0 members (),
571
guests, and
92
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,540
Posts417,759
Members6,193
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 107
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 107 |
It is right that there was nothing lacking in Christ, otherwise He could not be Christ. I think this is a start to understand "lacking" But when it is added that "lacking in Christ's afflictions," then there could be implied that the sufferings of the Church is what was lacking. This is also good. It was for the Church that Christ suffered, so as Paul is suffering for Christ, he is contributing to Christ's work through his own "afflictions for the sake of His body". This is good too But why refer to what is lacking in Christ's suffering? BTW This was the first reading in the Latin church yesterday Monday 9/10/2007 but the short sermon was on the Gospel.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 107
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 107 |
In his sermons, Augustine mentions the passage again, that Paul is "thus showing that what he was suffering was part and parcel of the afflictions of Christ. This is very good. What is so important about our suffering that we can say that Christ's suffering lacks something? I might have it from what you all have said. Perhaps Paul is talking about the mystical body of Christ and the physical body of Christ at the same time. The "lacking" was not in the physical body of Christ but the mystical body of Christ and Christ is the head and we (the church) are the rest of the body which needs to suffer along with the head.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214 |
It may not be possible to understand "why" the word lacking was used. Modern commentators may claim to have percise understandings, but then their speculation can be so grounded in the speculation of their peers that their confidence blinds the mystery.
In many places Paul uses words to incite action among his readers. Perhaps he wanted to stress this "call to action" in the personal and social lives of the people of Colosse. It may tie in with a theme in Colossians: "If then you have been raised with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Set your minds on things that are above, not on things that are on earth. For you have died, and your life is hid with Christ in God."
Setting our minds above this world requires suffering. It's not easy, and sometimes it requires courage. And when that's required, though Paul did not pursue martyrdom and that is not what I mean with required, it may help a believer to see how needful Christ's mission is as they continue it with their faith and lives.
I cannot grasp the answer, I can only frame it within the spirit of Scripture.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,370 Likes: 104
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,370 Likes: 104 |
I might have it from what you all have said. Perhaps Paul is talking about the mystical body of Christ and the physical body of Christ at the same time. The "lacking" was not in the physical body of Christ but the mystical body of Christ and Christ is the head and we (the church) are the rest of the body which needs to suffer along with the head. melkiteman: I think you're coming to it, as you say. I detect some of the legalistic approach of the West in your attempts to understand this Mystery. The physical body of Christ is also part of the Mystical Body of Christ so there is an overlap here that allows us who are baptised to be part of the sufferings of Christ Himself and gives our own suffering an eternal value. The whole question of why men suffer in this life is one that has had every civilization and religion trying to come up with an answer. And they all have fallen short until the advent of Christ and the Revelation He brought. I think if you read through this whole thread again and pray about it, you will come to the Church's understanding. It might help if we think of Christ not only taking on the sin of all mankind, but also taking on Himself all of the suffering of those who were His own and who would become His own in the future--that's us--as He suffered on the Cross, as well as all the suffering of every human being ever created. Part of the problem in the English-speaking world, as I see it, is that we are so heavily influenced by Protestant approaches to Scripture and the literal understanding that comes from fundamentalism. You may also have heard it said that the work of Christ on the Cross is finished and nothing needs to be added to it, even though St. Paul's words appear in the same Scripture they use. So it seems we have to trust the Church for a complete explanation of the Mystery in such persons as St. John Chrysostom mentioned above. In Christ, BOB
Last edited by theophan; 09/12/07 08:05 AM.
|
|
|
|
|