|
2 members (melkman2, 1 invisible),
150
guests, and
20
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,295
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564 |
Why do you think it's called the Colonial Office?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 372
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 372 |
Because they like BattleStar Galactica?
Just a thought....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,658 Likes: 3
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,658 Likes: 3 |
Most of the problem is that many of the Eastern bishops don't have the intestinal fortitude that Patriarch Lobomyr, Patriarch Joseph, Patriarch Gregorios, and a few others have exhibited. They prefer to let the Vatican do the decision making for them, and act as if they are powerless. One is only as powerless as they make themselves - especially as it concern one's legitimate rights.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411 |
The relationship between the Roman and the Eastern Catholic Churches is one of the major stumbling blocks to Unity. I would tend to doubt that.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,132
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,132 |
Most of the problem is that many of the Eastern bishops don't have the intestinal fortitude that Patriarch Lobomyr, Patriarch Joseph, Patriarch Gregorios, and a few others have exhibited. They prefer to let the Vatican do the decision making for them, and act as if they are powerless. One is only as powerless as they make themselves - especially as it concern one's legitimate rights. Well said, brother.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,084 Likes: 12
Global Moderator Member
|
Global Moderator Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,084 Likes: 12 |
The posts subsequent to the above and focusing on multiple jurisdictions have been relocated to the East-N-West Forum and the thread containing them has been retitled - Multiple Jurisdictions - 'One Bishop, One City'. This thread is dedicated to the subject of the jurisdictional issues involving the Latin and Syro-Malabarese Churches in India. While there is some overlap between the two topics - principally as regards comparison with the situation in other places - the postings that were moved have taken on a life and subject that is so much broader as to negatively affect continued discussion of the very specific and important concerns raised in this thread and Father Anthony's request that the new subject be moved elsewhere appears to have gone unnoticed. I'd ask that posters choose between the two threads in determining to which topic their post is most relevant. Many years, Neil
"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028 |
Three questions:
1. Are there no attempts to unify the Catholic Malankars and the Catholic Malabars into a single jurisdiction?
2. Is there still talk of eventually merging the Malabars and the Latin Catholics into a single "Indian Catholic Church" in communion with Rome? I recall reading that there were strong movements towards that goal in the 1970's, which accounted for much of the "modernization" and "Indianization" of the Malabar liturgy, since many at that time were hoping to eventually amalgamate the two largest groups of Indian Catholics into one inculturated jurisdiction.
3. Are there any schismatic movements brewing in the Malabar church?
Last edited by asianpilgrim; 12/14/08 03:46 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564 |
I know of no effort to merge the Syro-Malankara Church and the Syro-Malabar Church; I doubt that either would be interested.
Haven't heard much of the "One Rite Movement" for about thirty years.
Also haven't heard much of a schismatic movement in the Malabar Church - there doesn't seem to be any issue that would spark such a movement.
Fr. Serge
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,342
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,342 |
Shlomo Asian Pilgrim, I have to agree with Fr. Serge. To your 1st point: 1. Are there no attempts to unify the Catholic Malankars and the Catholic Malabars into a single jurisdiction? Since the two Churches now have for the last few centuries use different liturgies and I can not see either giving up their Holy Traditions. As to your next point: 2. Is there still talk of eventually merging the Malabars and the Latin Catholics into a single "Indian Catholic Church" in communion with Rome? I recall reading that there were strong movements towards that goal in the 1970's, which accounted for much of the "modernization" and "Indianization" of the Malabar liturgy, since many at that time were hoping to eventually amalgamate the two largest groups of Indian Catholics into one inculturated jurisdiction. Such talk as I understand it was primissed on the fact that the two Eastern Catholic Churches of India where (are) Lainized. With the Vatican pushing for Eastern Catholic Churches to embrace there Holy Traditions, such a move could not come about in this day and age. As to your last point: 3. Are there any schismatic movements brewing in the Malabar church? Other than the existing Orthodox Churches that exist (and the one Anglican Malabar Church) I have heard of no other breaks within the Malabar Church. Fush BaShlomo, Yuhannon
|
|
|
|
|