|
0 members (),
327
guests, and
24
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,708
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,708 |
Yes, lots of bull - as usual. :p 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,881
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,881 |
Well the only Bull that counts is Papal Bull I did see a photo of Pope Paul with the Papal dairy herd. Naturally the 'ladies' were Swiss. ICXC NIKA
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440 |
Thank you Alex! My, my these people, sanctity can be in front of their eyes, and they refuse to recognize it. Why a perfect proof is your Akithist to him. Could you have written it without the Holy Spirit. I say not!
First of all, some are saying that they are looking at legacy? How do they know what the legacy would have been without him. Only God knows! If we took into account the direction the Church was heading, it might have gone the way of the Episcopalians.
Then they say he was a terrible administrator. Well tell me, how could he have administrated in his condition, and especially when he was either in prayer or sitting outside in that hot sun in some place or other in the world?
As for the Muslims, by asking God to protect Islam through John the Baptist, (who's head is in a mosque), he was indirectly asking God to make them accept His Son Jesus as their Saviour. How else could God protect them? Certainly not as followers of Mohammed and his heresies?
That's my two cents worth!
Zenovia
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 448
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 448 |
"As for Saintly Popes who have been bad Popes, there was a Pope from the ( I wanna say 1300ish) whom was horrible at being Pope, he was a monastic whom was elected to the Papacy because of his great holiness and proved to be a horrible administrator and was so disastorous he choose to resign back to his monastary rather than ruin the Church further. He was latter cannonized , I forgot his name though. "
yes, Pope Celestine V, or St. Peter Celestine. They say he was poisoned by his successor.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza Member
|
Catholic Gyoza Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518 |
Originally posted by Apotheoun: That being said, I believe that the push for "fast track" canonizations -- so popular today -- are shortsighted, and actually show a type of spiritual immaturity within the Church. Time is a good thing, and given the right amount of time and discernment, perhaps the Church will come to the conclusion that John Paul is a saint, but there is no need to rush to judgment. As much as I respect your postings and opinions I have to disagree. Sts. Francis and Clare of Assisi, Anthony of Padua, and Thomas Beckett were all "fast tracked" to name a few!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838 Likes: 2 |
You have a right to your opinion, but I stand by my comments.
The Church -- in our fast food, I want it now era -- seems to be falling into the same speed everything up view of life that is prevalent in modern pop culture. I've actually gone to Masses at Latin Churches where the pastor appeared pleased by the fact that he can say Mass in 45 minutes on a Sunday.
Honestly speaking, Pope John Paul II is not going anywhere, because he is now resting in peace, so there is no need to rush to judgment in his cause for canonization.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza Member
|
Catholic Gyoza Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518 |
I'm just saying that "fast tracking" is not unprecedented. It's been around for centuries.
Whether or not his Canonization comes 2 years or 2 decades from now it won't stop those who already are praying to him.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21 |
Dear Friends,
Yes, sometimes canonizations were by popular acclamation . . . on the day of the funeral of a saint!
"Canonization" is simply the public recognition of what God, not anyone else, has already done in Heaven.
And in the case of the RC canonization process, it is often a costly one that some say is in bad need of serious reform.
There is no reason why John Paul could not be beatified for public liturgical veneration.
In fact, on Mt Athos, every monk's body is exhumed after three years of being in the ground under a thin layer of earth.
The body is then examined for incorruptibility of relics etc.
If incorruptibility is evident, the body is laid out for others to pray before and ask for his intercession. When miracles occur, as they often do in such cases, then the reposed monk is glorified locally in his own monastery.
If that's not "fast-tracking," I don't know what is!
Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838 Likes: 2 |
Originally posted by Dr. Eric: I'm just saying that "fast tracking" is not unprecedented. It's been around for centuries.
Whether or not his Canonization comes 2 years or 2 decades from now it won't stop those who already are praying to him. Of course, because people can pray privately to anyone they want to. Personally, I'd much rather see Pius XII canonized.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678 |
Apotheoun,
Pope Pius XII is already a beatus, isn't he?
Even if he is not, I think that his process was slowed by those who wrongly accused him of not acting in the face of the Nazi regime. It seems his cause is gaining ground the more that people, both Jews and non-Jews learn about how much Pius XII helped the Jews and did all he could in the circumstances. In fact, lots of times it's Jewish authors who defend him!
Presently, is the only saint-pope of the 20th century Pope Saint Pius X?
Since John XXIII is a beatus, he doesn't qualify (yet, anyway). Benedict, the two Piuses (Pii?), Paul, John, and the two John Pauls - none of these are saints as far as I know. Am I forgetting a 20th century pope?
Logos Teen
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,225 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,225 Likes: 1 |
This weekend I'll be taping all the many programs on blessed Pope John Paul II...
A nice film about PJPII & Jerzy Kluger on EWTN yesterday...it brought tears...again
james
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838 Likes: 2 |
Originally posted by Teen Of The Incarnate Logos: Apotheoun,
Pope Pius XII is already a beatus, isn't he? No, I do not believe that he has been beatified.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838 Likes: 2 |
Originally posted by Teen Of The Incarnate Logos: [. . .]
Presently, is the only saint-pope of the 20th century Pope Saint Pius X?
Since John XXIII is a beatus, he doesn't qualify (yet, anyway). Benedict, the two Piuses (Pii?), Paul, John, and the two John Pauls - none of these are saints as far as I know. Am I forgetting a 20th century pope?
Logos Teen Yes, St. Pius X is presently the only pope of the 20th century who has been canonized. 20th century popes: Leo XIII (1878 - 1903) St. Pius X (1903 - 1914) Benedict XV (1914 - 1922) Pius XI (1922 - 1939) Pius XII (1939 - 1958) Blessed John XXIII (1958 - 1963) Paul VI (1963 - 1978) John Paul I (1978) John Paul II (1978 - 2005)
|
|
|
|
|