Jay Alexander. His book on Catherine (published by Oxford) is probably the best I have read.
Sorry, I have never read this book and am not familiar with the scholar. I will have to look for it. Which university does he teach at?
It is importat to cite scholarly books by recognised and established scholars who read Russian. Church Slavonic and document everything.
There are always books out there written for popular consumption such as
Catherine the Great by Henri Troyat, ( Joan Pinkham Translator from the French).
This is not a history book but a popular biography with generalizations, rumours, innuendo errors and of course no footnotes or Russian primary sources to verify statements.
Let me just give you some miscontrued statements from this book:
Page 153
Discussing the coronation ceremony with the Archbishop of Novgorod
In Uspensky Cathedral in the Kremlin, Moscow.
“Seated on her throne, motionless and hierarchical, ... the Archbishop of Novgorod gave her the holy unction. Now having become head of the Orthodox Church, she herself celebrated mass at the altar.
Page 157 refers to Catherine as the “temporal head of the Orthodox Church.”
Page 249 the authors refer to the Emperor Peter as the “ Head of the Greek Orthodox Church”
Page 349. “She conducted herself as head of the Orthodox Church.”
Of course we know that it is Christ who is head of the Orthodox Church according to Orthodox tradition. Perhaps the author was thinking of Queen Elizabeth 1 of England and the English tradition of the monarch with the Church of England, the Anglican Church.
But to get back to the topic: if the Empress Catherine did receive communion behind the iconostasis, does this also mean that the Empress Sophia also was granted that right?
I'd be interested as well - it is my understanding from histories of Kyivan Rus' that Princess Olha and the subsequent princesses before the Muscovite era had an appointed place near the iconostas but outside the altar on the left (north) side.
Thanks for that info Diak. Is that recorded in the Primary Chronicle?
I know for example, in Bukovyna when it was under Moldavia, (after 1400) the Royal Family (Hospodar) stood closest to the iconostasis. If you visit the monasteries in Bukovyna, you can find 3 roomed churches and the royal family only were allowed in the first part, the nobility in the second part and the rest of us poor peasants in the third part.