The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Regf2, SomeInquirer, Wee Shuggie, Bodhi Zaffa, anaxios2022
5,881 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 262 guests, and 26 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Dr. Alex,

He might have a point since the Holy Apostle Andrew had a Greek name. wink

St. Peter was Simon which was a Hebrew name, why does his brother have a Greek name? I have heard that the family was well to do and very cosmopolitan and that's why Andrew (Andreas) was given the Greek name.

Father Anthony, what do you think? confused

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,225
Likes: 1
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,225
Likes: 1
Why Alex, that wee address was borrowed from...you !

And I have no problems with other opinions & thoughts...the more variety the better...I learned that from a blessed Polish Pope.

james

ps- I'm a humble and lovable guy...I do like Steve Martin...

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
Ray S. Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
Quote
How do you know they don't go to Mass when they get home?
Stats shows Mass attendance worldwide is way down. In some places in Europe its a single digit number.

Quote
You and I BOTH want to have Ray S. and Mexican ejected from here for their views on Pope John Paul the Great.
Gee, thanks Alex!

Quote
where would Eastern Europe/Iron Curtain countries be today if there was no election of blessed + Pope John Paul II ?
From the little I know, I think Ronald Reagan was the biggest reason for the fall of the Iron Curtain.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Offline
Catholic Gyoza
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,518
Quote
Originally posted by Ray S.:
Quote
[QUOTE] where would Eastern Europe/Iron Curtain countries be today if there was no election of blessed + Pope John Paul II ?
From the little I know, I think Ronald Reagan was the biggest reason for the fall of the Iron Curtain.
Not according to Gorbachev. He credits John Paul II.

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
Ray S. Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
Dr Eric,

Quote
Not according to Gorbachev. He credits John Paul II.
Too save face maybe?

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
Ray S. Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
Dr. Eric,

Here is another argument. Not mine but I find it refreshing to hear both sides of any story:
The Pope Didn\'t End Communism [slate.com]

His arguement goes like this:
The Pope had some influence in Poland. But most of the people in late communist era Eastern Europe were not Christians of any sort, let alone Catholics.

The real reason he argues is this:
The communist economies were stagnating and even in decline. The greater exposure to Westerners that came as a result of Nixon and Kissinger's negotiations with Moscow heightened the awareness of Eastern Europeans and Russians that they were falling hopelessly behind.

Quote
in East Germany, where almost everyone could watch West German TV (though they had to keep the volume way down because it was strictly verboten to watch, and if the neighbor heard, there could be trouble), people talked about their jealousy for the material goods that Westerners enjoyed�the clothes, the shoes, the cars, the food. They talked about their dreams of traveling outside the Soviet Bloc and about the hopes�mainly for a particular career or area of study�they'd had when they were young. And they talked about the freedom to say what they wanted or to teach their children about realities other than what the socialist state had ordained.

Even when I sat in churches for hours on end, talking to ministers, priests, and the generally nonreligious people who came there because of the more open atmosphere, the talk was of political freedom and consumer goods, not of faith.
Finally he argues,
In the Soviet Union it was the KGB itself that helped initiate reforms that eventually spun out of control. Why? The KGB had many people who had spent time in the West and they knew how far behind they were falling. Reagan's Star Wars initiative, while widely criticised in the United States as unachievable, worried the Soviet leaders who feared US technological advantages might be usable to develop weapons that would neutralize much of Russia's nuclear arsenal. Capitalism's triumph over communism motivated the reformers to try to find ways to keep up. The communist reformers set in motion changes that they failed to control. Widespread desires for a better life and a loss of faith in communism led to the collapse of the USSR and the freeing of Eastern Europe. Gorbachev's inept leadership undermined efforts to control the reforms. The Pope played a relatively small role by comparsion.

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437
Administrator
Member
Offline
Administrator
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,437
Quote
Originally posted by Dr. Eric:
He might have a point since the Holy Apostle Andrew had a Greek name. wink

St. Peter was Simon which was a Hebrew name, why does his brother have a Greek name? I have heard that the family was well to do and very cosmopolitan and that's why Andrew (Andreas) was given the Greek name.

Father Anthony, what do you think? confused
Dr Eric,

You may want to post this question in the Scripture Forum. Some that are a little better versed in the scriptures may actually have an some revealing answers. If i get time tonight I will look up the life of Saint Andrew in the Synaxarion from the Holy Mountain. It may reveal the answer to your question there.

In IC XC,
Father Anthony+


Everyone baptized into Christ should pass progressively through all the stages of Christ's own life, for in baptism he receives the power so to progress, and through the commandments he can discover and learn how to accomplish such progression. - Saint Gregory of Sinai
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217
Ray S and Mexican

I think the prevailing rule of thumb among Catholics today, is that one may speak very critically of any pre-V2 Popes, Urban II, Innocent III, Pius IX, Pius X, Pius XII etc, but NEVER of John XXIII or John Paul II.

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
Ray S. Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
Lawrence,

Quote
I think the prevailing rule of thumb among Catholics today, is that one may speak very critically of any pre-V2 Popes, Urban II, Innocent III, Pius IX, Pius X, Pius XII etc, but NEVER of John XXIII or John Paul II.
:rolleyes:
I must ask for forgiveness I forgot the new Post-Vatican II rule.

BTW, isn't there a cause for sainthood considered for all of the post-V2 popes?

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Quote
Originally posted by Lawrence:
Ray S and Mexican

I think the prevailing rule of thumb among Catholics today, is that one may speak very critically of any pre-V2 Popes, Urban II, Innocent III, Pius IX, Pius X, Pius XII etc, but NEVER of John XXIII or John Paul II.
? Really? You may be right about John XXIII, who after all only reigned a short time and is considered saintly by almost everyone - though you will admit the Council he called has been the subject of some rather harsh criticism.

And John Paul II? He's criticized by both the right (for "kissing the Koran") and the left (for being such a "hard liner" and refusing to allow birth control, gay marriage and female priests).

Me, I have no real problem with either of them being canonized, but that doesn't mean they'll be beyond criticism. There are plenty of canonized saints I'd like to have a looong talk with - St. Jerome for one. wink

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
Ray S. Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
There is a cause for Pope John Paul I. Correct?

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Quote
Originally posted by Ray S.:
There is a cause for Pope John Paul I. Correct?
Yeah, looks like it:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/06/05/world/printable557141.shtml

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
Ray S. Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 1
So since Vatican II we have had the following Popes:

Blessed John XXIII (1958-63)
Paul VI (1963-78)
John Paul I (1978)
John Paul II (1978-2005)

Blessed John XXIII is up for canonization.

Paul VI cause is being started by Jesuit Father Paolo Molinari, who did the cause for Saint Mother Teresa.

John Paul I cause has started.

John Paul II cause has started.

Benedict XVI will have to wait and see.

So, that means so far all Post-Vatican II Popes will probably be called Saints.

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,217
I think Lech Walesa played a very important role in bringing down communism. I still remember when Solidarnosc posters and stickers were everywhere in Chicago.

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,225
Likes: 1
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,225
Likes: 1
Well RayS,

I only can say...Solidarnosc !

james

ps-does anybody know how difficult it is coming from Italian/Polish family wink ...oy vey

Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Alice, Father Deacon Ed, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5