The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Regf2, SomeInquirer, Wee Shuggie, Bodhi Zaffa, anaxios2022
5,881 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
2 members (Fr. Al, theophan), 133 guests, and 19 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,296
Members5,881
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#113875 10/06/00 12:34 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
I am reading "The Message of the Bible, An Orthodox Christian Perspective" by George Cronk for an Intro to Scripture class. On page 37 of the book the author states that it is an Orthodox tradition to teach that the incarnation (without the death of Christ)would of taken place even if man did not fall from grace. Could someone give me some more backround on this. I have never run across this before in Orthodox teaching.

#113876 10/06/00 02:40 AM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Dear Byz-Lady,
Since this board is called East-N-West, i can perhaps add a little info you may appreciate. This is a very old theological question. In the Latin church there are two differing schools of thought.

The Franciscan school says Yes, God would have become incarnate even if Adam had never fallen.

The Dominican or Thomistic school says No, God would not have become incarnate if Adam did not fall. St. Thomas Aquinas gives two reasons for this belief.
First, according to St. Thomas scripture does not support this theory. Secondly, again according to St. Thomas, the Fathers of the Church do not support this theory.

So in the West there is a split of opinion. I would be very curious to know what the Byzantine and non-Byzantine East says about this topic, and wheather in the East there is room for differing schools of thought. Could you perhaps elaborate on the reasons Mr. Cronk gives for his stated position.

#113877 10/06/00 10:33 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
Khaled,
Mr Cronk states in his book, "But man, as we have seen, although created good, was a finite, imcomplete and therefore imperfect being, even in the garden of Eden. And for this reason, many Orthdox thinkers have argured that man's movement toward union with God would have required God's movement toward union with man, even if man had remained faithful to his Creator and therefore free from sin. Only if God condescended to become one with man could man realistically hope to become one with God. Thus, the incarnation of the divine Word-the union of God and man in the person of Jesus Christ-is an essential feature of God's eternal plan for the world. And the incarnation would have taken place even if man had not fallen under the bondage of sin and death".


Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5