|
0 members (),
322
guests, and
25
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 564
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 564 |
Alex, Thanks for the story. It's a sad story though, but these stories make you think. I loved the icon. Icons like these and the cross that one of the martyrs was holding while being executed should travel around the world and be exibited in churches where they would be honored with prayers and akathists. These Holy items would only bring us closer to God and we would learn about the meaning of true Christian love. Lauro
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,698
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,698 |
Originally posted by ChristTeen287: It seems the Moscow Patriarchate is a serious pack-rat...of others' belongings.
ChristTeen287 Of course, the same could be said for Rome. Of course, Rome is making significant strides in returning some of this stuff (the bodies of Saints Andrew, Mark, and Luke, the Kazan Icon, etc.), but it's still got a lot. The major portion of the relics of Saint Thomas the Apostle, for example, lie in a church in Italy where people can venerate them, but do not love the saint nearly as much as we Indians do.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21 |
Dear Qathuliqa Mor Ephrem, You raise an intriguing point that actually goes well beyond the issue of "Hey, that's mine, give it back!" When we say that something like a relic or what-not was "stolen," what are we saying? The relics of St Nicholas were taken from Turkish-controlled Myra where he was Archbishop to Bari in Italy by Italian merchants. Some say this was "theft" of relics of an Eastern Saint by Roman Catholics. And yet, the Ukrainian Orthodox (and Catholic) Churches have the "Translation of the Relics of St Nicholas" as a major feastday on their calendar (May 9/22) and celebrate it as another feast of the popular Saint. The icon of the Black Madonna of Czestochowa was taken by Wladislaw Opolskie from Belz to Czestochowa where it became the "Queen of Poland." Ultimately, the Pope's own national Madonna that he loves so dearly was the object of an ancient theft. The Orthodox Saint Theodore of Ostrih, when he was a military commander, was in Czestochowa when he saw the Black Madonna icon and tried to take it down to take back to Ukraine with him . . . He was arrested and tried for "blasphemy" but he rebuffed his accusers saying, "That is an icon of Rus' and you had no right to take it!" Within national Churches, larger parishes would often appropriate the relics of smaller parishes etc. Arguments continue over where a saint's relics "should" rest etc. All I am suggesting is that it is not always clear what constitutes a "theft" of a religious object and whether its return would be for a greater spiritual benefit. An Icon that we had here was returned to Ukraine recently. But so what? It is now in a museum . . . Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,478 Likes: 5
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,478 Likes: 5 |
More news on the icon of Our Lady of Kazan returning to Russia... The Holy Father confirms his intention to return the icon. Read all about it at: www.stetson.edu/~psteeves/relnews/0303c.html#20 [ stetson.edu]
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 943
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 943 |
You see, the Catholic Church DOES NOT have to give these kind of stuff to the Orthodox, but out of goodness of our hearts, we do. What do we get in return from them? A slap in the face! That shows the greatness of the Catholc Church!
That's my humble 2 cents.
SPDundas Deaf Byzantine PS, Only the skull of St. Andrew was given to the Orthodox, not the body which is still buried in the Vatican.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21 |
Dear SPDundas, Yes, I agree the Catholic Church is great! But the RC Church plundered the East for years and stole many relics, icons etc. There is a political agenda behind the Vatican's "Let us give this back to you" policy. At the same time, the RC Church has shown that it simply does not understand the East and, as a result, continues to offend it. The RC Church does not take seriously its own ecclesiastical rhetoric about the Orthodox being a "Sister Apostolic Church" - actions in Russia speak louder than words. Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 175
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 175 |
SPDundas, why do your posts usually seem so angry? Moe
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ. -Mohandas Gandhi
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 441
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 441 |
Originally posted by spdundas: You see, the Catholic Church DOES NOT have to give these kind of stuff to the Orthodox, but out of goodness of our hearts, we do. What do we get in return from them? A slap in the face! That shows the greatness of the Catholc Church!
That's my humble 2 cents.
SPDundas Deaf Byzantine PS, Only the skull of St. Andrew was given to the Orthodox, not the body which is still buried in the Vatican. I don't know whether to be outraged or sad, so I guess I'll be both. SPDundas, have you ever heard of the Fourth Crusade? April 13th 1204 - what historians call "the greatest crime in history." I know that some think that Orthodox Christians should "get over it," but when I hear that we should be "thankful" that Rome "gives us" what is ours already, it's a little disconcerting. Read and learn. Nicetas Choniates: Alexii Ducae Imperium, ch. iii-iv, in Recueil des historiens des Croisades, hist. grec., 1, 397. Greek.
How shall I begin to tell of the deeds wrought by these nefarious men! Alas, the images, which ought to have been adored, were trodden under foot! Alas, the relics of the holy martyrs were thrown into unclean places! Then was seen what one shudders to hear, namely, the divine body and blood of Christ was spilled upon the ground or thrown about. They snatched the precious reliquaries, thrust into their bosoms the ornaments which these contained, and used the broken remnants for pans and drinking cups,-precursors of Anti-christ, authors and heralds of his nefarious deeds which we momentarily expect. Manifestly, indeed, by that race then, just as formerly, Christ was robbed and insulted and His garments were divided by lot; only one thing was lacking, that His side, pierced by a spear, should pour rivers of divine blood on the ground.
Nor can the violation of the Great Church [Hagia Sophia] be listened to with equanimity. For the sacred altar, formed of all kinds of precious materials and admired by the whole world, was broken into bits and distributed among the soldiers, as was all the other sacred wealth of so, great and infinite splendor.
When the sacred vases and utensils of unsurpassable art and grace and rare material, and the fine silver, wrought with go , which encircled the screen of the tribunal and the ambo, of admirable workmanship and the door and many other ornaments, were to be borne away booty, mules and saddled horses were led to the very sanctuary of the temple. Some of these which were unable to keep their footing the splendid and slippery pavement, were stabbed when they fell, that the sacred pavement was polluted with blood and filth.
Nay more, a certain harlot, a sharer in their guilt, a minister the furies, a servant of the demons, a worker of incantations and poisonings, insulting Christ, sat in the patriarch's seat, singing an obscene song and dancing frequently. Nor, indeed, were these crimes committed and others left undone, on the ground that these were of lesser guilt, the others of greater. But with one consent all the most heinous sins and crimes were committed by all with equal zeal. Could those, who showed so great madness against God Himself have spared the honorable matrons and maidens or the virgins consecrated to God?
Nothing was more difficult and laborious than to soften by prayers, to render benevolent, these wrathful barbarians, vomiting forth bile at every unpleasing word, so that nothing failed to inflame their fury. Whoever attempted it was derided as insane and a man of intemperate language. Often they drew their daggers against any one who opposed them at all or hindered their demands.
No one was without a share in the grief. In the alleys, in the streets, in the temples, complaints, weeping, lamentations, grief, the groaning of men, the shrieks of women, wounds, rape, captivity, the separation of those most closely united. Nobles wandered about ignominiously, those of venerable age in tears, the rich in poverty. Thus it was in the streets, on the corners, in the temple, in the dens, for no place remained unassailed or defended the suppliants. All places everywhere were filled full of all kinds of crime. Oh, immortal God, how great the afflictions of the men, how great the distress! Yes, we bow down to your greatness. And thanks for giving back St. Andrew's skull. Priest Thomas St. Nicholas Orthodox Church [ stnicholas-oca.org]
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21 |
Bless me a sinner, Father Thomas! What did you think of my post, then? Kissing your right hand, I again implore your blessing, Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 441
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 441 |
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic: Bless me a sinner, Father Thomas!
What did you think of my post, then?
Kissing your right hand, I again implore your blessing,
Alex May the Lord God bless you. It depends on what you mean by "great." Here are the definitions: (I guess everyone needs to pick one.) great 1. Very large in size. 2. Larger in size than others of the same kind. 3. Large in quantity or number: A great throng awaited us. See Synonyms at large. 4. Extensive in time or distance: a great delay. 5. Remarkable or outstanding in magnitude, degree, or extent: a great crisis. 6. Of outstanding significance or importance: a great work of art. 7. Chief or principal: the great house on the estate. 8. Superior in quality or character; noble: �For he was great, ere fortune made him so� (John Dryden). 9. Powerful; influential: one of the great nations of the West. 10. Eminent; distinguished: a great leader. Grand; aristocratic. 11. Informal. Enthusiastic: a great lover of music. 12. Informal. Very skillful: great at algebra. 13. Informal. Very good; first-rate: We had a great time at the dance. 14. Being one generation removed from the relative specified. Often used in combination: a great-granddaughter. 15. Archaic. Pregnant. PT
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21 |
Bless me a sinner, Father Thomas, I guess all of the above then! Actually, the first line of my post was largely incidental. I didn't want to upset any Catholics here. You know how sensitive some of them are when it comes to their church! Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 441
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 441 |
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic: You know how sensitive some of them are when it comes to their church! Yes indeed, we all are. PT
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317 Likes: 21 |
Bless me a sinner, Father Thomas! I wish you and your family every blessing from On High with the approaching Holy Week and Pascha. I don't know how you priests survive all those long services! You must have a special vocation or something! Kissing your right hand, I again implore your blessing, Alex
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,658 |
So Pope John Paul II finally gave up in his idea of having a tryumphal entrance in Moscow with the icon of Kazan?
|
|
|
|
|