Friend, none of this really addresses the points I made, particularly that the Catholic tradition is less black and white than you have made it out to be. Though I would also ask you to be more respectful to our tradition, and not analyse it through calling it 'extra-Biblical' (are we sola scriptura?), 'fanciful 'or 'pure imagination'. Our 'aesthetic' sticks to a traditional method of mathematical proportion, and follows strict lines in depicting the invisible.
The western tradition also emphasises a distinction that is not drawn here (which I tried to draw out in the previous comment). St. Thomas himself notes a difference between imagination as our sense-experience (or 'phantasia', a term going back to St. Augustine) that can often be manipulated and wrongly-ordered, and rightly-ordered imaginatio, where phantasia must be subservient to the intellect (that which lets us know truth, and grasp an understanding of things).
If you disagree with the truthfulness of our traditions, please at least express this politely, and engaging with what I wrote.
turaŭski
Last edited by turaŭski; 10/03/26 10:01 AM.