1 members (Roman),
585
guests, and
98
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,530
Posts417,670
Members6,182
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 438
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 438 |
Orthodox in Communion with Rome is an accurate construct for the Byzantine Catholic Churches.
Yes
No
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 347
尼古拉前执事 Member
|
尼古拉前执事 Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 347 |
Glory to Jesus Christ!
How can one be "Orthodox in Communion with Rome" if one isn't in communion with Orthodoxy? "Orthodox not in communion with Orthodoxy" is an oxymoron, no? Just some thoughts. God Bless!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788 |
I can accept it as a contruct; I would question it as a name.
Axios
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,771 Likes: 30
John Member
|
John Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,771 Likes: 30 |
Nik,
Communion with the Successor of Peter is the crown of Orthodoxy. This is something most Orthodox are lacking.
Admin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,698
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,698 |
When I went to vote, I saw this as the "No" choice:
"No, this does not reflect the status of the BC churches"
Seeing the choices, I had to vote no. Of course, one could easily say that since I have virtually no experience with the BC Churches, I may not know what I'm talking about. But from all I've read, and all I've learned here, I don't think one can say that the status of the BC Churches is "Orthodox in Communion with Rome".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 522
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 522 |
I voted yes, makes perfect sense to me! Don
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,678 Likes: 1 |
I voted no, for similar reasons as Nik. However, I see it redundant: it's like saying "Orthodoxy in communion with Orthodoxy" (Catholicism being Orthodoxy, obviously). To say "Orthodox in Communion with Rome" implies that Rome is unorthodox, and from the Byzantine Catholic perspective, and every Catholic perspective for that matter, Rome is orthodox.
ChristTeen287
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1 |
"Crown of Orthodoxy" I don't necessarily agree with, Administrator. The crown of orthodoxy resides with all bishops who profess the orthodox catholic faith.
What I would say is that communion with the successor of Peter makes us and the Church truly "catholic" (in the universal sense).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,461 Likes: 1 |
Can I vote "yes" three times? (Ukie thing) 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 522
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 522 |
yes, Subdeacon Randolph, one time for each Person of the Trinity  What can I say..its a Ukie thing or so I have been told. Right Alex?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,191 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,191 Likes: 3 |
Will miracles never cease, Don from Kansas and I agree on something. Glory to Jesus Christ.
Dan Lauffer
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,191 Likes: 3
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,191 Likes: 3 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,716
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,716 |
I was never comfortable using this tern as a Byzantine Catholic and I tend to agree with a friend's position that it can be as offensive to the Orthodox as "Uniate" is offensive to Eastern Catholics though of course, not as perjorative. There does have to be Communion with the Orthodox to really be Orthodox. I came to that realization after many years.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,941 |
"Orthodox not in communion with Orthodoxy" is an oxymoron There does have to be Communion with the Orthodox to really be Orthodox Not really. After all, Eastern Orthodox have not been in communion with Oriental Orthodox for some time. Moreover, even within canonical Eastern Orthodoxy there are certain juridictions that are not in communion with others.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,964 |
Dear Friends,
I voted no. I have not thought of myself as "Orthodox" for even one day of my life.
But my faith in Christ's One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church has always been. I just wish the Hierarchs would stop bickering over turf and firing canons.
I have no issues regarding validity or merits of the Orthodox Churches, but I respect their claim to the title "Orthodox" and never use it myself.
Have a Blessed Day !!!
John Pilgrim and Odd Duck
|
|
|
|
|