The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Taylor, Randy Danielson, TAFrazer, PNCC Random Guy, Coldstream
5,769 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (theophan), 69 guests, and 31 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Church of the Holy Trinity (UGCC) - Brazil
Church of the Holy Trinity (UGCC) - Brazil
by Santiago Tarsicio, March 17
Papal Audience 10 November 2017
Papal Audience 10 November 2017
by JLF, November 10
Upgraded Russian icon corner
Upgraded Russian icon corner
by The young fogey, October 20
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,056
Posts414,078
Members5,769
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#52696 12/09/03 07:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 127
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 127
What is the Byzantine approach to this teaching? I have seen parishes that celebrate it and others who celebrate St. Anne giving birth to the Blessed Mother; or is there even an official East teaching?

Thanks for your responses.
+Peace,
V

#52697 12/09/03 09:36 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 438
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 438
Official Church Teaching:

Troparion Tone 4
Today the bonds of childlessness are loosed, for God has heard the prayers of Anne and Joachim. He promised against all hope that they would give birth to a divine Virgin from whom the Indescribable would be born as man, the same who ordered the angels to sing to her: Rejoice, O woman full of grace, the Lord is with you.

Kontakon Tone 4
Today the universe rejoices; for Anne conceived in a manner caused by God, and because the one born to her will give birth to the Word.

John, Deacon

#52698 12/11/03 04:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 212
G
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 212
Oh, if we are doing it this way then:

Dogmatik in the first tone:

Let us sing a hymn of praise to the Virgin Mary
Glory of the whole world!
She was herself formed by human seed,
yet she became the Mother of the Master,
the Gate of Heaven,
the theme of the angel's hymn and the beauty of the faithful...

Dogmats convey the highest level of theology to the avarage orthodox-christian.
J. Von Gardner writes how he experienced completely illiterate peoples in Carpathia-othodox and uniate- who were able to fight off conversion attempts by protestants and catholics by reciting dogmats from memory. It must have blown them away to encounter such profound and concrete theology in a back-woods part of the world, from people who they considered pagans.

I have often wondered how the greek-catholics could ever adopt the doctrine of the immaculate conception, since our hymns clearly state that "she was herself formed by human seed".
I now find myself using this dogmat in defense against my orthodox friends who confront me on the issue.

does this make any sense?

ilya


Ilya (Hooray for Orthodoxy!!)Galadza
#52699 12/11/03 05:16 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,051
Likes: 7
Global Moderator
Member
Offline
Global Moderator
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,051
Likes: 7
V

you might want to take a look at another ongoing related thread

I forget the name, but here\'s the link confused

Many years,

Neil


"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
#52700 12/11/03 06:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,505
Ilya
No Im sorry it doesnt make sense!
I dont see what "she who was born of human seed" has to do with a denial of the Immacualte Conception.
The taching of the Immaculate conception just simply states that in the normal conception process of conjugal love of the Righteous Joachim and Anna that God preserved their offspring the "Blessed Virgin Mary" from sin.
The East along with the West has always believed that Mary was all holy, spotless, and the sinless
ever virgin Mother of God.
It is that simple.
Not hard to understand at all.
Stephanos I

Perhaps it is difficult for those who want to make more of this than it is a teaching on the sinlessness of the Blessed Virgin Mary

#52701 12/11/03 07:06 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,184
Likes: 5
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,184
Likes: 5
Dear Stephanos,

My relative Gavshev has become so Orthodox smile

Good for him!

He's looking at the Immaculate Conception the way an Orthodox Christian would.

If the Mother of God was born naturally the way we were, but in holiness (as we are not), then she would be under the law of death and so could not be said to be "without Original Sin."

But however either Church begins the discussion on this, BOTH affirm that the Mother of God was conceived in holiness and that even the faintest shadow of imperfection dared not come near her.

Alex

#52702 12/11/03 09:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,239
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,239
Dear Brethren,

Of course, we have visited this earlier. But as a reminder of the true Eastern Tradition:

The Eastern Orthodox Church chants every morning at Matins in the Evlogitaria that Christ "is the only sinless one."

I challenge anyone to produce a liturgical text that refers to Mary as "anamartitos" or "sinless" (in Greek).

If she were sinless, she would not have died and we would not have a feast called "The Dormition."

But you've heard all of this before.

Orthodoxy recognizes two Immaculate Conceptions: that of Mary by her parents and that of John the Forerunner by his parents. These were conceptions as God intended conception to be: full of love for each other, with hope for children, without malice, lust, greed, etc.

The procreations resulting from these Immaculate Conceptions (Mary the Theotokos and John the Forerunner) could not escape the inheritance of Original Sin, which is mortality.

We can go round and around regarding whether or not the Most/All Holy Theotokos had "personal" sins. (John Chrysostom and Basil said "yes," but that they were minor ones. Pelagios said that she would "answer" before God for her sins like the rest of us. Numerous others have said that she had no personal sins.) But what we cannot escape is that she was conceived and born subject to the tendency to sin and subject to its end result, death. Thus, we may not call her "anamartitos" or "sinless" since that is reserved for Christ who was not subject to the tendency to sin and not subject to death. As we recall, although immortal, He chose death for our sakes in the Garden at Gethsemane according to His father's will.

With love in Christ,
Andrew

#52703 12/11/03 09:50 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
? Well, Andrew, I was always taught that the Blessed Virgin was sinless. But it wasn't that she was "the same" as Christ, as some Protestants charge us with believing.

Christ is sinless by His very nature, and Mary is sinless by the grace of Christ. Everything she is, flows from Him.

As is the case with the rest of us. biggrin

#52704 12/12/03 05:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,239
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,239
Dear Theist Gal,

Does that mean that she was also immortal, by grace, of course.

In Christ,
Andrew

#52705 12/13/03 03:33 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
GAVSHEV commits the common error of confusing "Immaculate Conception" with "Virgin Birth"! They are not to be confused; that is certainly not what the Roman Church means by its doctrine...
Further, an unfallen nature does not necessarily mean a nature that is not subject to death. I am perhaps betraying my Latin theological formation here, but as I understand it , immortality is considered a preternatural gift, not intrinsic to an unfallen state. Indeed, the idea that Christ, as the new unfallen Adam, was only able to die because of a sort of miracle of the divine will was declared a heresy by the Western Church. I am new to thinking in Eastern categories, but it may help to view "death" in a less literal, physical, way.

#52706 12/13/03 03:38 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,716
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,716
I was taught that the Theotokos was personally sinless but was not preserved in some special way from sin before birth which would seperate Our Lady from the human race. In her free will, she was sinless which is the greater example in my book!

#52707 12/13/03 04:42 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
D
djs Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
Quote
I was taught that the Theotokos was personally sinless but was not preserved in some special way from sin before birth which would seperate Our Lady from the human race.
An interesting teaching. Of course this separation from the human race is like yours at baptism.

What really separates Mary from the human race is her absolutely unique role in the Incarnation of Christ. Not reflecting a lack of humaness, but being incomprehensibly extraordinary because of humaness.

Quote
In her free will, she was sinless which is the greater example in my book!
Which would make the Theotokos separate from the human race in that her own will was sufficient to avoid sin - a component of Pelagian heresey no?

#52708 12/13/03 04:46 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
D
djs Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
Quote
If she were sinless, she would not have died ...
Wait a minute, Andrew. Previously you advanced the idea - one of the several, different ideas that I've found in Orthodox catechisms on the OS subject - that we sin because we are mortal. Now you completely flip the proposition and say we are mortal because we sin?

#52709 12/13/03 04:33 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 438
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 438
daniel n said;

Quote
I am perhaps betraying my Latin theological formation here, but as I understand it , immortality is considered a preternatural gift, not intrinsic to an unfallen state. Indeed, the idea that Christ, as the new unfallen Adam, was only able to die because of a sort of miracle of the divine will was declared a heresy by the Western Church. I am new to thinking in Eastern categories, but it may help to view "death" in a less literal, physical, way.
If Christ died only as a condescension to his divine will then he really wasn't human after all. I don't think that this is just a heresy of the Western Church! wink

John

#52710 12/14/03 09:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,790
Maybe it is widespread; I encountered it among graduates of Thomas Aquinas College in California. It may not have been explicitly taught there, the students may have deduced it themselves. The reasoning went like this: Jesus is the New Adam. Adam, before the fall was not subject to death, therefore Christ was not subject to death as an unfallen man. However, he did die so it must have been a miracle of the divine will. But the Church specifically teaches that the doctrine of Christ's impassable [not subject to suffering and death] nature is a heresy. The error is in seeing immortality as intrinsic to an unfallen nature; it is not, it is an added gift, one that was not assumed by Christ in the Incarnation.
I used to get quite a kick out of proving these very conservative Latin Mass types were actually heretics...
Anyway, that brings us back to the question at hand. Brian makes the error of equating human nature with sin; it is not, sin is a lessening of our nature. And if Mary being without sin reduces her solidarity with humanity the same must be held of Christ. I think the error is in limiting "death" to corporeal death only. But this cannot be. In the book of Genesis God says to Adam that "in the day in which you eat" of the tree of knowledge of good and evil "you will die". Yet Adam did not physically die on that day; indeed he lived for what? nine hundred years? Certainly physical death is one effect of Adam's sin, but the more tragic effect was in the broken unity with the Holy Trinity. This unity was never lacking in Christ or our Blessed Lady.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Alice, Father Deacon Ed, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2020 (Forum 1998-2020). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5