The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Regf2, SomeInquirer, Wee Shuggie, Bodhi Zaffa, anaxios2022
5,881 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
2 members (2 invisible), 77 guests, and 19 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,295
Members5,881
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 8 of 11 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Dear Dr John,

First of all, Happy New Year!

Secondly, that is all very nice, wedding feast analogies and all that.

Who says there should be one theological interpretation of this or that? Church bureaucrats, usually.

I heard this from our own church bureaucrats last night at our new year's levee for our bishops.

Again, theologians, academic and armchair (I belong to the latter or at least I have a paper mitre I sometimes wear when I am reading the "Eastern Churches' Review" and other items), tend to see things in a very idealized way.

We say that our idealized way is the way things SHOULD be, then we seem to assume that it is the way things are, in some way, and then we walk away satisfied.

In fact, we can call ourselves "Orthodox in communion with Rome," redefine Papal Primacy et al. all we want.

All of it is simply a mental construct that reflects not one iota of the administrative realities of contemporary church life.

Alex

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 393
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 393
Slava Jesu Kristu,

I feel, however, that it is not the administrative things that really matter. The Spirit of Eastern Chrsitianity is where we must start. The structure will follow in its own course. Until we start thinking like real Byzantines (a process I see happening more and more), we will never achieve our goals. We are, however, slowly getting there in my opinion.

Dmitri

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Dear Dmitri,

I agree!

But that's O.K. for you to say, living in a warm climate as you do smile

How are Mardi Gras preparations coming along?

I also think Dr. John would appreciate hearing more about these as well! smile

He really knows how to have a good time - a real achievement for a former Jesuit scholastic, wouldn't you say? smile

Alex

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 393
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 393
From an Eastern perspective, the warm climate presents a few problems for those of the Slavic traditions - namely cassock material. The Greeks know how to keep cool in this kind of weather but the Slavs seem to still be working on it. That being said, the city is preparing well. The band-stands are going up as I write this. My only real chore is to convince my fellow Ruthenians that they don't need to wear ashes on Ash Wednesday. Old habits, as good as they may be, die hard.

Dmitri

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Dear Dmitri,

And "Byzantine Mardi Gras" would have to be on the Saturday preceding the first Monday of the Great Fast, correct?

Alex

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,103
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,103
Quote

I'm with you, BTW. This attempt to portray basic Catholic Teaching as specifically "Roman" or "Latin" makes no sense, IMHO. As you correctly note, Vatican I and Vatican II were not just for the Latin Church. They were for the Church Universal -- for all Catholics, both East and West.
reply: Yet the question wasn't who they were 'for' but rather who they were by. Vatican I did not represent the Traditional Eastern understanding of Primacy in the Church.

Quote

There isn't a "double truth" -- one truth, one reality, for the East and another (contradictory) truth for the West. We may express our beliefs differently, but on the core Catholic beliefs, we believe the same. At least we're supposed to. And that's according to the Catechism.
reply: Which Catechism? Surely not one based on Vatican II? Because Vatican II taught that the Eastern Churches have a theology other than that of the Latin West. I don't believe in "double-truth" either. I believe in two limited human ways of expressing the same truth. As St. Gregory of Nyssa once said, "when it comes to speaking about God, every man is a liar." How much more can this be true when speaking of authority in the Church? And only one of those ways was expressed at Vatican I.

Quote

If someone says, "You're just saying that because you're Latin," or "That's typical RCism," or whatever -- well, that's ad hominem: It's personalizing the argument. And it's simply untrue.
reply: Yes that's it, ChristTeen, just reject it out-right without even considering what they're saying. Whatever you do, don't listen to those dreadful "AD Hominems!" If you listen to them, they may "hokus pokus" you into some creepy Eastern Heresy. Eeew! Then you won't be able to call yourself a 'papist' anymore or a 'Catholic' because the two are synonymous. smile

Quote

There are certain core things we believe because we're Catholic, not because we're Latin or Western. Petrine primacy is one of those things. It's kind of a defining thing for a Catholic -- hey, that's why our critics call us "papists." :p
reply: Eastern Catholics and Eastern Orthodox believe in Petrine Primacy too. We even believe in Old-Rome Primacy. We just have a different Traditional understanding of it. That's all. Being "living interpreters" of that Tradition, as H.H. John Paul II has called us, we will not abandon our Faith even if a Latin can argue us under the table with one hand and foot tied behind their Latin back. smile Many of us are very open, although, to sitting down and comparing our two respective traditions, working together to find a form of Primacy acceptable to all the Apostolic Churches. Why don't we work for that?

Wm.

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,103
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,103
Quote
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic:

Who says there should be one theological interpretation of this or that? Church bureaucrats, usually.

I heard this from our own church bureaucrats last night at our new year's levee for our bishops.

Again, theologians, academic and armchair (I belong to the latter or at least I have a paper mitre I sometimes wear when I am reading the "Eastern Churches' Review" and other items), tend to see things in a very idealized way.

We say that our idealized way is the way things SHOULD be, then we seem to assume that it is the way things are, in some way, and then we walk away satisfied.

In fact, we can call ourselves "Orthodox in communion with Rome," redefine Papal Primacy et al. all we want.

All of it is simply a mental construct that reflects not one iota of the administrative realities of contemporary church life.

Alex
reply:
Doggone you're pessimistic, Alex. Was the bishop's meeting THAT bad??? All this pessisism has now made me depreseed. And to think, until you deflated me, I thought with my mental constructs I could convince this entire forum, all the ancinet Churches, all the world and even... ZOE!

Oh well, I guess I'll just have to keep my idealized mental constructs for myself (at least, as you noted, it keeps me happy). smile This reminds of a poem:

Roses are red, violets are blue.
I'm a schizophrenic and so am I.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
I'm gonna make this forum a happy place if I have to knock every one of y'all's Eastern and Western heads with a hammer! wink You stultior asinos! (That's way wrong but you know what I'm getting at...) biggrin

May our Holy Father, St. Paul the First Hermit, pray for us unto God!

ChristTeen287

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,698
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,698
Quote
Originally posted by ChristTeen287:
[QUOTE]Personally, I see the Patriarch's refusal as a direct act of the Holy Spirit, just another example of how the Gates of Hell simply cannot prevail against the Church. I think this single act very much set into play the East's position on the Papacy. From this, it seems to me it's undeniable to say that the East didn't heavily effect Vatican I.

And certainly I don't approve of the Holy Father humiliating this outright act of the Holy Spirit.
But if a simple Patriarch is going up against an infallible Pope whose official doctrinal proclamations are protected by that same Holy Spirit, then what?

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Quote
But if a simple Patriarch is going up against an infallible Pope whose official doctrinal proclamations are protected by that same Holy Spirit, then what?
Where did this happen in Vatican I?

ChristTeen287

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Dear Ghazar,

I'm sorry to sound pessimistic, Big Guy!

Realism can sometimes be that way, a real bummer!

And that tension between idealists like us smile and church bureaucrats focused on the bottom line will persist.

(And yes, the meeting was THAT bad!)

But I'm upbeat today and ready to take on the world!

Alex

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Dear Qathuliqa Mor Ephrem,

This reminds me of what Bl. Pope John XXIII said:

I am only infallible when I speak 'ex cathedra.' And I will NEVER speak 'ex cathedra!"

Alex

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
I'm a total supporter of the Papal Infallibility...and I LOVE that quote! smile

ChristTeen287

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Dear ChristTeen,

Good Pope John had a reputation as a bit of a jokester in his time.

He refused to eat alone, as was the papal custom, and he was very sociable and outgoing.

So much so, that Italian media began to criticize him for going out and about during the day too much.

The Pope said, "Well, fine! From now on, I'll only go out at night!"

And when he met with an ambassador to the Vatican, he asked how his family was.

"I'm a bachelor, Your Holiness!" came the reply.

"Ah, just like me!" said the Pope . . .

Alex

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Dear Alex:

Since we are on Papal Infallibility again, is it still okay to repeat this old joke?

Oh, it's okay, for ChristTeen's sake!

Blessed Pope John XXIII loved to visit orphanages, hospices, and hospitals in and around Rome unannounced.

One day, he chose Christ Hospital, somewhere in the City, to pay a visit to the patients.

When the Mother Superior realized that His Holiness was already at the entrance to the Hospital, she rushed out and immediately greeted the Holy Father:

"Your Holiness, I am the Superior of Christ!"

"Good for you, Sister! I am only the Vicar of Christ!"

AmdG

Page 8 of 11 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5