Dear John�
Yes.
Union is not to be found in a sameness � nor a sameness of theological expression.
Unity is a change of heart and attitude � and not a change in theological expression of rites and ceremonies nor ecclesiastical structure. Such externals should change with pastoral needs � but not with a sameness across churches goal of an artificial and exterior unity.
Let me repeat something I am found of saying � it is from Plato.
Does the virtuosity of the pianist reside in the quality of his instrument or in the pianist? Will he who is only an average player � play like a virtuoso if given a quality piano? Will the master play as only an average player if forced to play a lesser quality piano?
Just ask anyone who �breaths with two lungs� and they will tell you that the human differences between both East and West - actually make it easier to see the same divine spirit underneath. Those who breathe with �two lungs� eat twice the food than anyone else. And so we are passionate as regards so little difference when each is understood in light of the other.
Breathing with both lungs is an � experience - which can not be easily translated into words. Just ask alice, myself, yourself (your attraction to the East) or anyone who says they breath with both lungs. The Latin who discovers the East is far better off that he is a Latin looking Eastward � and the Eastern member who discovers the West is far better off because of his is Eastern looking West.
Now I can go through the history of the churches East and West � an point out that the West has a magnificent catophatic and mystical tradition (St. John of the Cross, St. Farncis, Padre Pio, Jean Pierre Cassuade, The Little Flower, The Practice of the Presence of God, John Paul, etc.. etc�) if the Catholic care to discover it. And may I remind you that all the Eastern Church has and is � belongs also to the Catholic � it is our history just as much as it is the history of the Eastern church.
Shall I list the number of Catholic theologians such as Von Balthasar, Francis Maloney, Merton, etc� etc.. whose works on understanding our heritage of the East � are books used within Orthodox seminaries. You will not find any Orthodox seminar which does not treat John of the Cross. None.
And that the Eastern churches certainly have a wonderful tradition of brilliant scholastic theology which reached its highest expression within the schools of higher education of the Byzantine Empire � such an expression that it has never dimmed and is still foundational to the Eastern Church even today. Latin scholastics flowered after Eastern scholastics. Latin scholastics flowered because of Eastern scholastics.
It is entirely selective blindness to say that one church is more catophatic than the other or that one church is more scholastic than the other. So let none of us fall for that excuse for division.
The assent to God is a ladder � now on a solid rung and next the need to traverse the empty space between rungs - to the next solid rung. Ladder of Divine Assent. Cloud of Unknowing. John Cassin.
And the person who had one foot in the scholastics of the East (which spoken in the images of cosmogony) and the scholastics of the West (which I remined you began with the Greek terms translated to Latin) � Mister Eckhart � who so well understood both � that he was persecuted by those who only understood one.
Enlightenment of the intellect followed by dark the dark night which is again followed by enlightenment which is followed by darkness � etc.. etc� . Just as John of the Cross and every Eastern father � describe- as the progressive nature of the way to mystical marriage.
And may I ask �Do we not come to know the benefits of the catophatic way by reading about it in scholastic treatises?
Is not Lassky an Eastern socialistic and his book an apophatic treatment regarding the two fold nature of the Eastern church? If Lassky�s book had blank pages � now THAT would be entirely catophatic.
And are not the arguments over theology - the arguments which both side present � are they not apophatic?? Words, semantics, logic?? Yup.
And so above (my arguments) which you can counter and I can re-counter � all week long as others have done for decades � are not the way to union. Sameness.
Rather than plan union � let us � discover � union.
(which I think is a quote from an Orthodox)
See how well I talk myself into this? 
Your own thoughtful essay in your reply � would be welcomed at the type of site I propose. It deals with some aspects that are in someway real and want answer � and at the same time it answers that the differences must be preserved because unity can not be found in the differences (which is where every one wants unity to be found). We do not need nor can we have unity in � sameness.
So let us try another way�
�I give you only one new commandment - Love one another��
which in this case means listen to and understand each other. And let the rest fall where it may.
That is all we should try to do. Our sights should be no higher. Yet � we can be sure that if we do that � higher things are inevitable to take place.
We have no authority nor even capability (we only play with theology at this board) to do anything greater. And thank you God � we have therefore no responsibility to answer for as bishops do!
So it all seems to make senses that we do � what we � can do.
That is � help others to discover the unity which we have found here at the Byzcath board. Take the fruit we have (understanding and appreciating each other) and put that out there for others. We can skip the discussions that we do here � and jump right to the fruit we have produced. And that fruit is specifically how to understand, get along with, etiquette, and appreciate � each others church experience.
I have to laugh (ha!) actually the Byzantine church feels that it is the bottom of the pile. Forgotten and despised by both the Orthodox and Catholic powers. The smallest and more inconsequential church going. Yet � look! Is there any other church in which such unity of all kinds � is at home and flourishes in reality that we all wish we could give to all others??
Let me put on my prophet robes for one minute� has God yet again chosen the smallest and weakest to birth the greatest task of all?? In truth � I wonder.
There
are no �great� men. There are only men whom God has placed at the right place, at the right time, at right crossroads of history and shown them what he was going to do and asked �So � do you want to come along for the ride or shall I select someone else??�
Look around my friend at the time - it is written in the history of the world. Real unity is on the horizon as the world polarizes into shrinking Christian and growing anti-Christian. Christendom is almost finished in the West (the partnership of governments with Christianity). We have got to �circle the sacramental wagons� for what remains � and what remains will be people who have made the conscience choice � to stay with Christ.
A century ago each church was confined within its own geographical area ... now ... especially where churches have grown out of thier once ethinic area - one this street is a Catholic church and down the street is a Greek church and one block over is a Russian church and in the next townis a Coptic church... you can read the signs here right? The traditional geographic walls and ethic isolation - is being removed. The language barrier under which these churches grew - is getting 'gone'.
Gone are the days in which our children went to church because �everybody goes to church�.
Gone is the time in which Christianity was so huge that divisions did not harm it.
We are being forced by God toward a real unity of survival on so many fronts. A unity we did no plan out and which shall not be as we might have planned it.
It is going to happen from the bottom up.
So it seems to me that God is asking us...
�Hey are you 'in' for what I am about to do? or shall I get someone else?�
(Good grief I scare myself.)
And I bet anything John - that you will be one of the most valuable people to keep this whole concept on the right track and not veering off into useless alleys.
I once coined a Chinese proverb when I build a world wide network of 35,000 personal computers through cooperation of 35,000 independent volunteers. When someone came to me and detailed a problem "look - this is a problem etc.. etc.." I often said�
"Chinese proverb: He who sees the problem � is the man closest to the solution. He who recognises the illness is closoest to the cure." and then put that guy in charge of that thing.
That was the best Chinese proverb I ever made up out of my own head.

it put that network together better than I myself could have done it.
-ray
-ray