I think I've mentioned this before, but, while I heartily support His Beatitude Cyril Mar Baselios's claim to the title "Catholicos", I find his reasoning a bit amusing:
Originally posted by Pavel Ivanovich:
Baselios told reporters here on Wednesday that according to the tradition of the Syro-Malankara Church, those who were being elevated to the post of Major Archbishop would automatically become a Catholicos.
This "tradition" in the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church, that all Major Archbishops of the Church automatically receive the title of "Catholicos", is certainly a
very young tradition, since His Beatitude Cyril Mar Baselios made this statement less than a year after the Church got its first Major Archbishop. Wouldn't it make more sense if he said something like, "Because the powers and dignity of the Major Archbishop in the Eastern Catholic Churches are roughtly equivalent to the powers and dignity of the Catholicos in the Eastern non-Catholic Churches, we think it would more sense for the head of our
sui juris Church to be called "Catholicos" rather than (or, at the very least, in addition to) the very western-sounding "Major Archbishop."?
Again, I think the title of "Catholicos" is entirely appropriate for the Major Archbishop of the Syro-Malanakara Church (and I wish the Major Archbishop of the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church would use the title of "Catholicos" as well!), but I find Cyril Mar Baselios's reasoning a bit ridiculous.
(Please understand that I mean no offence! If I have caused any, I apologize! OK, I'll be quiet now.

)
Peace,
Alex NvV