Sekstanstvo (Sectarian) Bodies - The Eretiki (Heretics) (#4 of 5) - 07/14/08 01:16 AM
Sekstanstvo (Sectarians) were bodies which either lacked elements consistent with the espoused doctrinal precepts of the Old Believers or adopted theology and praxis that was so at odds with it that they could not reasonably be construed as having maintained valid ties to it or Orthodoxy.
Although often generically labeled as Bespopovtsy, the majority are really so distinct that they merit separate classification from the Bespopovtsy and would have been rejected by them. Collectively, I've used the term to encompass what were generally described as Eretiki (Heretics), and as Dukhovnye Khristiane (Spiritual Christians).
They span a continuum of belief and praxis from being theologically 'eccentric' to true extremism. The category also includes movements characterized, as much or more, by philosophical and/or social rather than theological constructs and others which represented a resurrection of heresies from earlier eras.
Considerations that contributed to and drove the rise of Sekstanstvo can probably be said to include:
It is possible that what have come down to us as defining characteristics of various sects were, in at least some instances, the perceived pious (or impious) praxis of individuals or small groups, rather than being truly representative of an organized ecclesiastical entity with distinctive theology and/or praxis. So, 'sect', as used here, should not be construed as necessarily defining a structured body. I've employed it to denote any distinct group derived from the constellation of Old Believers (and some that arose contemporaneous with but not from within the Old Believer movement), whether formally organized or informally united by belief or praxis.
Although often generically labeled as Bespopovtsy, the majority are really so distinct that they merit separate classification from the Bespopovtsy and would have been rejected by them. Collectively, I've used the term to encompass what were generally described as Eretiki (Heretics), and as Dukhovnye Khristiane (Spiritual Christians).
They span a continuum of belief and praxis from being theologically 'eccentric' to true extremism. The category also includes movements characterized, as much or more, by philosophical and/or social rather than theological constructs and others which represented a resurrection of heresies from earlier eras.
Considerations that contributed to and drove the rise of Sekstanstvo can probably be said to include:
- Adaptation to circumstances
- Despair
- Extremism (under guise of religious fervor)
- Fanaticism
- Fear
- Persecution
- Personality conflicts
- Philosophical beliefs
- Pious practices
- Populist sentiments
- Practical considerations
- Rebelliousness
- Secularism
- Self-aggrandizement
- Superstition
- Zealotry
It is possible that what have come down to us as defining characteristics of various sects were, in at least some instances, the perceived pious (or impious) praxis of individuals or small groups, rather than being truly representative of an organized ecclesiastical entity with distinctive theology and/or praxis. So, 'sect', as used here, should not be construed as necessarily defining a structured body. I've employed it to denote any distinct group derived from the constellation of Old Believers (and some that arose contemporaneous with but not from within the Old Believer movement), whether formally organized or informally united by belief or praxis.