|
4 members (theophan, 3 invisible),
118
guests, and
19
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2 |
I t also shows how frequently American Catholics were more concerned with being respectable than being good Catholics. What's changed?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 264
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 264 |
 The book's narrative concludes before present day, and so I used the past tense. Now that I think about it, if anything's changed, many American Catholics probably now honestly believe that being a respectable American is the exact same thing as being a good Catholic, where before it took mental gymnastics to justify this position. Booth
Last edited by Booth; 06/11/10 07:32 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2 |
Certainly, most Catholic bishops do.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930 |
This has really been an interesting history lesson. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564 |
I suggested one book of Father Andrew Greeley's, not the author himself. That said, it is better to treat him with kindness and charity, not with disdain.
Fr. Serge
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2 |
It's nothing personal, just interdisciplinary rivalry. I'm sure Greeley feels the same way about historians.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 700
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 700 |
Evey book and paper of Fr. Greeley's I've read has exhibited his heterodoxy. It seriously calls into question his thought processes, for, as a cleric to exhibit such heterodoxy in print shows a lack of good judgment. He's been a proponent of women's ordination, and of homosexual marriage. If, as a priest, he's in favor of such, it's a strong exhibition of a fundamentally flawed logic process.
People with that level of fallibility of logic generally do not have it limited to one field.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2 |
No, Aramis, it merely demonstrates the academic's ability to compartmentalize his thinking, which is what enables them to hold mutually contradictory beliefs simultaneously. Also, Greeley the Academic has an institutional conflict of interest with Greeley the cleric. The former wants to be respected in the faculty lounge, which means he has to back publicly positions that the latter ought to find abhorrent.
It's not too different from bishops who know they ought to condemn certain Catholic politicians for their words and actions, but who refrains because he still wants to be invited to the Al Smith Dinner.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 700
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 700 |
His academic works show a lack of clarity, IMO. Then again, most sociologists do. And people think those of us in History are fuzzy...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 396
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 396 |
I once heard it said of Andrew Greeley that he never had an unpublished thought. I tend to believe that every garden has weeds and that it is best to pull them before taking in the harvest. I am not sure he always does.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 36 |
No, Aramis, it merely demonstrates the academic's ability to compartmentalize his thinking, which is what enables them to hold mutually contradictory beliefs simultaneously. Like the doctrine of Jesus Christ being both God and Man? 
Last edited by Siddhazen; 06/21/10 03:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2 |
Like the doctrine of Jesus Christ being both God and Man? Unfortunately, that's one the intellectuals have never been able to wrap their minds around, probably because it demands not compartmentalization, but a breakdown of compartments and categories to understand.
|
|
|
|
|