|
2 members (2 invisible),
307
guests, and
28
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,295
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390 |
Cardinal Bertone: We Don't Proselytize Comments in Wake of Reported Statements by Alexy II
ROME, DEC. 5, 2006 (Zenit.org).- The Catholic Church has good relations with the Russian Orthodox Church and is not trying to engage in proselytism, says the Vatican secretary of state, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone.
The cardinal made this observation today when journalists asked him, at the Pontifical Urbanian University, to comment on Orthodox Patriarch Alexy II's appeal to the Vatican to stop its "unfriendly" actions toward the canonical Church in Russia, Ukraine and other Commonwealth of Independent States.
"I do not know Patriarch Alexy's statement, but I believe that relations between Moscow's patriarchate and the Holy See are sufficiently good and talks are taking place, with frequent visits," said the cardinal.
"Moreover, we do not want to engage in proselytism in Russia," he added.
According to Interfax, Patriarch Alexy II of Moscow told his clergy at the Christ the Savior Cathedral today: "The Catholic mission continues among people [who are] baptized Orthodox Christians in Russia and other CIS member-nations. So does the exceedingly unfriendly policy by the administration of the Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church toward the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church."
The Orthodox patriarch said he hopes that the Vatican will take concrete steps to improve the situation.
"Without it," Alexy II said, "our meetings with representatives of the Roman Catholic Church will be just formal events, which will not help relieve the pain of people who suffer from non-fraternal actions." ZE06120504
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,658 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,658 Likes: 3 |
Every time the MP brings up Ukraine, the Latin Church should bring up France and the Western Rite Orthodox - I wonder how the Patriarchate would answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,177
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,177 |
In the eyes of Moscow, every non-Catholic (well, at least Slavic) born on the territory of the former USSR is considered a "baptized Orthodox Christians". If they haven't been baptised Orthodox, they should have been. Honestly, how many people in Soviet Russia were baptised? To put it simply, Moscow does not want Catholics potentially 'stealing' people who Moscow thinks should be Orthodox. On the other hand, where are the protests about all of the foreign Protestant groups making inroads in the former USSR? Going by past performance, either Patriarch Alexii or Metropolitan Volodymyr will soon be welcoming some Protestant delegation, exchanging gifts, taking some nice pictures. It's happened before - complain about the Catholics, then play hosts to Protestants. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411 |
Every time the MP brings up Ukraine, the Latin Church should bring up France and the Western Rite Orthodox - I wonder how the Patriarchate would answer. That this group isn't under their jurisdiction and they aren't financially supporting them. I would imagine those would be the first words out of their mouth. Here's the story from Interfax. http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=2339Seems like interesting timing.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437
Administrator Member
|
Administrator Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437 |
Every time the MP brings up Ukraine, the Latin Church should bring up France and the Western Rite Orthodox - I wonder how the Patriarchate would answer. That this group isn't under their jurisdiction and they aren't financially supporting them. I would imagine those would be the first words out of their mouth. Here's the story from Interfax. http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=2339Seems like interesting timing. I would also like to add this point in the way you (Michael Thoma) would like to misrepresent something such as the western rite in France. I would strongly suggest you arm yourself with history and fact. The group that entered as western rite and eventually became known as l'ECOF came into communion from the Liberal Catholic Church, not the Roman Catholic Church. The bulk of their earlier adherents came from the Russian emigration not through proselytization, and the unfortunate fact that their efforts to remain under one patriarchate or another has not been successful. As Ilian has pointed out, the efforts of l'ECOF have never been organized into any proselytizing effort, and I do not believe their adherents ever exceeded 10,000 faithful ever in their history. I find it shameful that you bring this example up by your gross misrepresentation and implying that this is a movement on par with what has happened elsewhere. Though I do not condone the Patriarch's sentiments in the least, I find cheap shots as you posted to be deplorable and disgusting. But, then again that seems to be your pattern and posting style as of late. I would strongly suggest you think, check more than one resource (which is quite evident that you didn't) and start posting something factual and not a gross exaggeration before you post again. In IC XC, Father Anthony+
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411 |
In the United States, the WR like the Byzantine tradition churches, are really targetting and receiving Protestants and Anglicans. Almost all of the Catholics I know who are now Orthodox came in through marriage, though I know some individuals who converted and obviously some on this board fall in to that category. I know of no organized efforts whatsoever to convince or attempt to convert Catholics; and I know of no financial resources whatsoever earmarked for that purpose. Usually the complaint with Orthodoxy is we're too lax in efforts to evangelize (just in general, nothing to do with Catholicism).
Last edited by Ilian; 12/06/06 01:44 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,658 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,658 Likes: 3 |
Every time the MP brings up Ukraine, the Latin Church should bring up France and the Western Rite Orthodox - I wonder how the Patriarchate would answer. That this group isn't under their jurisdiction and they aren't financially supporting them. I would imagine those would be the first words out of their mouth. Here's the story from Interfax. http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=2339Seems like interesting timing. I would also like to add this point in the way you (Michael Thoma) would like to misrepresent something such as the western rite in France. I would strongly suggest you arm yourself with history and fact. The group that entered as western rite and eventually became known as l'ECOF came into communion from the Liberal Catholic Church, not the Roman Catholic Church. The bulk of their earlier adherents came from the Russian emigration not through proselytization, and the unfortunate fact that their efforts to remain under one patriarchate or another has not been successful. As Ilian has pointed out, the efforts of l'ECOF have never been organized into any proselytizing effort, and I do not believe their adherents ever exceeded 10,000 faithful ever in their history. I find it shameful that you bring this example up by your gross misrepresentation and implying that this is a movement on par with what has happened elsewhere. Though I do not condone the Patriarch's sentiments in the least, I find cheap shots as you posted to be deplorable and disgusting. But, then again that seems to be your pattern and posting style as of late. I would strongly suggest you think, check more than one resource (which is quite evident that you didn't) and start posting something factual and not a gross exaggeration before you post again. In IC XC, Father Anthony+ Fr. Anthony, Barekmor. I was not referring to the jurisdictions which you mentioned Father. I also refrained from mentioning the Western Rite Churches under the Antiochian Church, since those are not dependent on Moscow. I also did not mention the Western Rites under the Syriac Orthodox Patriarchate. I was, however, referring to the Western Rite Churches under ROCOR in France, England, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, the United States, etc. I don't understand why my post is being taken as a "cheap shot" - Moscow has stated that the "uniates" have no right to exist, I am genuinely interested to hear if the Patriarchate think the WR Orthodox also have "no right to exist". Moscow has also stated that the Catholic Church is proselytizing Orthodox in Ukraine, are the non-MP Churches considered Orthodox by Moscow?; shouldn't Anglicans be viewed similarly in relation to the Latin Catholics, if not why? I also do not feel I have ever written a cheap shot post - at least not intentionally. I have decided to take a long break from this site, I no longer feel welcome. I have been labeled a hypocrite as well as a chronic cheap shotter from those I consider allies in faith ...if I am so, I ask forgiveness. Goodbye and God Bless.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437
Administrator Member
|
Administrator Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437 |
Michael Thoma,
I am sorry, but your reference was quite clear, and that was France, and the encyclical you referred to or at least eluded regards l'ECOF. As far as the Western rite existing, I have made it clear in previous posts, it is a very contentious subject even among the various Orthodox jurisdictions. I personally do not favor a "reverse Unia" but I am a priest and I can not question what a Patriarchate has chosen to follow in their activities. As I previously stated, I do not condone the sentiments of the Patriarchate of Moscow in this area.
One thing you will find out about me in regards to what can be a volatile situation, is that I am a stickler for historical and factual accuracy. I too am sorry for any offense, but in sensitive matters such as this, clarity instead of vagueness is essential to prevent any misunderstandings such as may have occurred. you have to remember that there are several on this board that have the credentials to teach Church History in this regard on the Forum.
In IC XC, Father Anthony+
Everyone baptized into Christ should pass progressively through all the stages of Christ's own life, for in baptism he receives the power so to progress, and through the commandments he can discover and learn how to accomplish such progression. - Saint Gregory of Sinai
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264 |
Cardinal Bertone: We Don't Proselytize Comments in Wake of Reported Statements by Alexy II
According to Interfax, Patriarch Alexy II of Moscow told his clergy at the Christ the Savior Cathedral today: "The Catholic mission continues among people [who are] baptized Orthodox Christians in Russia and other CIS member-nations. So does the exceedingly unfriendly policy by the administration of the Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church toward the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church." I wonder if it would be helpful to define what the Patriarch means by "prosyletism". Does he regard the very existence of the UGCC as prosyletism? How about the legitimate return of Greek-Catholic parishes (people and properties) to their original jurisdiction after the forced conversions under Stalin...does he regard that as prosyletism? Or any type of mission work engaged in by the UGCC within (or outside) their jurisdictional territory? I fundamentally disagree with prosyletism as "sheep stealing" on either the Catholic or the Orthodox side. With that said, I cannot help but wonder if Patriarch Alexi is calling "foul" what is a legitimate activity of an apostolic body? No specifics are provided...does anyone know? God bless, Gordo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,177
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,177 |
The Russian Orthodox Church with the help of the Soviet government liquidated the Ukrainian Greco-Catholic Church. Moscow then scattered people from Western Ukraine across Eastern Ukraine and other parts of the Soviet Union. Now the ROC is upset by the presence of "uniates" in "traditionally Orthodox territories".
As you sow, so shall you reap...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735 |
The Russian Orthodox Church with the help of the Soviet government liquidated the Ukrainian Greco-Catholic Church. Moscow then scattered people from Western Ukraine across Eastern Ukraine and other parts of the Soviet Union. Now the ROC is upset by the presence of "uniates" in "traditionally Orthodox territories".
As you sow, so shall you reap... The Catholic Church with the help of the Polish King liquidated the Orthodox Church, then drove the remaining Orthodox into the Cossack Sech and other parts of Russia. Now The Catholic Church is upset that the ROC is taking back what was stolen from them. As you sow, so shall you reap.... Alexandr
Last edited by Slavipodvizhnik; 12/07/06 06:49 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 501
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 501 |
Bravo Alexandr! Well said.
To Pan Kobzar, please lets stop fighting these old battles; it doesn't help the situation.
To everyone on this Forum, rememeber we can't trust everything published or put on the web by INTERFAX.
We must be seekers of the Truth. However, in the present situation, I will admit this is an almost impossible task. But for Christians we must continue the Good Fight.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264 |
So all we have done is to prove that wrongdoing has been committed on both sides...anyone surprised by that?
It still does not explain how Patriarch Alexi defines prosyletism, despite the fact that it seems he drops the charge in the media on a regular basis. Does he have a legitimate charge to make or is he just trying to ensure that dialogue will go nowhere without the termination of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church?...or is there another alternative view?
Gordo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411 |
From the Miles Jesu web site http://www.milesjesu.com/about/about-biritual.htmlThis is the second part of the talk. Here Father General takes up the topic of the Orthodox churches, which are not in union with Rome. Please note that the terms �Eastern� and �Byzantine� refer to Roman Catholics of the Eastern Rites and are used interchangeably.
Some people still have some misgivings. They try to convert the Byzantine Catholics to the Latin Mass. That is wrong. They don�t need to be converted because they are Catholic, whether Byzantine or Latin. The Holy Father is continually telling us to explain these two Liturgies and their history.
This is why during every Path to Rome convention we have a celebration of the Byzantine Liturgy.
The Holy Father is crying and praying that one day there will be unity between the Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches, whether they are of the Latin rite or the Byzantine rite.
In Ukraine alone, about a thousand priests and five bishops have joined the Catholic Church from the Orthodox. I visited the Byzantine Rite Catholic bishop of the capital of Ukraine about two years ago and he told me that he had 40 Orthodox priests that were applying to become Catholics.
But don�t think the Catholic Church accepts people easily. No, the Church has conditions. The Church knows that some of those bishops in the Orthodox church are not true bishops because they were not validly consecrated. In most cases, the priests who become Catholics are actually ordained again, conditionally. Sure sounds like proselytism to me, and these people are official, unlike the SSPX.
Last edited by Ilian; 12/07/06 07:49 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264 |
Ahh...shall we discuss Catholic clergy going Orthodox? Is that prosyletism or does it only go one way?
If a priest desires to transfer to another jurisdiction (read "convert") it is a matter of conscience. There is nothing to the best of my knowledge which compells him beyond what he believes God is leading him to do.
And who is to say that the examples he cites are not merely those of clergy from those parishes and communities that were forced into Orthodoxy by the Soviet regime? We don't know the specifics, so I disagree that this indicates prosyletism, although I will agree that the mindset of the author is somewhat triumphalistic.
Gordo
|
|
|
|
|