts to reduce the size of the officer corps and retire large numbers of generals have all failed, because, while the army may not be able to conquer countries that shoot back, it's more than capable of overthrowing the government if it gets riled. So, Putin accepts military inefficiency and waste in order to appease senior military leaders who might become threats to the regime. He can't live with them, but he literally cannot live without them.

So the military and the Church are burdened with senior leadership of a generation long retired in the west? That explains much....

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Quote
Read excerpts from Hitler's 1939 "Greater Germany Reichstag" speech and then read Putin's recent comments.

Putin may be pugnacious, cynical, tyrannical, autocratic, corrupt [fill in the blank], but he's not a Nazi; and Russia is not the Third Reich in intent, outlook, or most importantly in capability. Those comparisons and others being made by our political leaders I think are fairly lazy and myopic. It is of course also highly ironic. This [aljazeera.com] opinion piece on Al Jazeera I think summarizes why the comparison is a poorly thought out one.

I'm not sure what this pivot to Ukraine will mean to places where our more significant strategic interests lie. Certainly it is not looking good, and our attention seems to be shifting away, from the places where we have paid a substantial cost in blood and treasure. It can only re-affirm in my own mind that I have no idea what our actual foreign policy objectives are.

Last edited by AMM; 03/22/14 11:09 AM.
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,226
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,226
Originally Posted by AMM
It can only re-affirm in my own mind that I have no idea what our actual foreign policy objectives are.

There are no foreign policy objectives....or economic objectives. This administration is flailing in the wind. Oh wait....I almost forgot....there are a few things they believe in....

Abortion
Gay "marriage"
Legal pot
ObamaCare

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
D
DMD Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
What is your point? We support Russia because we dislike Obama?

Abortion is legal and widespread in Russia despite government efforts to reduce it. http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE9AO0VO20131125?irpc=932

Heath care delivery in Russia is problematic http://www.rand.org/pubs/conf_proceedings/CF124/CF124.chap5.html

Drug abuse is as epidemic as in the west. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/12/russia-drug-abuse_n_1667786.html

Religious freedom is problematic there. http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/essays/religious-freedom-in-russia

A forum like this where widely, but respectful disagreement flourishes is increasingly rare and prosecutions based on opinion posts are increasingly common.


None of this is relevant however to the aspirations of Ukrainian citizens, is it?

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,226
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,226
Originally Posted by DMD
What is your point?

My point? I'll say it again.

We have a very weak administration. They care about nothing except keeping abortion-on-demand-legal....championing gay "marriage"....legalizing pot......ramming ObamaCare down our throats....and the ever important green energy. There is no foreign policy....there is no economic policy. They cannot help Ukraine or oppose Russia. They are incompetent and impotent.

Originally Posted by DMD
We support Russia because we dislike Obama?

Huh?

Last edited by Recluse; 03/22/14 04:05 PM.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
D
DMD Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
^ Non sequitur. You're neither responsive to the original post or the related discussion.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,226
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,226
Originally Posted by DMD
^ Non sequitur. You're neither responsive to the original post or the related discussion.

Yeah....non sequitur...red herring....straw man....dicto simpliciter.......whatever. You don't need to respond to my posts if you don't like them. wink

But my point is related to what can be learnt from Ukraine's plight. America will not intervene and Putin plays Obama like a violin....that's one thing I learnt.

Last edited by Recluse; 03/22/14 09:19 PM.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,391
Likes: 30
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,391
Likes: 30
Dear Recluse,

I agree with you totally.

Alex

Last edited by Orthodox Catholic; 03/24/14 10:03 PM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Irish Melkite, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2023). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5