The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Regf2, SomeInquirer, Wee Shuggie, Bodhi Zaffa, anaxios2022
5,881 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (1 invisible), 287 guests, and 26 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,219
Posts415,299
Members5,881
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,716
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,716
Remie,

This was attempted not long ago (intercommunion of Churches between the Melkites
and the Antiochian Orthodox) and I believe there was pressure from both Rome and Antioch for this to be dropped. Again, around the issue of the Papal Claims etc
Someone else on the board could probably fill in the details of this.

Peace,
Brian

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 228
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 228
Orthodox Catholic, you said that the Byzantine marriage bonds occur after death. What about Matt. 22:30, "in the resurrection there is neither marrying or giving in marriage, but are like the angels." Don't this rule out the possibility of there being marriage for eternity?

P.S. If a man gets married after his wife dies will he have more than one wife for eternity? hehe. Thanks.


Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory Forever!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 228
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 228
(not occurs after death. I meant lasts until after death.) smile


Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory Forever!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 564
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 564
Dear Brian and Remie,
Unfortunately, I don't have the details, but rumor says that some officials at the Vatican weren't very keen on the idea, but than again this is rumor. That's why I guess, Gregory the III is asking for Greek Catholics to unite (Slovaks, Romanians, Rusyns, Hungarians, Ukies, etc.) I think he's got something up his sleeve.
Lauro

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Theosis,

Yes, we mean spiritual bond that persists after death, very much, although not exactly like, when the priestly character lasts for all eternity.

A novel I once read described a couple where the woman was very religious but her husband not at all.

Their little girl would say prayers out of her prayerbook for her father's conversion - and this standing over his bed - and then would bend down to look into his eyes and see if there was any noticeable change in him . . .

One Sunday, on her way to Mass, the man's wife turned to him and told him God would find a way to bring him to heaven after all.

"Because if you aren't there, it just won't be 'heaven!'"

Alex

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 228
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 228
Thanks, Alex! But what about the person who has been married after the death of the first spouse? Do those other bonds last also? If so, how? Thanks!


Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory Forever!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,317
Likes: 21
Dear Theosis,

I'm sure that spiritual bonds between married people continue to exist, even when someone has been married more than once!

Why shouldn't they?

Again, we're not talking sex - not in the next life when people are calm and resting wink .

It is like the bonds existing between brothers and sisters.

St Thomas More was married twice.

I visited the reconstructed Church (bombed in WWII) where he spent every Friday and Sunday attending services.

His two wives are buried in the same tomb there and a poem he wrote to both of them is engraved in stone.

(Of course, when he wrote it, his second wife was still alive as she outlived him following his martyrdom).

His poem is beautiful and he talks about how he loves both his wives equally, not knowing whom he loves best - and remember that he was then speaking of his first, by then, deceased wife.

And he ends with the wish to spend heaven in the company of both.

Alex

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 228
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 228
smile Thanks, Alex. I had quesiton on the concept of "theosis" now. Since theosis is partaking of the Lord's "divine energies not his essence" would that mean we would get to create worlds like he does, and work miracles, etc? Do all the things God does with God working through us instead of us being God be nature. Thanks!


Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory Forever!
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
L
Member
Offline
Member
L
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678
That sounds like Mormonism to me! I mean us becoming gods and rulin' our own little mini-universes.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,075
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,075
Quote
Originally posted by ChristTeen287:
That sounds like Mormonism to me! I mean us becoming gods and rulin' our own little mini-universes.
You're right that what the above poster posted was Mormon-sounding.

Theosis means we become divine by GRACE (ie we are still humans, but filled 100% with God) while God is God by NATURE (he cannot cease being God).

St. Gregory Palamas was the one who most clearly explained the difference between God's essence (what he is in himself; his nature) and his energies (grace; God going outside of himself and acting in the universe). Essence is unknowable becuase God is transcendent. Energy is knowable. Both are God. Without the distinction, we could not truly become one with God.

In Christ,

anastasios

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 221
Z
Member
Offline
Member
Z
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 221
Quote
Without the distinction, we could not truly become one with God.
Extremely debatable. A problematic theology in many ways. St. Gregory Palamas, like most theologians however wise, did not possess the charism of infallibility. Palamism is not dogma, however much it may be presented as such nowadays. :p

God is simple. There is no plurality in God except the Trinity. My 2 cents' worth, fwiw.

biggrin

ZT

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 787
E
Member
Offline
Member
E
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 787
CIX!

Quote
Palamism is not dogma, however much it may be presented as such nowadays. :p [/QB]
An Oecumenical council declared and affirmed it, that is enough for me! :p

in Domino,

Edward

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
P
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
P
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Don I am anxious to hear the rest of the story.
Pat :rolleyes:

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 405
M
Member
Offline
Member
M
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 405
Quote
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic:


The Latin Church's form of annulment has become quite the farce, at least in North America.

Bishops tend to rely on psychological assessments in determining whether to grant an annulment or not. Then an "annulment" is granted that states that the marriage bond never existed in the first place? Is this not only nonsensical but against the spirit of the Gospel and of historic Catholic moral theology?

Alex
OC,

Your first paragraph I'm not sure I know what it implies? But I'm a firm supporter of the Bishops granting annulments to couples who's marriages are in a state of turmoil. I don't understand this modern western concept of "getting married" till we no longer desire to be married. But nor do I see the health in couples staying married who are at each others throats.

The story is often told about kids who don't want their parents to divorce. Hmm. Their is another story out there less told if ever - kids (children not adults) that wish for their parents to divorce. My word doesn't have to be taken on it though - you can ask my brother.

As for your second paragraph, I too have raised the "nonsensical(ness)" of Catholic concept of "annulments." How can the Catholic Church report where a marriage lies, if it in essence doesn't know?

Justin

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5