The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Mora, DC, Maurelius, flintinsects, RomanPylypiv
6,099 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 323 guests, and 66 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,461
Posts417,211
Members6,099
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 320
Likes: 5
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 320
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by dochawk
An EC married by an RC *priest* is validly married.

The problem is when it's a deacon, which fails.

Isn't the bride's parish strongly preferred over the groom's, though?

It is my understanding that it is exactly the opposite, that tradition dictates that the marriage should be according to the rite of the groom, and that in a case such as this a special dispensation would be required for it to be according to the rite of the bride.

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 4
D
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 4
The involvement of the priest in an RC wedding is relatively recent in church terms.

He was often/typically an honored guest, and would bless the marriage.

It wasn't required that he witness the vows until the1300s or so, to deal with the couples who disappeared, returned, and told different stories as to whether or not they'd exchanged vows.

This led to a new abuse, in which the couple the couldn't get their families to agree would break into the rectory, wake up the priest, and exchange vows before he'd come to his senses.

This was corrected a little faster--a mere 700 years--in the late 20th century (1979?) revision to the code of canon law.

Joined: Sep 2024
Posts: 77
Likes: 1
J
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Sep 2024
Posts: 77
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Deacon John Montalvo
There is such a book, but it’s highly irregular for the Eastern priest to offer the nuptial blessing during a Latin liturgy. The Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, at least in the context of concelebration, directs the ministers to avoid liturgical syncretism (c. 701). All are to follow the liturgical books of the principal celebrant.

The **Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches** beautifully preserves the unique integrity of Eastern traditions, ensuring unity without losing richness. It's a valuable guide for maintaining liturgical identity.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Alice, Fr. Deacon Lance, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0