|
|
|
0 members (),
327
guests, and
24
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134 |
Originally posted by DavidB, the Byzantine Catholic:
sedevacantist
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can someone tell me how this word is pronounced?
Thanks!
Dave It's pronounced "skiz . . . mat . . . ick"! 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010 |
So would the accent be on the third syllable: sedevacantist?
Or on another syllable?
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,196
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,196 |
I've always heard it on the next one - sedeveCANtist.
Cheers,
Sharon
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,252
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,252 |
Dear Friends,
I spell it H-E-R-E-S-Y.
Pray for these lost brothers and sisters.
We need them in the true church of Jesus Christ.
Mother of God, pray for us!
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 |
Since the root is sede vacante ("the seat is empty") which has been squeezed into one word, I think as well that the stress is penultimate as Sharon has indicated. To most sedevacantists there has not been a valid Pope since Pius XII.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,010 |
Thank you, Sharon and Diak! This was a word I have only read in print and never heard spoken. At least now I can use it without sounding silly! Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 219
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 219 |
I have been asked to clarify my position regarding the hierarch of the Church. It is my position that for the most part Pope John Paul II has not been a good Pope for the faithful and most of the Bishops he has pointed have not been good for the Church. Plain and simple this is my position. It is a very Catholic position and a theologically correct position. We as the laity have every justifiable right to disagree with the hierarchs. For many Catholics there is a blind allegiance to the Pope and to the other extreme we have schismatics. I though loyal to the Church disagree with the many of the hierarchs. Just like the many horrible periods in the past the Church has had to face (i.e. Iconoclast) I believe we are facing another period perhaps labeled Modernist period. Here is a good example of a bad Bishop: http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/1634.html I do not feel it necessary to defend my position because my many post in the past begin to present a reasonable but limited defense to my argument. I am simply stating my position for clarification purposes only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
