|
1 members (1 invisible),
323
guests, and
20
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,295
Members5,881
| |
Most Online3,380 Dec 29th, 2019
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268 |
Breaking news from Catholic World News: Pope will broaden use of Latin Mass
Vatican, Oct. 11 (CWNews.com) - Pope Benedict XVI (bio - news) is preparing to release a motu proprio extending permission for priests to celebrate the traditional Latin Mass, Vatican sources have confirmed.
The new papal document-- for which a publication date has not yet been set-- would give all priests permission to celebrate the Mass of St. Pius V. This permission, a "universal indult," would replace the existing indult that dates back to 1988, when Ecclesia Dei authorized use of the Tridentine rite until more restricted conditions, requiring the permission of the local bishop. This bodes well for the future and makes one of the "demands" of the SSPX moot! Amado
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Jessup B.C. Deacon Member
|
Jessup B.C. Deacon Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346 |
I subscribe to Catholic World News, and think it's a fine publication. But, take notice of the phrase "all priests", as if all Catholic priests were of the Latin Church.
Dn. Robert
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268 |
Originally posted by Jessup B.C. Deacon: I subscribe to Catholic World News, and think it's a fine publication. But, take notice of the phrase "all priests", as if [b]all Catholic priests were of the Latin Church.
Dn. Robert [/b] That should be understood naturally as referring only to all Latin Rite priests as "Ecclesia Dei" was issued and pertains exclusively to the Latin Church. And the celebration of the TLM is limited only in the Latin Church. Amado
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390 |
Question: This right is being given to the priests instead of the bishops. It has been a point of contention in some areas that the bishop does not want a TLM. This would allow a priest to act against the wishes of the bishop? That doesn't make sense to me.
Also, what of the priest who will insist on its use even though his parishioners do not want it? Will they have any recourse? The church isn't democratic, so they can't take a vote. The obvious answer is to contact the bishop, but will the bishop be able to override the priest's inherent right to say the TLM whenever and wherever he wishes?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 95
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 95 |
The disturbing part is that The Roman Bishops STILL may forbid it in their Diocese - I cannot understand how this will be any different at this time. As a Latin [Indult] Catholic, (who is more and more drawn to the EC), where collegiality lives, nothing will change, even from the pen of the Pope. There is also a difference between having a Latin Mass said as a 'service provided' to those Una Voce or other groups of people, as opposed to a true parish which fosters the faith and sacraments that are integral with The Latin Mass through parish life. It is NOT merely a matter of language; there are major differences in catechism, at least the ones they use in the classrooms, theology, and many practices not permitted before Vatican II. (Eucharist in the hand, and more) The Mass, or Divine Liturgy, for that matter, is worshipping the way we believe - "Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi" It will still be problematic. IMHO, I think it is only meant to absorb the schismatics. Then what??? We all need many prayers, East and West, since we Catholics (not to exclude you, dear brothers and sisters of the Orthodox Faith) all are under The Pope of Rome. MANY, MANY, MANY prayers are still needed regarding this matter. I refer ONLY to the freeing up of The Latin Indult. I hope no one takes offense; no offense is intended. Many years! - Gv.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Jessup B.C. Deacon Member
|
Jessup B.C. Deacon Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346 |
Originally posted by Amadeus: Originally posted by Jessup B.C. Deacon: [b] I subscribe to Catholic World News, and think it's a fine publication. But, take notice of the phrase "all priests", as if [b]all Catholic priests were of the Latin Church.
Dn. Robert [/b] That should be understood naturally as referring only to all Latin Rite priests as "Ecclesia Dei" was issued and pertains exclusively to the Latin Church.
And the celebration of the TLM is limited only in the Latin Church.
Amado [/b]Dear Amado, Correct you are. However, a lot of Catholic journals act as if Catholic Eastern Churches do not exist, or are an aberrational "blip" on the screen. The above piece is one example of that. Another example of this ignorance or neglect occurs when the debate on women's ordination is brought up. Usually, the progressivist/liberal "Catholic" journals, without making distinctions between categories, will lump together the idea of "women priests, and married priests". Then, in response, also without making any distinctions, the "orthodox/conservative" journals will respond, negatively, on the issue of "women priests,and married priests". While the "progressivists" rarely make a distinction between what is ontological (i.e., only a male human can be ordained to Holy Orders), and what is disciplinary (i.e., whether or not one's discipline allows for married men to be ordained to priesthood-this is NOT an ontological question), one would think that the "orthodox" R.C.'s would know enough to make such distinctions. Yet, they do not bother to do so. Many will acknowledge that there are married priests in the Catholic East, but will treat it as something odd. This is an indirect show of disrespect to the Catholic Eastern Churches, which have always allowed for the ordination of married men to the priesthood (with the sole exception of the Syro-Malabar Church, which requires celibacy). The people at Catholic World News are fully aware of the existence of Catholic Eastern Churches, and frequently have feature articles on them, and yet pieces like the one above on the Gregorian Mass still continue to appear. Dn. Robert
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Jessup B.C. Deacon Member
|
Jessup B.C. Deacon Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346 |
On the issue of the "freeing up" of the Gregorian Mass (this is how we should refer to it, because it's authorship is attributed to St. Gregory Dialogos (the Great)), as a former RC with a Traditonalist bent, I think this is good news, at least for now. However, I agree, ultimately, with my 82 year-old father who feels that the Traditional Roman Mass should be translated into the vernacular (without any help from Bishop Trautman, thank you  ) , and, it should be THE Mass of the Roman Rite, with celebrations in Latin also being done, somewhat like we do in the East, vis a vis the use of the vernacular, along with Slavonic, or Greek. This, of course, would entail suppression of the Novus Ordo Missae, which, I do not think would cause many on this message board to shed tears! Dn. Robert
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268 |
I believe it should be made clear that the universal liturgy in the Roman Church is still the Missale Romano, which today is the Novus Ordo.
The original language of the Novus Ordo is in Latin but is amenable to translation into the languages of the people. French in French- speaking countries, Spanish in Spanish-speaking countries, English in English-speaking countries, and so on and so forth.
The radical change would be on whose authority the granting of indults for the celebration of the TLM is lodged.
"Ecclesia Dei" lodged this specific authority on the local ordinaries. Now, it is being contemplated to delimit that authority by a "universal indult" granted by the Pope to all Latin rite priests who are trained and educated on the Tridentine mass. Untrained Latin rite priests have to undergo "re-training" if they wish to celebrate the TLM.
Of course, enough parishoners have to signify their preference for the TLM in any of the scheduled Sunday Masses and if there is a priest in that particular parish trained to celebrate the TLM properly.
I think this change will not be implemented overnight. There will be a learning curve.
Amado
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390 |
Amado,
I have not followed this at all. Are you saying that the point is to give the power to the priests and to remove it from the bishops? I can't square that away with the role of a priest regarding the authority of the bishop. Is there something I'm missing?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268 |
Originally posted by Wondering: Amado,
I have not followed this at all. Are you saying that the point is to give the power to the priests and to remove it from the bishops? I can't square that away with the role of a priest regarding the authority of the bishop. Is there something I'm missing? No, I am not saying that. The power transfer is from the local Bishop to the Pope, by a universal indult under his authority. That means a Latin rite priest need not go to his Bishop anymore for him to celebrate the TLM if circumstances warrant. The indult to celebrate will become universal and permanent, until the Pope (or his successor) withdraws it. Motu proprio (by his own supreme authority), Pope Benedict XVI may completely abrogate the "Ecclesia Dei" and the Commission administering it or he may revise or amend it to conform to the intended "universal indult" being contemplated. The Pope is the supreme Bishop of the entire Catholic Church. Amado
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390 |
Amado,
Thanks. That makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,528
Grateful Member
|
Grateful Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,528 |
Originally posted by Wondering: [b]Question: This right is being given to the priests instead of the bishops. It has been a point of contention in some areas that the bishop does not want a TLM. This would allow a priest to act against the wishes of the bishop? That doesn't make sense to me.
Also, what of the priest who will insist on its use even though his parishioners do not want it? Will they have any recourse? The church isn't democratic, so they can't take a vote. The obvious answer is to contact the bishop, but will the bishop be able to override the priest's inherent right to say the TLM whenever and wherever he wishes? [/b] Those are two very good questions. -- John
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,268 |
If Pope Benedict XVI eliminates the Ecclesia Dei Commission, the universal indult directive will be addressed to all national epsicopal conferences, which would then come up with appropriate rules governing its implementation.
Otherwise, if the EDC will be retained, the Commission will come up with new rules and instructions for reference by individual national episcopal conferences.
Amado
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,528
Grateful Member
|
Grateful Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,528 |
Here is the story from Catholic News Service. http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0605776.htm Vatican source says pope to expand use of Tridentine Mass
By John Thavis Catholic News Service
VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Pope Benedict XVI is preparing to expand permission to use the Tridentine Mass, the pre-Vatican II rite favored by traditionalist groups, said an informed Vatican source.
The pope is expected to issue a document "motu proprio," or on his own initiative, which will address the concerns of "various traditionalists," said the source, who asked not to be named.
The source said the new permission, or indult, was a papal decision, but was being done in cooperation with agencies of the Roman Curia. He would not elaborate on the extent of the indult, when it would be established or how it would work.
The Tridentine rite is currently available to groups of Catholics who ask and receive permission for its use from their local bishops. The old rite is celebrated in Latin and follows the Roman Missal of 1962, which was replaced in 1969 with the new Roman Missal.
Among those who have strongly pushed for wider use of the Tridentine rite are the followers of the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who was excommunicated in 1988.
Canadian Archbishop James Weisgerber of Winnipeg, Manitoba, told Catholic News Service Oct. 10 that Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, head of the Congregation for Clergy, had spoken briefly to Canadian bishops about the expected step.
"It sounded to me like it was a sort of concession somebody has made," the archbishop said.
Archbishop Weisgerber said the new indult was apparently motivated by a desire to bring comfort to older people who may miss the old rite. But in his archdiocese, he said, the few people asking for it are "young people who never experienced it."
Pope Benedict has made new efforts to reconcile with leaders of the Lefebvrite religious order, the Society of St. Pius X. In a meeting last year with the pope, Bishop Bernard Fellay, head of the society, asked for the restoration of the Tridentine rite as a sign of good will.
Bishop Fellay later told CNS that he thought the Vatican should simply declare that the Tridentine rite can be used freely because it was never really abrogated. Bishop Fellay also said wider use of the Tridentine Mass would not solve all the problems the Lefebvrites have with the Second Vatican Council.
The pope discussed potential reconciliation terms with the Lefebvrites in two meetings earlier this year, one with heads of Vatican curial offices and one with the world's cardinals. In both meetings, sources said, there were mixed views on wider use of the Tridentine Mass.
In 1984, Pope John Paul II first made it possible for groups of the faithful to worship according to the old rite under certain conditions. In 1991, the Vatican established more liberal guidelines, encouraging bishops to grant permission and retaining just one basic condition: that those seeking the old Mass form must also accept the validity of the new rite.
Pope Benedict has long questioned the wisdom of the liturgical changes made after the Second Vatican Council. As Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, he was sometimes outspoken about what he considered the dismantling of the church's liturgical tradition.
"I was dismayed by the ban on the old missal, since such a development had never been seen in the history of liturgy. The impression was given that this was completely normal," he wrote in a 1997 book.
In the same book, he said it was important for the faithful to understand that for liturgy and other areas, Vatican II was not a break but a "developing moment."
END
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678 |
Wondering,
Well, the idea is that the bishop does not actually have the right to forbid his priests to use the TLM in favor of the NO for any reason other than that the priest is not sufficiently familiar with the TLM and would botch it up.
Now, this is all conjecture, but from what I've heard this ________ (whatever it is; motu propio, apostolic exhoration, etc.) permits the bishop to forbid a priest to celebrate the TLM if he puts it in writing and sends an official letter to the priest. Presumably, the only reason for this would be that priests who cannot say the TLM correctly, and this is obvious to the bishop, could be barred (temporarily?) from celebrating the Traditional Mass.
Not that I underestimate many bishops' hatred of the TLM, such as many of the bishops in France (and let's face it, about everywhere else!), but for a bishop to take the time to expressly forbid the TLM to every/many of the priests in his diocese would so clearly show his hand and his real motivationn, i.e. a hatred of the TLM instead of a desire to protect it from abuse, that I would surmise higher authorities would get involved...
*NOTHING IS CERTAIN YET. We basically don't know anything until words come from the Holy Father himself and not a minute before.
I would suggest that everyone who is able, pray a Rosary or an Akathist to Our Lady, as much as possible during the next few days and weeks.
Logos Teen
|
|
|
|
|