|
1 members (1 invisible),
264
guests, and
21
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,295
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,698
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,698 |
Originally posted by Tony: When I was in elementary school we learned "James' dog" was correct and "James's dog" incorrect. The rule was basically there would never be -s's. Apparently that has changed, I like the old way. The Sisters taught me that both ways were correct. So one could say "Charles' book" or "Charles's book". It wasn't specific to Jesus and Moses.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941 |
When I was in elementary school we learned "James' dog" was correct and "James's dog" incorrect. The rule was basically there would never be -s's. Apparently that has changed, I like the old way. Tony: Unless you are some hundred years old, "James's dog" was recommended usage before your elementary education. Forming possesives of singular nouns with "'s" is the first rule in Strunk's "The Elements of Style" (1918) http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk.html#1
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 976
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 976 |
Originally posted by djs: When I was in elementary school we learned "James' dog" was correct and "James's dog" incorrect. The rule was basically there would never be -s's. Apparently that has changed, I like the old way. Tony: Unless you are some hundred years old, "James's dog" was recommended usage before your elementary education. Forming possesives of singular nouns with "'s" is the first rule in Strunk's "The Elements of Style" (1918) http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk.html#1 I am not 100 years old but that is certainly what I remember, memory of course being a funny thing. Maybe the teachers were 100 years old though. If you run a search on "English grammar" in google (or another I am sure) you will come up with many links, I did. If you go through (or should I write thru?) one or more you will likely find what I did. It says both usages are acceptable today.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21 |
Dear Tony, Are you this sharp in your classes at St Vladimir's? Are you preparing to be a Professor, by the way? alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 976
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 976 |
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic: Dear Tony,
Are you this sharp in your classes at St Vladimir's?
Are you preparing to be a Professor, by the way?
alexAlex, I don't think of myself as sharp so no. And no. Tony
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315 Likes: 21 |
Dear Tony,
Well, you are sharp, Big Guy, and you'd make a great Professor!
Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 220
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 220 |
Except for the grammar lesson or lessons, this is a most interesting thread. But I wonder: WWJD? What would Jesus do? (about all these Churches). What would Jesus say about all these Churches? Maybe, He'd say something like, "I told you to pray for unity?" Well, what do YOU think He'd say? (At least this should get us off the grammar track!) :rolleyes: :p
|
|
|
|
|