|
3 members (Fr. Deacon Lance, 2 invisible),
311
guests, and
28
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,295
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21 |
Dear Dr John,
First of all, Happy New Year!
Secondly, that is all very nice, wedding feast analogies and all that.
Who says there should be one theological interpretation of this or that? Church bureaucrats, usually.
I heard this from our own church bureaucrats last night at our new year's levee for our bishops.
Again, theologians, academic and armchair (I belong to the latter or at least I have a paper mitre I sometimes wear when I am reading the "Eastern Churches' Review" and other items), tend to see things in a very idealized way.
We say that our idealized way is the way things SHOULD be, then we seem to assume that it is the way things are, in some way, and then we walk away satisfied.
In fact, we can call ourselves "Orthodox in communion with Rome," redefine Papal Primacy et al. all we want.
All of it is simply a mental construct that reflects not one iota of the administrative realities of contemporary church life.
Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 393
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 393 |
Slava Jesu Kristu,
I feel, however, that it is not the administrative things that really matter. The Spirit of Eastern Chrsitianity is where we must start. The structure will follow in its own course. Until we start thinking like real Byzantines (a process I see happening more and more), we will never achieve our goals. We are, however, slowly getting there in my opinion.
Dmitri
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21 |
Dear Dmitri, I agree! But that's O.K. for you to say, living in a warm climate as you do How are Mardi Gras preparations coming along? I also think Dr. John would appreciate hearing more about these as well! He really knows how to have a good time - a real achievement for a former Jesuit scholastic, wouldn't you say? Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 393
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 393 |
From an Eastern perspective, the warm climate presents a few problems for those of the Slavic traditions - namely cassock material. The Greeks know how to keep cool in this kind of weather but the Slavs seem to still be working on it. That being said, the city is preparing well. The band-stands are going up as I write this. My only real chore is to convince my fellow Ruthenians that they don't need to wear ashes on Ash Wednesday. Old habits, as good as they may be, die hard.
Dmitri
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21 |
Dear Dmitri,
And "Byzantine Mardi Gras" would have to be on the Saturday preceding the first Monday of the Great Fast, correct?
Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,103
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,103 |
I'm with you, BTW. This attempt to portray basic Catholic Teaching as specifically "Roman" or "Latin" makes no sense, IMHO. As you correctly note, Vatican I and Vatican II were not just for the Latin Church. They were for the Church Universal -- for all Catholics, both East and West.
reply: Yet the question wasn't who they were 'for' but rather who they were by. Vatican I did not represent the Traditional Eastern understanding of Primacy in the Church. There isn't a "double truth" -- one truth, one reality, for the East and another (contradictory) truth for the West. We may express our beliefs differently, but on the core Catholic beliefs, we believe the same. At least we're supposed to. And that's according to the Catechism.
reply: Which Catechism? Surely not one based on Vatican II? Because Vatican II taught that the Eastern Churches have a theology other than that of the Latin West. I don't believe in "double-truth" either. I believe in two limited human ways of expressing the same truth. As St. Gregory of Nyssa once said, "when it comes to speaking about God, every man is a liar." How much more can this be true when speaking of authority in the Church? And only one of those ways was expressed at Vatican I. If someone says, "You're just saying that because you're Latin," or "That's typical RCism," or whatever -- well, that's ad hominem: It's personalizing the argument. And it's simply untrue.
reply: Yes that's it, ChristTeen, just reject it out-right without even considering what they're saying. Whatever you do, don't listen to those dreadful "AD Hominems!" If you listen to them, they may "hokus pokus" you into some creepy Eastern Heresy. Eeew! Then you won't be able to call yourself a 'papist' anymore or a 'Catholic' because the two are synonymous. There are certain core things we believe because we're Catholic, not because we're Latin or Western. Petrine primacy is one of those things. It's kind of a defining thing for a Catholic -- hey, that's why our critics call us "papists." :p
reply: Eastern Catholics and Eastern Orthodox believe in Petrine Primacy too. We even believe in Old-Rome Primacy. We just have a different Traditional understanding of it. That's all. Being "living interpreters" of that Tradition, as H.H. John Paul II has called us, we will not abandon our Faith even if a Latin can argue us under the table with one hand and foot tied behind their Latin back.  Many of us are very open, although, to sitting down and comparing our two respective traditions, working together to find a form of Primacy acceptable to all the Apostolic Churches. Why don't we work for that? Wm.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,103
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,103 |
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic:
Who says there should be one theological interpretation of this or that? Church bureaucrats, usually.
I heard this from our own church bureaucrats last night at our new year's levee for our bishops.
Again, theologians, academic and armchair (I belong to the latter or at least I have a paper mitre I sometimes wear when I am reading the "Eastern Churches' Review" and other items), tend to see things in a very idealized way.
We say that our idealized way is the way things SHOULD be, then we seem to assume that it is the way things are, in some way, and then we walk away satisfied.
In fact, we can call ourselves "Orthodox in communion with Rome," redefine Papal Primacy et al. all we want.
All of it is simply a mental construct that reflects not one iota of the administrative realities of contemporary church life.
Alex reply: Doggone you're pessimistic, Alex. Was the bishop's meeting THAT bad??? All this pessisism has now made me depreseed. And to think, until you deflated me, I thought with my mental constructs I could convince this entire forum, all the ancinet Churches, all the world and even... ZOE! Oh well, I guess I'll just have to keep my idealized mental constructs for myself (at least, as you noted, it keeps me happy).  This reminds of a poem: Roses are red, violets are blue. I'm a schizophrenic and so am I.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678 |
I'm gonna make this forum a happy place if I have to knock every one of y'all's Eastern and Western heads with a hammer!  You stultior asinos! (That's way wrong but you know what I'm getting at...) May our Holy Father, St. Paul the First Hermit, pray for us unto God! ChristTeen287
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,698
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,698 |
Originally posted by ChristTeen287: [QUOTE]Personally, I see the Patriarch's refusal as a direct act of the Holy Spirit, just another example of how the Gates of Hell simply cannot prevail against the Church. I think this single act very much set into play the East's position on the Papacy. From this, it seems to me it's undeniable to say that the East didn't heavily effect Vatican I.
And certainly I don't approve of the Holy Father humiliating this outright act of the Holy Spirit. But if a simple Patriarch is going up against an infallible Pope whose official doctrinal proclamations are protected by that same Holy Spirit, then what?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678 |
But if a simple Patriarch is going up against an infallible Pope whose official doctrinal proclamations are protected by that same Holy Spirit, then what? Where did this happen in Vatican I? ChristTeen287
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21 |
Dear Ghazar, I'm sorry to sound pessimistic, Big Guy! Realism can sometimes be that way, a real bummer! And that tension between idealists like us  and church bureaucrats focused on the bottom line will persist. (And yes, the meeting was THAT bad!) But I'm upbeat today and ready to take on the world! Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21 |
Dear Qathuliqa Mor Ephrem,
This reminds me of what Bl. Pope John XXIII said:
I am only infallible when I speak 'ex cathedra.' And I will NEVER speak 'ex cathedra!"
Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678 |
I'm a total supporter of the Papal Infallibility...and I LOVE that quote! ChristTeen287
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21 |
Dear ChristTeen,
Good Pope John had a reputation as a bit of a jokester in his time.
He refused to eat alone, as was the papal custom, and he was very sociable and outgoing.
So much so, that Italian media began to criticize him for going out and about during the day too much.
The Pope said, "Well, fine! From now on, I'll only go out at night!"
And when he met with an ambassador to the Vatican, he asked how his family was.
"I'm a bachelor, Your Holiness!" came the reply.
"Ah, just like me!" said the Pope . . .
Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268 |
Dear Alex:
Since we are on Papal Infallibility again, is it still okay to repeat this old joke?
Oh, it's okay, for ChristTeen's sake!
Blessed Pope John XXIII loved to visit orphanages, hospices, and hospitals in and around Rome unannounced.
One day, he chose Christ Hospital, somewhere in the City, to pay a visit to the patients.
When the Mother Superior realized that His Holiness was already at the entrance to the Hospital, she rushed out and immediately greeted the Holy Father:
"Your Holiness, I am the Superior of Christ!"
"Good for you, Sister! I am only the Vicar of Christ!"
AmdG
|
|
|
|
|