The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Regf2, SomeInquirer, Wee Shuggie, Bodhi Zaffa, anaxios2022
5,881 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
5 members (Fr. Al, theophan, 3 invisible), 107 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#246904 07/29/07 01:48 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 47
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 47
Have there been many Uniate theologians in the past willing explicitly to propound Palamitic doctrine? If so, does anyone know of any controversy with Latin Catholics which this might have occasioned?

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 2
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 2
Fr. George Maloney (S.J.) was an Eastern Catholic, and to the best of my knowledge he was an advocate of the so-called "Palamitic" theology.

That said, prior to his death in 2005 he converted to Eastern Orthodoxy.

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,125
E
Za myr z'wysot ...
Member
Offline
Za myr z'wysot ...
Member
E
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,125
Raymond,

I certainly don't know of any. In my diaconal training, we read from Orthodox theologians almost exclusively, but I believe this is a relatively new phenomenon. Vatican II called on us to return to our Eastern roots, and that call is being implemented, albeit slowly. Perhaps in the near future we will come to know some EC theologians who are propounding Palamitic doctrine explicitly.

It was my understanding that Palamas' work is considered a compendium of the teachings of the Eastern Fathers, and not a unique school of theology.

FWIW, the Ukrainian Catholic Church does celebrate St. Gregory Palamas on the Second Sunday of the Great Fast, while the Ruthenians do not.


Peace,
Deacon Richard

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 490
Likes: 1
G
Member
Offline
Member
G
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 490
Likes: 1
Quote
FWIW, the Ukrainian Catholic Church does celebrate St. Gregory Palamas on the Second Sunday of the Great Fast, while the Ruthenians do not.

The Melkite Church also celebrates this Feast. While I don't know the names of any major Palamite theologians, I don't see how it would be a problem in the Catholic Church in any way. Our priest certainly gave a "Palamitic" homily on the Saint's Feast Day, and generally reflects a Palamite view of the faith though he's not a theologian per se.

Peace and God bless!

Ghosty #246917 07/29/07 04:47 AM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 47
S
Member
OP Offline
Member
S
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 47
Yes, the deacon who preached on his feastday at my (Roumanian) parish this year delivered an impassioned defense of the saint against those that would consider him an innovator.

I'm just interested to see if the likes of Bl. Theodore Romzha, St. Josaphat Kuncevyc, or folks like this, hard-core papists, let slip a little Palamism now and again. (At the time of Romzha, though, I don't think Palamas was on the Ukrainian Calendre, was he? I thought Slipyj brought him on.) It seems like such an important question for me, and I'm anxious to know what our saints have had to say about it.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
It was indeed Patriarch Joseph - who was no mean theologian - who brought about the restoration of Saint Gregory Palamas in the Greek-Catholic service books. He did his in a thorough and learned votum written at the invitation of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which on the strength of Patriarch Joseph's research agreed that Saint Gregory is legitimate for such purposes.

I don't recall meeting any respectable theologians lately who consider Saint Gregory's work false. Then again, if I met such a theologian, I would hardly be likely to consider him respectable!

I've also never met anyone who calls himself a "Uniate Palamist", whatever that might hypothetically be.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 773
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 773
We Byzantine Catholics should embrace Palamite theology, it is part of our heritage, which we must reclaim.

I am reading the Triads by St. Gregory, his theology resonates in my soul.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 1
A
Hi!
Member
Offline
Hi!
Member
A
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Epiphanius
FWIW, the Ukrainian Catholic Church does celebrate St. Gregory Palamas on the Second Sunday of the Great Fast, while the Ruthenians do not.


Actually, I am pretty sure that St. Palamas is on the Ruthenian calendar.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,231
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,231
He might be on the calendar, but he ain't in the new pew books!

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,125
E
Za myr z'wysot ...
Member
Offline
Za myr z'wysot ...
Member
E
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,125
Originally Posted by Allyson
Actually, I am pretty sure that St. Palamas is on the Ruthenian calendar.
Allyson,

Perhaps this was added back with the introduction of the RDL? biggrin


Peace,
Deacon Richard

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
E
Member
Offline
Member
E
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
Originally Posted by St_Josaphat_Kuncevyc
Have there been many Uniate theologians in the past willing explicitly to propound Palamitic doctrine? If so, does anyone know of any controversy with Latin Catholics which this might have occasioned?

What is a Uniate theologian? is this a form of Monism or Unitarianism?

"willing explicitly to propound Palamitic doctrine"??? This gives me the image of a vicious cougar ready to pounce on non-suspecting Catholics. Roar-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r!!!!

Discussion (or debate?) was held about this "saint" awhile back. The topic was sparked by the observation that the new Byzantine Catholic worship books didn't have him in there. I don't know if this is or was "controversial" but it did point out how this saint (and his theology) has been debunked in contemporary Byzantine Catholic worship. Latin Catholics were not involved, so it seems to be more of an internal issue. Maybe Byzantine Catholics on these forums can best answer? I am just an observer.

Meow!
Eddie

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
D
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
Offline
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
D
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Originally Posted by Serge Keleher
It was indeed Patriarch Joseph - who was no mean theologian - who brought about the restoration of Saint Gregory Palamas in the Greek-Catholic service books. He did his in a thorough and learned votum written at the invitation of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which on the strength of Patriarch Joseph's research agreed that Saint Gregory is legitimate for such purposes.

Fr. Serge

Fr. Serge,

How can I get my hands on this votum? A few years ago, I took a course at St. Tikhon of Zadonsk OCA seminary on Orthodox Spirituality. The primary text was "Orthodox Spirituality", by Fr. Dimitru Staniloae, a strong defender of Palamism. In my research for a paper on Catholic v.s. Orthodox approaches to union with God, I could have used something like this (although I still managed to pull an "A" in the course).

In Christ,
Dn. Robert

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Even though Patriarch Joseph brought about the restoration of St Gregory Palamas - this does not mean that his cult is by any means popular in the UGCC.

In fact, it is opposed in many locales.

Alex

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 2
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 2
Truly sad.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Todd,

Yes absolutely! The UGCC especially is an Eastern Catholic Church but one where there is confusion over the idea that "Catholic" means "we must have Latinisms to show we are not Orthodox." Although not in all parishes, to be sure.

Opposition to his cult is primarily based on the view of our Roman-trained priests that he was canonized after 1054 AD and they also remember the vitriolic attacks against Palamas by Western theologians of former years.

The fact that Sts. Volodymyr and Olha, who figure highly in the UGCC calendar, of course, were themselves canonized not by the Catholic Church, but by the Orthodox Church, seems lost on many.

Alex


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Alice, Father Deacon Ed, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5