|
0 members (),
327
guests, and
24
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431 |
and both the Copts and Roman Catholics don't agree there's only 7. the EOs and RCs agree that there aren't only 3. But I think Stuart hit on the thing we can all agree on: that there haven't been 22. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,029 Likes: 2
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,029 Likes: 2 |
And if, in a few hundred years, pigs learn to fly, what would that prove? Getty a pig to fly is quite simple. It's simply a matter of applying sufficient thrust . . .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2 |
What is the ballistic coefficient of a pig?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 396
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 396 |
Actually pigs, if they fold their legs properly, are quite aerodynamic. Also they are relatively easy to train. The difficult part is getting the rocket engines properly attached so they don't slip off the back.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309 Likes: 2 |
Ah, but what about guidance and control?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,029 Likes: 2
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,029 Likes: 2 |
We get a pig to fly, and now you get persnickety about *where* it's going to fly.
It's like the dancing bear . . .
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Member
|
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411 |
I confess I do not understand your question completely That's alright, they were all rather pointless actually.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431 |
That's alright, they were all rather pointless actually. I would hardly call them pointless, although they did get a bit impractical. For example, your follow-up question -- after I said "The majority of Catholics consider Ineffabilis Deus to be an ex cathedra statement because Pope John Paul II said it was" you asked "And why do they think that?"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Member
|
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411 |
The question is what would the common perception be of the post schism conciliar tradition that would lead them to believe the way that dogma was proclaimed made sense. Or in other words, what was the context for the proclamation of the dogma. I grant you that may be because "the Pope said it" and there isn't much more to it.
Anyway, it's a pointless question and I don't think people actually care.
Whatever the post schism conciliar tradition is to me remains a mystery.
|
|
|
|
|
