The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Regf2, SomeInquirer, Wee Shuggie, Bodhi Zaffa, anaxios2022
5,881 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
2 members (2 invisible), 307 guests, and 28 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,295
Members5,881
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,960
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,960
Sarum,

If you are not one of those who are included in my "most of you" than you have nothing to worry about. Do you?

This thread is a classic example of how an occasion for joy easily turns into an opportunity for a horde of critics at a fashion show. Gold thread? Silver lining? Was the fold old way or new way? Staff not fit the model? Too much ankle? Lace is out; silk is in.

Joe

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 589
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 589
Dear David,

No, David, your Hierarchy does not need my advises in order to choose a name for your Byzantine Catholic Church. I just express my personal oppinion about the election of the name. I consider that it is my right to express my personal oppinions here and it is your right not to take these oppinions into account.

Certainly the name recession is not a familiar term for me (I prefer the term tradition or use: the Romanian Byzantine tradition, the Melkite Byzantine use...). In some of the posts in this forum some of you use the term recession as synonymous of liturgical tradition or use (The Ruthenian recession=the liturgical uses of the Ruthenian Church)whereas other peope use the term recession when talking about the text of the Divine Liturgy or the edition of the liturgical texts (the Roman edition for the Ruthenians versus the Ruthenian recession). Could you, please, tell me about the exact meaning of this term in the studies of the Byzantine liturgy (in Robert Taft for example, who has writen a lot about the Ruthenian liturgical tradition)? Sincerely I do not know what exactly means.
Yours in Christ

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,960
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,960
Francisco,

You don't get it, do you? Yes, you did congratulate Fr. Deacon John, but quickly added your comments about Bishop William's bad taste.

What gives, Francisco? Why do you go on about the naming of our Church? Should the Orthodox Church in America (OCA) change its name since there are other churches in America that consider themselves as Orthodox too? See where this leads? Its petty. Leave it be.

Let us truly congratulate Fr. Deacon John on his recent ordination to the diaconate without the off-the-cuff opinions.

I suggest that the moderator or Administrator close this thread. It is beginning to serve no purpose.

I shall now go back into silence. This pettiness is inviting a number of logismoi into my mind and heart.

Good bye,
Joe

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,042
novice O.Carm.
Member
Offline
novice O.Carm.
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,042
Francisco,

When I speak of recession I guess I am talking about liturgical tradition, which may be wrong on my part.

You seem to deny that there is anything different between the Liturgical Traditions of the Churches that are part of the Byzantine Rite. I think you are wrong here.

You also seem quick to pounce when you perceive something to be a latinization. Which, even if it is a latinization, you are wrong to do.

As what you, and others (myself included) may call a latinization, is the Tradition that many of our brothers and sisters grew up with, not knowing that it was a latinization.

We must be conscious of this fact, it would be just as wrong to pull the carpet out from under these people abruptly.

Yes, we must restore our Byzantine Traditions but we must do so at a reasonable pace and with proper explanation and education. We must also remember that the traditions of one church are not necessarily the same as others.

We should also work within our respective churches to help this change along. Pointing out failures within other churches does not help this, especially when all you seem to do is criticize the hierarchs.


David

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,075
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,075
If David is reading Francisco right, then I totally agree with him.

Latinizations are bad but we can't make our elders feel unwelcome. A lot of love and a lot of explaining must be done.

And there are differences between the Ruthenian (both Rusyn and Ukrainian)/Russian/Greek recensions (liturgical uses) while recession can also refer to editions of liturgical books.

anastasios

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 421
Moderator
Offline
Moderator
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 421
Quote
Originally posted by J Thur:


I suggest that the moderator or Administrator close this thread. It is beginning to serve no purpose.
Agreed. What began as a celebration of the ordination of one of our own has quickly degenerated. The thread is now closed.

Many years to Fr. Deacon John Montalvo!! AXIOS, AXIOS, AXIOS!

[Linked Image]

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Father Anthony 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5