The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Regf2, SomeInquirer, Wee Shuggie, Bodhi Zaffa, anaxios2022
5,881 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
2 members (melkman2, 1 invisible), 150 guests, and 20 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,295
Members5,881
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
In 1948 the Communist regime approved a law stating that if the majority of the faithful of one parish decided to leave their Church and join another one, the temple would pass to the hands of the Church they would join. Greek-Catholics were forced to become Orthodox and rennounce Catholicism "oficially". This way most churches passed to the hands of the Orthodox Church.

After the fall of Communism, Greek Catholics have tried to recover their churches and temples. In some cases courts have ackowledged their rights but the Orthodox refuse to give them back the churches claiming that "the majority of the faithful are Orthodox". Sometimes, before a church is given by a court to the Greek Catholics, the Orthodox decide to demolish it first so that it would not be possible for the GC to recover that church.

Now, some neo-communist deputees in Romania's Parliament proposed a new law, that would "legalize" what happened in 1948 according to the principle of majority. This would mean that the Greek Catholics, being a minority, would not even have the right to ask for the devolution of their temples. It seems that the man behind this law is Bartolomeu Anania, the Orthodox Archbishop of Cluj who's known for his antipahy toward the Greek Catholic Church and Catholics in general.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 950
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 950
I assure the admin and the moderators I have no thought to argue, not at all.

I just look to this word:

Quote
It seems that the man behind this law

and to this kind of logic and argumentation

Quote
, the Orthodox Archbishop of Cluj who's known for his antipahy toward the Greek Catholic Church and Catholics in general.

History, wounds, rocked hearts, non-love, from a side to the other side.

And it 'seems' that we call ourselves Christians and that in a few weeks we will celebrate the Resurrection of the crucified Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Sorry, history doesn't begin in 1945.

Interesting what history is wanted to be revisted by some.

Forgive and forget.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by AMM
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Sorry, history doesn't begin in 1945.

Interesting what history is wanted to be revisted by some.

Forgive and forget.

Well, this thread started about someone wanting to remember something. For most (c. 90% in Romania), 1945 is as ancient as 1915 and beyond.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
The central act of the Eucharist is the Anamnesis, when we efficaciously remember The Holy Pascha is the pre-eminently efficacious remembering of a specific historical event. And so it is. One of the great defects of modernist liturgies is that they seem to have forgotten what it is that they are supposed to remember.

Fr. Serge

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by Serge Keleher
The central act of the Eucharist is the Anamnesis, when we efficaciously remember The Holy Pascha is the pre-eminently efficacious remembering of a specific historical event. And so it is. One of the great defects of modernist liturgies is that they seem to have forgotten what it is that they are supposed to remember.

Fr. Serge

I don't know if that is on point, but nonetheless well put.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by AMM
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Sorry, history doesn't begin in 1945.

Interesting what history is wanted to be revisted by some.

Forgive and forget.

Well, this thread started about someone wanting to remember something. For most (c. 90% in Romania), 1945 is as ancient as 1915 and beyond.

Wrongs were done in the past. The bishops should still take the high road and return any ill gotten gains. There's no excuse for not doing this in my opinion. Two wrongs don't make a right.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by AMM
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by AMM
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Sorry, history doesn't begin in 1945.

Interesting what history is wanted to be revisted by some.

Forgive and forget.

Well, this thread started about someone wanting to remember something. For most (c. 90% in Romania), 1945 is as ancient as 1915 and beyond.

Wrongs were done in the past. The bishops should still take the high road and return any ill gotten gains.


All bishops?

Quote
There's no excuse for not doing this in my opinion. Two wrongs don't make a right.

I agree.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Quote
All bishops?

Any in the Romanian Synod who have a say in the issue at hand.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by AMM
Quote
All bishops?

Any in the Romanian Synod who have a say in the issue at hand.

Which Romanian Synod or Synods are you speaking of?

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
A
Member
OP Offline
Member
A
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,028
Any updates on the situation in Romania?

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 100
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 100
There are very many trials about the churches given by the communists to the orthodox, there are churches demolished by the orthodox in order not to be given back.

The recent visit to the Vatican of romanian prime minister Emil Boc was a reason for the Holy See to underline the real situation of the catholics in Romania.The statements of the prime minister spoke only about the dialogue between greek-catholics and orthodox to solve the controversy but not about a law to give back the churches.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 100
F
Member
Offline
Member
F
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 100
http://bucharest.usembassy.gov/US_Policy/2008_IRF_Ro.html

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Father Anthony 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5