The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Ioannes Errikos, Deacon Christopher, Eldho Kuriakose, Nixon, SHolmes
5633 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (1 invisible), 191 guests, and 163 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Byzantine Nebraska
Church of the Holy Trinity (UGCC) - Brazil
Papal Audience 10 November 2017
Upgraded Russian icon corner
Russian Greek Catholic Global Congress
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics34,819
Posts412,383
Members5,633
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
No Bread, No Wine? #50547 01/16/04 06:47 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Logos - Alexis Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Dear Forum Members,

I learned recently that, in some exceptional and extremely necessary cases, non-alcholic "wine" and "bread" with no gluten can be consecrated for those struggling with alcohol addiction and who are allergic to gluten.

Do any of the Eastern Orthodox or Eastern Catholic Churches practice this?

I find it very odd, personally. I mean, apparently worked without these exceptions for 2000 years. Can non-alcholic "wine" and "bread" sans gluten even be consecrated?

What are your Byzantine practices and views?

Logos Teen

Re: No Bread, No Wine? #50548 01/16/04 07:20 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,680
Deacon John Montalvo Offline
Moderator
Member
Offline
Moderator
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,680
TOTIL,

The non-alcoholic wine is known as "mustum", though I thought this was no longer used. It was allowed for priests.

In our Byzantine parish, we had a women (may her memory be eternal) who was an alcoholic, but consumed both species, because she no longer considered the wine as wine but the Blood of Our Lord. Some of her AA friends were alarmed, but I certainly would not question her faith. Others who might be allergic to gluten would partake of the Holy Blood. In the past before I was ordained, I've seen Father reserve a Particle and not place It in the Cup, perhaps this person suffered from alcoholism, but I do not know.

Re: No Bread, No Wine? #50549 01/16/04 07:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 202
L
Little Green Coat Offline
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 202
If I recall, Should a priest run out of the consecrated bread while distributing communion the consecrated wine is the complete body of the Lord. The same is true if the priest should run out of the consecrated wine the consecrated bread is our Lord.

So if one has trouble with alchol then taking the consecrated bread is the Lord. And vis a versa.

Re: No Bread, No Wine? #50550 01/16/04 07:28 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Logos - Alexis Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Father Deacon John,

Perhaps it is no longer aloud. My RCIA directress just mentioned it in passing a couple of nights ago. She used the present tense, so I assumed it was still being practiced. Nonetheless, I've never seen this practice at my parish or any other, for that matter.

Logos Teen

Re: No Bread, No Wine? #50551 01/16/04 07:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461
Diak Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461
Dear Teen, we have three recovering alcoholics at our parish and while all are fastidious now (one is even his local AA group leader) neither have ever expressed even a word about the use of wine.

I doubt seriously any Orthodox church would seriously consider consecrating non-alcoholic wine. Even with the gluten issue, if the communicant made the situation known to the pastor, I am sure he would accomodate with a very small portion of the Holy Body.

Re: No Bread, No Wine? #50552 01/16/04 08:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,571
O
Our Lady's slave Offline
Member
Offline
Member
O
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,571
Teen

One of our Extraordinary Ministers has a bad gluten intolerance - she Receives only from the Chalice

Re: No Bread, No Wine? #50553 01/16/04 10:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 522
N
no one Offline
Member
Offline
Member
N
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 522
As for the use of "mustum" in the Latin Church, it is valid matter, but may or may not be licit...depending on the circumstances and whether or not the celebrant had the necessary permission to use it. Except in extreme circumstances (i.e. to consecrate the Sacred Species in order to provide Viaticum for someone in danger of death) a special indult is required. There was a time when Rome gave them out frequently or even gave permission for diocescan bishops to do so, but I understand this is no longer the case. Don

Re: No Bread, No Wine? #50554 01/17/04 12:11 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
I
incognitus Offline
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
It is true that the Holy See no longer gives the indult for the clergy to celebrate the Eucharist using non-alcoholic "wine", although I believe that those who have already received such an indult are permitted to continue to do so. Lay communicants are another matter; those who are allergic to gluten may receive only the Precious Blood and those who for one reason or another find it inadvisable (for serious reasons) to receive the Precious Blood may request and receive Holy Communion in the form of Bread alone.
The observation that the Precious Blood is not "wine" is theologically accurate. We may speak by analogy of the Body of Christ as "Bread", because the Lord Jesus Christ is the Bread of Life, but it is not proper to speak of "wine" after the Anaphora.
Incognitus

Re: No Bread, No Wine? #50555 01/23/04 05:05 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 49
Danj Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 49
Quote
It is true that the Holy See no longer gives the indult for the clergy to celebrate the Eucharist using non-alcoholic "wine", although I believe that those who have already received such an indult are permitted to continue to do so.
So, what's a priest or deacon supposed to do if they are in recovery for alcoholism?? What if this wine on a daily or weekly basis is what "sends them off on a bender"? Let's face it, we believe it to be the Blood of Christ, yet the fact remains that there is still alcohol in it. Would a priest/deacon then have to be removed from priesthood since they cannot tolerate alcohol? Seems to me this is a medieval view of the disease of alcoholism if the church cannot accomodate someone who suffers from it in light of modern medical advances (ie: total abstinence is usually the best method to combat this disease).
In Christ,
Dan

Re: No Bread, No Wine? #50556 01/24/04 12:19 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
I
incognitus Offline
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
I was stating the position of the Holy See regarding non-alcoholic wine; I was not attempting either to defend or to criticize that position. But there do exist problems which must be solved by virtue, not by technology.
On the other side of the coin, so to speak, there is a blanket permission to celebrate the eucharist with "wine" made on-the-spot with raisins (I'm not making this up!). The alcohol content of such dubious vino must be minimal to zero (it probably tastes horrid, but that's a different dicussion).
Talk about tasting horrid, at a large exhibition of various and sundry items of Christian paraphernalia (liturgicalia?) I once sampled a small swig of non-alcoholic communion wine bottled for Protestants. It did indeed taste horrid.
Incognitus


Moderated by  Alice, Father Deacon Ed, theophan 

The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2020 (Forum 1998-2020). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3