The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Galumph, Leon_C, Rocco, Hvizsgyak, P.W.
5,984 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 456 guests, and 39 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,389
Posts416,722
Members5,984
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#418350 06/26/18 07:03 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1
I
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
I
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1
Greetings,

I was wondering, can two Roman Catholics have their marriage con-validated in a Byzantine Church? Is a special dispensation from the Latin Bishop necessary?

Was having this discussion with a friend and was curious.

Thanks!

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator
Member
Offline
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
The couple would need “permission” from the local Latin ordinary, not dispensation. The local ordinary would delegate the Byzantine priest to witness the marriage. There must be some compelling reason for the permission to be granted (for example, the parties are members of the Byzantine parish).

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 30
ajk Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 30

This is what I figured too. Would they (two Roman Catholics) be considered members of a Byzantine parish or just attending the parish? Does membership of a parish in the sense of canon law (whatever the terminology there) imply membership, in the strict theological sense, in an eparchy/diocese and, therefore, membership in a sui iuris church?

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator
Member
Offline
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Baptism determines ascription in a particular sui juris Catholic Church. Membership in a parish is different than ascription in a a particular Church. Normally, one would be a member of a parish of the particular Church in which he/she is ascribed.

The is a formal process for one who wants to change one’s Church ascription; it is more than filling out a membership form at a parish.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 30
ajk Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 30

Originally Posted by Deacon John Montalvo
Baptism determines ascription in a particular sui juris Catholic Church. Membership in a parish is different than ascription in a a particular Church. Normally, one would be a member of a parish of the particular Church in which he/she is ascribed.

The is a formal process for one who wants to change one’s Church ascription; it is more than filling out a membership form at a parish.
Exactly. A Latin church couple has their child baptized in a Byzantine parish: the child is a member of the Latin church not the Byzantine. The parents and child attend a Byzantine parish exclusively: they are members of the Latin church.

There are no freelance Catholics, all are members of a church, that is, a diocese or eparchy, a particular church, a community with a bishop. What of validly baptized Christians that worship in an ecclesial community that is not such a church? Must they not in some way be considered ascribed to a particular church?

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator
Member
Offline
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Validly baptized non-Catholic Christians are not ascribed to a sui iuris Church until those Christians come into full communion with the Catholic Church.

With and only with ascription the Christian faithful of the Catholic Church acquire certain rights and obligations.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 30
ajk Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 30

Originally Posted by Deacon John Montalvo
Validly baptized non-Catholic Christians are not ascribed to a sui iuris Church until those Christians come into full communion with the Catholic Church.
I understand this in law. For a theology, focusing on the importance and necessity of the particular church as the fundamental basis of the eucharistic community, as expressed for instance by Zizioulas as I understand him, it is not so clear.

Originally Posted by Deacon John Montalvo
With and only with ascription the Christian faithful of the Catholic Church acquire certain rights and obligations.
Yes. My question is about those other baptized, Christians, who are understood as not in the category of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus, outside the church no salvation.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator
Member
Offline
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
I understood your question, Church ascription is a canonical term that only pertains to those Christian faithful in FULL communion with the Catholic Church.

Validly baptized non-Catholic Christians are not in full communion with the Catholic Church (the Vatican II Fathers noted this as “imperfect communion”), and as a result would not need to be ascribed to a particular sui iuris Church.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 30
ajk Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 30
And I understand your point. To elaborate on mine: good canon law is good applied theology but it can also not rise to the level of theological precision or fullness of expression. So I'm wanting to be further enlightened about details of that "imperfect communion" and how it fits into ecclesiology, the Church, and by that I understand the Church as a eucharistic community of many eucharistic communities -- a Church of churches to use the words of J.-M.R. Tillard.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Moderator
Member
Offline
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,688
Ok, consult the original sources, for instance this:

http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_..._19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 30
ajk Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 30

Thanks Fr. Deacon, I'll take another look at them. It is the theological underpinnings of the sources that my questions attempt to probe.

Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 8
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 8
Originally Posted by Deacon John Montalvo
The couple would need “permission” from the local Latin ordinary, not dispensation. The local ordinary would delegate the Byzantine priest to witness the marriage. There must be some compelling reason for the permission to be granted (for example, the parties are members of the Byzantine parish).

Is "we want to wear nice crowns" a valid reason, Father Deacon?


Moderated by  Irish Melkite 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2023). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5