The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Regf2, SomeInquirer, Wee Shuggie, Bodhi Zaffa, anaxios2022
5,881 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
5 members (Fr. Al, theophan, 3 invisible), 107 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#160931 09/07/05 03:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
A
Amadeus Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
A
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Rev. Jackson (originally of Chicago) while bemoaning the slow, or lack of, Federal response to the Katrina natural disaster during his visit of the areas affected, labelled as "racist" the media and all others who are bent on using the term "refugees" for the people displaced from the gulf States, underscoring that majority of those "refugees" are black.

Normally, any person without a visible agenda would or should understand that a "refugee" as one who flees to seek protection or shelter from danger or hardship, or to find a haven or sanctuary, or to ask another person or entity for help, relief, or escape, regardless of race or color!

Perhaps the term has acquired a "political" undertone and "refugee" has now evolved to mean solely, or most of the time, a person fleeing from "oppression" or "persecution."

Some media outlets have "heeded" Jackson's admonition and have switched to calling the Katrina "refugees" as "evacuees," which is also a term applicable to the situation. Others don't give a damn about the nuances Rev. Jackson wanted observed and continue to use "refugees" or to interchange it with "evacuees." wink

American politics at its shining moment!

Amado

#160932 09/07/05 03:33 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Amado,

Unfortunately, this is not America itself at its shining moment!

Alex

#160933 09/07/05 04:10 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 335
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 335
For the record, this is a debate that's going on in newsrooms all around the country.

Here's one article on the issue:

http://www.maynardije.org/columns/dickprince/050905_prince/

At the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, where I'm a columnist, Webster's New World Dictionary, the dictionary that my newspaper cites on matters of style, describes a refugee as one "who flees from home or country to seek refuge elsewhere, as in a time of war or of political or religious persecution."

Generally, it's not used in the context of natural disasters, and in international conventions it specifically means an individual crossing an international border to escape violence or persecution.

--tim

#160934 09/07/05 04:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Tim,

They say that this is the highest displacement of Americans since the Civil War.

If a Southerner, during that terrible war, crossed over to the North to escape - would that person have been described as a refugee?

Alex

#160935 09/07/05 05:05 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 335
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 335
Sorry, sir, I don't have any insights into the mid-19th Century usage of the word.

--tim

#160936 09/07/05 05:22 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Tim,

That's O.K., sir! smile

Are you busy doing articles on Hurricane Katrina too?

Alex

#160937 09/07/05 05:35 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 335
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 335
Since you asked, I have been writing about the media coverage of the storm, including this column today:
http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/sep05/353712.asp

Of course, I'm also writing about things like the death of Bob Denver:
http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/sep05/353715.asp

--tim

#160938 09/07/05 05:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
A
Amadeus Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
A
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Dear Alex:

You asked Tim:

Quote
If a Southerner, during that terrible war, crossed over to the North to escape - would that person have been described as a refugee?
Probably a person seeking political "asylum" or be called "traitor!" wink

If that person went further North and crossed the border, he could have been called a "double traitor!" biggrin

amado

#160939 09/07/05 06:48 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Amado,

Well, I won't say "wrong again" because I don't keep a record of your past wrongs . . . wink

But Jefferson Davis (buried in New Orleans, hope he's still there) once came to Canada, which is also a "Confederacy" and said, "I feel more at home here than across the border . . ."

Of course, all our apple trees are sweet and not sour, so we would have none on which to hang him in the first place ("We're gonna hang Jeff Davis on a sour apple-tree. . .") wink

Alex

#160940 09/07/05 06:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Tim,

Excellent, sir!

New Orleans could have used Gilligan's skill in getting out of that storm in one piece!

Alex

#160941 09/07/05 06:54 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 335
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 335
Jefferson Davis is buried in Richmond, VA., so he continues to rest peacefully.

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761579207/Jefferson_Davis.html

--tim

#160942 09/07/05 07:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
A
Amadeus Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
A
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Dear Alex:

Ooops, there goes another one! :p

However, this is forgivable because you might be essentially right. wink

Jefferson Davis did die in New Orleans as confirmed by the linked article provided by Tim and he was buried there temporarily and then his remains translated to the capital of the Confederacy, Richmond, Virginia.

Here's an excerpt describing the event:

Quote
. . . The burial place in New Orleans was selected only as a temporary receptacle, while a general movement was inaugurated for a tomb and monument which resulted in the removal of the body to Richmond, the capitol of the Confederacy. The removal took place by means of a special funeral train from New Orleans to Richmond, passing through several States and stopping at many places to receive the respectful and affectionate tributes bestowed by the people. The scene from the time of the departure from New Orleans to the last rites at Richmond was singular in its nature and sublime in its significance of popular esteem for the memory of the Confederate President. The funeral train moved day and night almost literally in review before the line of people assembled to see it pass. Finally in the presence of many thousands the casket was deposited in the last resting place in the keeping of the city which had so long withstood the rude alarms of war under his presidency.
Source: http://www.civilwarhome.com/jdavisbio.htm

Actually, he is buried at the Hollywood Cemetery in Richmond, Virginia.

Amado

#160943 09/08/05 12:03 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 148
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 148
People displaced from their Southern homes during the CW are properly referred to as refugees(ask me how I know! smile
Michele

#160944 09/08/05 02:37 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
I'm almost totally certain that the term "refugee" is incorrect to describe the people of the Gulf Coast and New Orleans because of the following reason.

"Refugee" only technically refers to one who has had to cross an national border in order to evacuate. Those who do not have to cross such a border are called "displaced persons."

Logos Teen

#160945 09/08/05 04:06 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 335
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 335
Actually, as anybody with connections to the post-World War II era will know, "displaced persons" were the refugees who were in "DP" camps located throughout Europe after the war.

In my old Chicago neighborhood, circa 1960s and 1970s, DP was a slur directed at anybody who sounded (or, more importantly) dressed like a refugee from the Old Country.

Although not for that reason, it's an awkward term that doesn't really work for the evacuees from New Orleans, who are, quite simply, evacuees.

Here's a good sampling of definitions of "displaced persons":

http://www.answers.com/topic/displaced-person


--tim

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5