The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Regf2, SomeInquirer, Wee Shuggie, Bodhi Zaffa, anaxios2022
5,881 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 89 guests, and 25 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 7 of 18 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 17 18
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Originally Posted by EdHash
Originally Posted by ebed melech
The analogy of the Four Gospels is simply brilliant. I have never heard the idea of complimentarity between theological approaches expressed that way before. Bravo for originality and insight!

Gordo. Thank you. But there are those who insist that ONLY the Synoptic Evangelists are correct and thta John is so-so. This sounds similar to various catholic teachings whereby one version is more correct than another.
Ed

The only person that I've ever heard this nonsense from was Luther, who wrote that the Gospel according to St. John was the purest truth of the Scriptures.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Originally Posted by EdHash
Originally Posted by Dr. Eric
I have already written that I know of at least one if not two Orthodox Churches also named Assumption. So you see that the Orthodox also name their churches after the Assumption of the Theotokos, which you claim is not in the Bible.

And how many Orthodox teachers have complained that their teaching has been mixed with the ideas of the scholastics?
Ed

Both Churches freely proclaim the Assumption of the Holy Theotokos. The Western Church emphasizes her Assumption like Enoch and Elias before her. The Eastern Church emphasizes her peaceful death.

My, you have changed in your tone from earlier.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
E
EdHash Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
E
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
Originally Posted by FrDeaconEd
Originally Posted by EdHash
So far no one has given me any answer why Byzantine Catholics prefer to side with their Roman Catholic associates when it comes to naming their holy days and what day to have them on?
Actually, I don't think there's a "reason" for what you call siding with Roman Catholics. There is a common patrimony and, due to the vagaries of history, there was an adoption of some Latin names for feasts that were already present in the East. Most of the Eastern Churches are moving back toward their traditions, but the people who have grown accustomed to particular terminology must be respected.

I have followed the arguments for and against the new Byzantine mass and it seems that this respect hasn't been given. O nthe other hand, words have been changed (Theotokos) as part of a mandate, but others (Christians of the True Faith) have been allowed to survive. It seesm that many on these forums have no problem being called *Orthodox* and have demonstrated over the years that it is the proper term. If *Theotokos* has been re-accepted into the corpus of worhsip terminology, why not *Orthdox*? My point or observation (not all comments are questions) still holds true from my first post. True Catholics cannot be Orthodox and this is the reason for choosing terminology. It is a matter of being accepted, not teaching one's own theology. Others have brought up the point about *Uniatism* and I wonder if this phenomenon is more a matter of uniatism rather than Catholicism.

Ed Hashinsky

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
E
EdHash Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
E
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
Originally Posted by Dr. Eric
Both Churches freely proclaim the Assumption of the Holy Theotokos. The Western Church emphasizes her Assumption like Enoch and Elias before her. The Eastern Church emphasizes her peaceful death.

I read the texts and the Apostles only found an empty tomb after three days. That is all. no more
Ed

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Originally Posted by EdHash
Originally Posted by Dr. Eric
Both Churches freely proclaim the Assumption of the Holy Theotokos. The Western Church emphasizes her Assumption like Enoch and Elias before her. The Eastern Church emphasizes her peaceful death.

I read the texts and the Apostles only found an empty tomb after three days. That is all. no more
Ed

Was she stolen or eaten by dogs? Are you a follower of Crossan?

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
E
EdHash Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
E
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
at a Catholic campus, I was told that the Synoptic Gospels were the more correct Gospels! This was because they believe that the Last Supper was a Passover Meal, hence the reason why THEY and not the Eastern Christians, were correct in using unleavened bread for their communion. John was in the minority. Thta the Byzzantines use his Gospel beginning on Easter only proves their point that they are of the minoroty teaching.
Ed

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Exodus 20:12

John 19:27

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
E
EdHash Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
E
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
Originally Posted by Dr. Eric
Originally Posted by EdHash
I read the texts and the Apostles only found an empty tomb after three days. That is all. no more
Ed

Was she stolen or eaten by dogs? Are you a follower of Crossan?

Crossan is stupid. Ever read Lee Strobel? someof his interviews are with Catholics and they are very good.

I don't know if Mary was stolen or eaten by dogs. YOUR church hymns only have her missing. Clue me in on whether there is more to the story.

Ed

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Originally Posted by EdHash
at a Catholic campus, I was told that the Synoptic Gospels were the more correct Gospels! This was because they believe that the Last Supper was a Passover Meal, hence the reason why THEY and not the Eastern Christians, were correct in using unleavened bread for their communion. John was in the minority. Thta the Byzzantines use his Gospel beginning on Easter only proves their point that they are of the minoroty teaching.
Ed

Spell checker.

Paula White calls for everyone to follow Yom Kippur, and I can turn on the TV at breakfast and watch a guy hand out healing hankies and water. This doesn't mean that all Protestants see this as what the Gospel calls for.

Do these people share your views?


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
E
EdHash Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
E
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
My reply was in regards to discussions and teachings between Catholics. Some of the most horrendous arguments in religion class were between Eastern Catholics and Western Christians. Eastern Catholics supported Saint Augustine and Thomas Aquinas, whereas Roman Catholics liked the Cappadocians and Saint Chrysostom! I found it amazing that a Lutheran was defending Chrysostom and Photius, whereas the Eastern Catholics were calling John Chrysostom a lesser doctor ofthe Catholic chruch and Photius a heretic because he defied Rome. I was really confused.
Ed


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 571
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 571
Ed,

You imply that you attended a Catholic college, and attended religion classes (or theology classes?), but the doctrines you mention don't sound very Catholic to me. Dr. Eric even wondered if you might be following John Dominic Crossan (a heretic if there ever was one). What were the "big name" Catholic theologians that you heard about; not the Fathers, just more recent theologians.

Michael

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Originally Posted by EdHash
Originally Posted by Dr. Eric
Originally Posted by EdHash
I read the texts and the Apostles only found an empty tomb after three days. That is all. no more
Ed

Was she stolen or eaten by dogs? Are you a follower of Crossan?

Crossan is stupid. Ever read Lee Strobel? someof his interviews are with Catholics and they are very good.

I don't know if Mary was stolen or eaten by dogs. YOUR church hymns only have her missing. Clue me in on whether there is more to the story.

Ed

Since we fight over the relics of St. Nicholas, the Icon of Kazan, etc... if there were any relics of her in existence do you not think that we'd still be fighting over them? From the beginning, we have treasured holy relics. Hers would be the most treasured of them all!

2 Kings 2:13-14
2 Kings 13:20-21
Acts 19:11-12


The rest of the story is found at the end of the 11th Chapter and the beginning of the 12th Chapter of the Apocalypse according to St. John.

I know we're not supposed to engage in apologetics here, may I be forgiven for defending Our Blessed Mother.

__________________________________________________________________

My kids are up so I have to sign out.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
E
EdHash Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
E
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
Originally Posted by Orthodox Catholic
So, from a liturgical standpoint, WHY does the Church celebrate the Conception of these Saints - it also celebrates their Nativities, but it goes beyond that - it goes to the very moment of their Conception in the wombs of their mothers.

Again, why these two alone?

Just as you feel you are not getting an answer to your question, I have yet to receive an answer to mine here.

Alex. Why do the Catholics put the United States under the patronage of the Immaculate Conception and not under the Annunciation? both are days remembering the conceptions. HOwever, Mary's conception, not Jesus Lord, is the more important one. Even huge cathedral-like shrines are built to honor hers. Jesus doesn't seem to be very important, not even his conception. am I mistaken?
Ed

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Originally Posted by EdHash
Originally Posted by Orthodox Catholic
So, from a liturgical standpoint, WHY does the Church celebrate the Conception of these Saints - it also celebrates their Nativities, but it goes beyond that - it goes to the very moment of their Conception in the wombs of their mothers.

Again, why these two alone?

Just as you feel you are not getting an answer to your question, I have yet to receive an answer to mine here.

Alex. Why do the Catholics put the United States under the patronage of the Immaculate Conception and not under the Annunciation? both are days remembering the conceptions. HOwever, Mary's conception, not Jesus Lord, is the more important one. Even huge cathedral-like shrines are built to honor hers. Jesus doesn't seem to be very important, not even his conception. am I mistaken?
Ed

YES.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
E
EdHash Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
E
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
Originally Posted by Michael McD
Ed,

You imply that you attended a Catholic college, and attended religion classes (or theology classes?), but the doctrines you mention don't sound very Catholic to me. Dr. Eric even wondered if you might be following John Dominic Crossan (a heretic if there ever was one). What were the "big name" Catholic theologians that you heard about; not the Fathers, just more recent theologians.

Michael

Dominic Crossan IS a heretic; along with his other disgruntled minions.

I am familiar with Boadt, Brown, Schillebeeckx, Pelikan (actually Orthodox), Blenkinsopp, Meier, Greeley, Pennington, John Paul II, Rahner.

The late John Paul II's teaching on the theology of the body seems to have found disfavor amongst egalitarians who refuse to see differences between men and women. I think he was a prophet.

Ed

Page 7 of 18 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 17 18

Moderated by  Alice, Father Deacon Ed, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5