|
3 members (Fr. Al, 2 invisible),
103
guests, and
15
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264 |
gotta love the looney academic left... http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-op-allen7jan07,0,2268882.story?page=2&track=mostemailedlink Since the 1960s, the Young America's Foundation has decried what it considers leftist radicalism on college campuses. Last month, it released this academic year's "Dirty Dozen" � college courses it found to be "the most bizarre and troubling instances of leftist activism supplanting traditional scholarship."
1. "The Phallus"
Occidental College. A seminar in critical theory and social justice, this class examines Sigmund Freud, phallologocentrism and the lesbian phallus.
2. "Queer Musicology"
UCLA. This course welcomes students from all disciplines to study what it calls an "unruly discourse" on the subject, understood through the works of Cole Porter, Pussy Tourette and John Cage.
3. "Taking Marx Seriously"
Amherst College. This advanced seminar for 15 students examines whether Karl Marx still matters despite the countless interpretations and applications of his ideas, or whether the world has entered a post-Marxist era.
4. "Adultery Novel"
University of Pennsylvania. Falling in the newly named "gender, culture and society" major, this course examines novels and films of adultery such as "Madame Bovary" and "The Graduate" through Marxist, Freudian and feminist lenses.
5. "Blackness"
Occidental College. Critical race theory and the idea of "post-blackness" are among the topics covered in this seminar course examining racial identity. A course on whiteness is a prerequisite.
6. "Border Crossings, Borderlands: Transnational Feminist Perspectives on Immigration"
University of Washington. This women studies department offering takes a new look at recent immigration debates in the U.S., integrating questions of race and gender while also looking at the role of the war on terror.
7. "Whiteness: The Other Side of Racism"
Mount Holyoke College. The educational studies department offers this first-year, writing-intensive seminar asking whether whiteness is "an identity, an ideology, a racialized social system," and how it relates to racism.
8. "Native American Feminisms"
University of Michigan. The women's studies and American culture departments offer this course on contemporary Native American feminism, including its development and its relation to struggles for land.
9. "'Mail Order Brides?' Understanding the Philippines in Southeast Asian Context"
Johns Hopkins University. This history course � cross-listed with anthropology, political science and studies of women, gender and sexuality � is limited to 35 students and asks for an anthropology course as a prerequisite.
10. "Cyberfeminism"
Cornell University. Cornell's art history department offers this seminar looking at art produced under the influence of feminism, post-feminism and the Internet.
11. "American Dreams/American Realities"
Duke University. Part of Duke's Hart Leadership Program that prepares students for public service, this history course looks at American myths, from "city on the hill" to "foreign devil," in shaping American history.
12. "Nonviolent Responses to Terrorism"
Swarthmore College. Swarthmore's "peace and conflict studies" program offers this course that "will deconstruct 'terrorism' " and "study the dynamics of cultural marginalization" while seeking alternatives to violence.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,586 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,586 Likes: 1 |
Mind boggling - totally unbelieveable.
Is this really what higher education is about nowadays ??
where's my Choccie
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532 Likes: 1 |
There is a whole class offered by the University of Washington [ seattlepi.nwsource.com] on the lyrics from the rapper Tupac. Image a whole class on Tupac. [ tupacfans.com] And we want to know why corporations want to offshore outsource. Image that?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264 |
No kidding!
It makes "Underwater Basketweaving" look positively enlightened!
What burns me is that many of these places feed at the taxpayer trough.
Ah well...
Gordo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398 |
Well, I suppose I am going to have to defend these institutions. Higher education in the United States is about academic freedom. Some of the courses on this list actually look relevant and interesting to me. Of course, there are some courses offered in the academy that are absurd. But no institution is perfect. And one shouldn't just a whole institution by a mere smattering of courses. In most universities, no student is forced to take any of these courses. As a philosophy professor, I engage in discourse with Marxist thinkers myself. To be honest, I find these kinds of lists, usually written by people who have no idea of what they are talking about, offensive. It reminds me of the Ann Coulter approach to politics: "Smear people and look self-righteous while doing it." Peace in Christ,
Joe
Last edited by JSMelkiteOrthodoxy; 01/11/07 03:42 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,285
AthanasiusTheLesser Member
|
AthanasiusTheLesser Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,285 |
I find it difficult to offer a strong opinion about the worthiness of a course based simply on the title and a brief description. Being able to see this list of readings and the syllabus would be more helpful. Having said that, some of these courses do appear to me to be "looney." OTOH, I do think that some of these courses, particularly those that deal with race, have the potential to be valuable courses, particularly to the extent that they help students understand that race-at least as it is usually understood in the contemporary context, is a man-made construct that has been used to divide people, as well as to justify enslaving Africans and Native Americans. Also, I think that the "American Dreams/American Realities" course offered at Duke University has the potential to be a valuable course, provided that the instructor does not seek to impose an Anti-American bias on the students. Finally, what's wrong with a course that examines "alternatives to violence"? Ryan
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264 |
It reminds me of the Ann Coulter approach to politics: "Smear people and look self-righteous while doing it." Joe, Have you ever even read Ann Coulter? I doubt you could say such a thing if you had... And is higher education REALLY all about academic freedom? And how does one define "academic freedom"? Gordo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532 Likes: 1 |
Ann Coulter is great Catholic! She upholds the faith almost on a daily basis on her radio program. She goes to the Church in NY with EWTN's Father Rutleg (spelling?). She has recommend that Church to people in the NY area on more than one time on her radio program.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398 |
It reminds me of the Ann Coulter approach to politics: "Smear people and look self-righteous while doing it." Joe, Have you ever even read Ann Coulter? I doubt you could say such a thing if you had... And is higher education REALLY all about academic freedom? And how does one define "academic freedom"? Gordo Gordo, I admit that my knowledge of Coulter is superficial, though I've read some articles she has written and I've seen her on t.v. Academic freedom is not the end of higher education, of course. But, it is essential in a democratic society if we are going to preserve free inquiry. My experience has been that foolishness ultimately marginalizes itself. Sure, some of those courses probably involve some content that is just plain silly. But it exposes itself. There are plenty of respected academics writing against some of the nonsense taking place. That is where the debate should happen. The problem with bringing all of this to the electorate is that most people are not sufficiently educated and do not understand everything that is at stake in these debates. They are too easily manipulated by the sophistry of the pundits. I suppose I am old fashioned but I do believe that it is the professors who should determine the direction of higher education and who should be free to dictate the content. The democratisation and commercialization of higher education has done nothing but water it down. Peace in Christ, Joe
Last edited by JSMelkiteOrthodoxy; 01/11/07 04:10 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398 |
Ann Coulter is great Catholic! She upholds the faith almost on a daily basis on her radio program. She goes to the Church in NY with EWTN's Father Rutleg (spelling?). She has recommend that Church to people in the NY area on more than one time on her radio program. Ray, I am glad that she is a faithful, Catholic Christian. My comments have nothing to do with her personal faith. But that she is a faithful Christian, does not mean that I am required to agree with her politics, or her approach to politics, for that matter. Peace in Christ, Joe
Last edited by JSMelkiteOrthodoxy; 01/11/07 04:13 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398 |
I find it difficult to offer a strong opinion about the worthiness of a course based simply on the title and a brief description. Being able to see this list of readings and the syllabus would be more helpful. Having said that, some of these courses do appear to me to be "looney." OTOH, I do think that some of these courses, particularly those that deal with race, have the potential to be valuable courses, particularly to the extent that they help students understand that race-at least as it is usually understood in the contemporary context, is a man-made construct that has been used to divide people, as well as to justify enslaving Africans and Native Americans. Also, I think that the "American Dreams/American Realities" course offered at Duke University has the potential to be a valuable course, provided that the instructor does not seek to impose an Anti-American bias on the students. Finally, what's wrong with a course that examines "alternatives to violence"? Ryan Ryan, Very well said. My thoughts are essentially the same. Also, I would add that one of the purposes of academic discourse is to critique the prevailing rhetoric in society. One thing that bothers me, especially when I watch FOXNews, is that the neo-conservative pundits really are trying to persuade people that if you critize the United States, you must be a traitor and an America-hater. That is what urks me about Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, and these other wanna-be pretty-faced pseudo-intellectuals. It is Mcarthyism all over again. Peace in Christ, Joe
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,264 |
Joe,
Excellent points. But therein lies the conundrum.
How much academic freedom exists when state colleges are dependent financially upon the government paid for by the electorate? I believe that this is one of the reasons why universities by and large lean left politically.
Gordo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 936
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 936 |
Well, I suppose I am going to have to defend these institutions. Higher education in the United States is about academic freedom. For an excellent analysis of academic freedom, go here: http://www.thomasaquinas.edu/about/bluebook/03.htm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398 |
Or, for another perspective, see Kant, An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?
http://www.english.upenn.edu/~mgamer/Etexts/kant.html
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,398 |
The problem I have with this analysis is that it assumes that there are truths that are absolutely beyond question and doubt. Now, for a Church university that is fine (although I take exception to a number of assertions made in the essay), but how can this standard possibly apply to a public university?
|
|
|
|
|