The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Regf2, SomeInquirer, Wee Shuggie, Bodhi Zaffa, anaxios2022
5,881 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
2 members (Fr. Al, theophan), 133 guests, and 19 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,296
Members5,881
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Dear Anastasios,

But why are you against the union of ROCOR with the MP?

What does time have to do with it?

Alex

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
D
djs Offline
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
Quote
Personally, if pressed to answer if Catholic priests are "really" priests, I would simply answer that I do not know; God knows. When received into the Orthodox Church, whether or not re-ordained, they definitely are. This satisfies me and is quite consistent with ancient ecclesiology. Interestingly, much the same concept has been developed in quantum physics with uncertainty, e.g., Schoedinger's cat.
Actually the uncertainty concept that you discuss about priests "really" being priests is utterly disimilar to quantum indeterminacy.

In the latter case, the fact that the outcome after "conversion" (measurement) could be predicted with certainty suffices to show that their status was not indeterminate - that they were priests. I think this is not what you want to say.

If that state had actually been indeterminiate, then some after conversion some would be found not to be priests and others would be found to be priests - with no way of telling, a priori, who would be who.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,075
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,075
Quote
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic:
Dear Anastasios,

But why are you against the union of ROCOR with the MP?

What does time have to do with it?

Alex
Alex,

Simply because as much as I would like union between the two bodies, I do not believe that the MP has responded appopriately yet by rejecting ecumenism. I give Pat Alexy credit for apologizing for his past and I am not one to judge the MP under communism so you won't see me making a fuss about "Sergianism." If the MP really did renounce ecumenism, then I would think the time is right.

Time figures into the equation in that while I think union is a good idea, it is not a good idea yet until the MP renounces ecumenism. I think if ROCOR were a little more patient they might achieve that goal; instead it seems to me they are caving in.

Just my opinion.

Anastasios

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Z
Member
Offline
Member
Z
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Dear Anastasios you said:

"Time figures into the equation in that while I think union is a good idea, it is not a good idea yet until the MP renounces ecumenism. I think if ROCOR were a little more patient they might achieve that goal; instead it seems to me they are caving in."

I say: Caving in to what? In doing what our Lord wants of His Church?

Zenovia

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 937
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 937
I personally feel this is another miracle of the Holy Spirit happening in our lifetime. Our God is the Living God! The slow but steady progress demonstrated between ROCOR and ROC are a lesson to learn from and a model in diplomacy. At one point, I believe from reading on the internet, it appeared such a feat could never happen, due to so many fundamental core differences reflected by the posters, and yet, here it comes to fruition. We should embrace this change, learn from it, and see if we can apply it towards hopefully sharing the same Cup.

Alleluia! Slava Isusu Christu! Amen!

The mysteries of the Lord are awesome.

Michael

In Christ, Michael

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,075
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,075
Quote
Originally posted by Zenovia:
Dear Anastasios you said:

"Time figures into the equation in that while I think union is a good idea, it is not a good idea yet until the MP renounces ecumenism. I think if ROCOR were a little more patient they might achieve that goal; instead it seems to me they are caving in."

I say: Caving in to what? In doing what our Lord wants of His Church?

Zenovia
Ecumenism is not what the Lord wants; hence, by the ROCOR standing courageously against ecumenism all these years and then rushing in to union without solving the issue of ecumenism, that would be a cave-in and contrary to the will of God, which is that we worship him in the spirit of truth.

Anastasios

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
I
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
Dear Photius,

Bewailing my ignorance of quantum physics (or any other kind of physics), I am nevertheless fascinated - could you, of your kindness, tell me what Schoedinger's cat is? Thanks in advance!

Incognitus

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,315
Likes: 21
Dear Anastasios,

Well, I can appreciate your concerns about ecumenism.

However, if anyone, the Orthodox who do participate in it do so with the greatest sense of reality and sobriety - including your own St Vladimir's Seminary and the OCA.

I doubt very much if ROCOR attitudes about ecumenism will change after reconciliation with their Mother Patriarchate.

Ultimately, I think we tend to see things as North Americans - in theological terms only.

ROCOR is, first and foremost, a RUSSIAN Orthodox jurisdiction, from "Holy Orthodox Russia" and its Tsarist version especially.

What draws them and the Moscow Patriarchate towards each other is not theology or ecclesial policies that distinguish them.

It is the sense of closeness they feel because of a common religious/national/cultural identity and shared heritage.

ROCOR is, in its own way, "ecumenical" too. It is a pioneer in openness to the Old Believers and other Orthodox that share their deeply traditional "heart-rending" Slavic Orthodoxy (such as the Serbians).

In the years before the Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church became reestablished, we counted a number of very important friends in the person of ROCOR-ites.

I know Ukrainian Catholic monastics who have joined ROCOR - that would have been impossible if ROCOR wasn't open to sharing their religious experience with others, which is what true ecumenism is all about.

And I think ROCOR has more to offer the MP than the other way around - an enriching experience for all.

The momentum for this reconciliation is too strong for it to be stopped.

And we North Americans who often strive to be as Orthodox as ROCOR sometimes misunderstand the important Slavic, Russian component of their Orthodoxy.

Congratulations on your graduation though!

Alex

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Both the Serbian and Jerusalem Patriarchates participate in Ecumenical organizations. The idea that ROCOR would hold off rejoining the MP on this point makes no sense to me as it is already in communion with those churches.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Father Anthony 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5