The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Regf2, SomeInquirer, Wee Shuggie, Bodhi Zaffa, anaxios2022
5,881 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (Protopappas76), 256 guests, and 21 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Dr Eric,

That could certainly be one of those three portions Origen mentions!

Alex

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Dr. Alex,

Do you think that the part I posted is only a bit of it?

Dr. Eric

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Dr Eric,

I don't really know, but Origen insisted it was divided into three portions - it could have been further subdivided.

What is clear is that both East and West have well-developed Staurologies that are distinct from one another, but rich in meaning.

Crosses can also represent entire Particular Churches and traditions (i.e. the Huguenot Cross, Celtic etc.).

Certainly in Ukraine along the Carpathian border where there was pressure to become RC, the Ukrainian Catholic and Orthodox Churches tended to have a lot of three-Bar Crosses with the slanted footrest - even more than in Eastern Ukraine. That Cross became a "national" Cross.

Also, it is interesting that in Orthodoxy and ECism, a one-bar pectoral Cross actually represents a higher position than the three-bar pectoral Cross (the Kyivan Metropolitan has a one-bar Cross, for example, although this rule doesn't apply to the Old Believers).

Alex

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Does that mean that a priest will have a 3 bar cross while the Metr. will have a 1 bar cross?

Fascinating!

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Dr Eric,

Yes sir! In the West, it is the opposite, with the Pope having a three bar Cross signifying his higher authority.

Alex

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
[Linked Image]

Pope St. Silvester

Who as far as I know never said "Sufferin' Succotash!" biggrin

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Dr Eric,

Yes, excellent! Proof positive that the West also has a three-Bar Cross!

This is the patron saint of my godfather, Sylvester Remeza whom I always called on the feast of St Sylvester (in the East, it falls in January).

I only saw him once in my life (not counting the day he held me for my baptism). I was 30 years old when I drove to Ottawa to finally see him in the flesh. After he opened the door, my first response to his greeting was, "Godfather how are you?! You haven't changed much since last I saw you . . ." wink )

It took him all but two seconds to chuckle loudly at that smile

And if my wife ever let me have a cat, I'd call him, "Sylvester" for sure!

Cheers, Doc

Alex

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
All the traditionalists I know want Pope Benedict to get rid of JPII's "twisted Crucifix crosier" and re-instate the old papal three-bar cross "crosier."

What self-respecting Byzantine would disagree? wink

Alexis

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Alexis,

I think they also want him to go back to wearing the Triple Tiara as well. But, you and I both know that he actually took it out of his coat of arms.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 255
Православный мирян
Member
Offline
Православный мирян
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 255
Originally Posted by Jakub.
They have a few beautiful Scriptual Crosses at;

http://www.gallerybyzantium.com

also old believers etc...

I currently wear the Mt. Athos Cross...

james


I have the Holy Resurrection cross on me right now.

Tim

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 704
R
Bill from Pgh
Member
Offline
Bill from Pgh
Member
R
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 704
Originally Posted by Logos - Alexis
All the traditionalists I know want Pope Benedict to get rid of JPII's "twisted Crucifix crosier" and re-instate the old papal three-bar cross "crosier."

What self-respecting Byzantine would disagree? wink

Alexis

Dear Alexis,

Please do not take this offensively, but maybe you need to pull away from these "traditionalists" and the mindset for a while. The phrase "more Catholic than the Pope" comes to mind. One must always distinguish between traditional and tradition.

Being alive and kicking for only two thousand some odd years the Church continues to go through growing pains, the past forty or so being quite tumultuous as well as quite enlivening for the western church, all the while still preserving the deposit of faith.

Glory to God!

Bill...Roman Catholic traditionalist, born and bred.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
By traditionalist, I mean those of us who value our Roman liturgical patrimony, both extant and extinct.

I would love to see the Pope with the three-bar cross/crosier.

And I'd love to see the Tiara back, too, but I'm not counting on it.

And the Sedia Gestatoria for inside St. Peter's. The Popemobile makes sense for outside, but the Sedia is a generous and charitable concession for those inside, all of whom wish to see the Pope. The Sedia (as well as the Popemobile outside) allow for more of the faithful to have the privilege andd satisfaction of seeing the Pope.

Thanks for your concern, Bill, I certainly do understand it, but we can never be wrong to cling to tradition!

Alexis

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 704
R
Bill from Pgh
Member
Offline
Bill from Pgh
Member
R
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 704
Dear Alexis,

I know your heart is in the right place.
When I was a kid every priest wore a cassock in and around the church and school grounds, every nun wore a full habit. About the sixth grade many of the nuns dropped the full habit but by the new dress were still easily identifiable as nuns.

Though priests and nuns should be indentifiable by their dress in public I don't want priests in cassocks and nuns in full habits as much as I want good, holy and orthodox priests and nuns. My point is there are tougher "rows to hoe" than the Pope's crosier.

God Bless,
Bill

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Bill,

But show me a priest in overalls who sits at the kitchen table with a leg on top of a chair and I'll show you a cleric who thinks that David didn't slay Goliath, but "kicked the crap out of him."

As I experienced to my horror at one time . . .

Alex

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964
Fascinating! This sounds like the Old Believers held a view of Christ which is closer to that of the Latin Church than that of the Nikonian-reformed Russian Church?

Originally Posted by AMM
This is probably unrelated, but I remember reading something in James Billington's "The Icon and the Axe" that interested me at the time. What I seem to recall was that one of the flash points for the Old Believers was with depictions of Christ and the sign of the cross specifically. Namely in that by changing the way the sign of the cross was done, that somehow the change itself had taken Christ from the Old Believer's, or at least the Christ they knew. It was not just a change in rubrics.

The Old Believers identified not with the majestic risen Christ of the Byzantines (represented in the Nikonian reforms), but to the suffering Christ. The author I believe said Avvakum simply wanted the old Christ back, which to him was the suffering Christ of the Russian frontier.

Can anyone on the Forum elaborate on this topic?

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5