|
5 members (Fr. Al, theophan, 3 invisible),
107
guests, and
17
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 950
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 950 |
Being interested from teenage of maths and physics, I paid a special attention to thermodynamics and entropy. Concepts as system and entropy can apply very well to many matters as history, technology, human society et al. I found a text, what is your opinion? Entropy and causality used as a proof for God's existence
The second law of thermodynamics states that the amount of energy in a system that is available to do work is decreasing. Entropy increases as available energy decreases. In other words, the purely natural tendency of things is to move toward chaos, not order, and available energy necessary for work is lost (mostly as heat) in this process. Eventually, the universe will run down and all life and motion will cease. This is the natural tendency of all things. Batteries run down, machines break, buildings crumble, roads decay, living things die, etc. Left to the natural state, all things would eventually cease to function.
1. The universe is not infinitely old because it has not "run down."
1. If the universe were infinitely old, it would have reached a state where all usable energy was gone.
2. But, we are not in this state; therefore, the universe is not infinitely old and must have had a beginning.
2. Because the universe had a beginning, it is not infinite in size.
1. It would require an infinite amount of time to become infinite in size. Since the universe had a beginning, it has not had an infinite amount of time to expand; therefore, it is finite in size.
3. All events have causes.
1. There cannot be an infinite regress of events because that would mean the universe were infinitely old.
1. We've already established that the universe cannot be infinitely old.
2. If it were infinitely old, the universe would be in a state of unusable energy, which it is not.
3. If it were infinitely old, the universe would be infinitely large, which it is not.
4. Since the universe is finite and had a beginning, and there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to bring it into existence, there must be a single uncaused cause of the universe.
1. A single uncaused cause of the universe must be greater in size and duration than the universe it has brought into existence.
1. Otherwise, we have the uncaused cause bringing into existence something greater than, or equal to, itself.
2. Any cause that is natural to the universe is part of the universe.
1. An event that is part of the universe cannot cause itself to exist.
2. Therefore, there must be an uncaused cause outside the universe.
3. An uncaused cause cannot be a natural part of the universe, which is finite.
1. An uncaused cause would be infinite in both space and time since it is greater than which it has caused to exist.
4. An uncaused cause would be separate from the universe.
1. Being separate from the universe, which was caused to be, it would not be subject to the laws of the universe since it existed independent of the universe and its laws.
2. This would mean that entropy need not be required of the uncaused cause.
5. This uncaused cause is supernatural.
1. By supernatural, it is meant completely 'other' than the universe and is not the product of it.
1. This uncaused cause must be incredibly powerful to bring the universe into existence.
6. The Bible teaches that God is uncaused, is not part of the universe, created the universe, and is incredibly powerful.
1. God's existence (in Christianity) is not an event, but a state.
2. Psalm 90:2 says that God is God without a beginning.
3. This means that God is uncaused.
7. Therefore, the God of the Bible is the uncaused cause of the universe. This is the source [ carm.org] of the above text. marian+
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,208 Likes: 11
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,208 Likes: 11 |
In my opinion, this is not the way to go. The statements of science in the article are extremely imprecise, therefore, the foundation of the argument is poorly established. The transition from science, physics, into metaphysics is hardly as transparent as presented; the one verse "proof text" from scripture is trivial.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 950
Member
|
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 950 |
The transition from science, physics, into metaphysics is hardly as transparent as presented; the one verse "proof text" from scripture is trivial. I agree. Otherwise, I reason that there are some fundamental laws of physics, and thermodynamics offers the concept of entropy (is not here the place to discuss more), and if this concept is applied to the human society etc., I am not optimistic at all. Cannot prove the existence of God, but can show us that the way we go as human society is wrong. So many things to talk. God help!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564 |
Assuming that everything has run down, that no motion of any kind remains and that energy is all used up, how would God reverse entropy?
Answer: God would announce: "Let there be Light!"
Fr. Serge
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 950
Member
|
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 950 |
Answer: God would announce: "Let there be Light!"
Fr. Serge Amin!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564 |
Once there is Light, there is no longer static entropy. Intriguing that this corresponds to Genesis.
Fr. Serge
|
|
|
|
|
