The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Augoustinos, Poliscifi, The Cub, P H, Hardrada
5604 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 64 guests, and 449 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Church of the Holy Trinity (UGCC) - Brazil
Papal Audience 10 November 2017
Upgraded Russian icon corner
Russian Greek Catholic Global Congress
OL EuroEast II (2007) Group
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics34,747
Posts412,017
Members5,604
Most Online2,716
Jun 7th, 2012
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 12 13
Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: BenjaminRH] #394356 05/16/13 08:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Peter J Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Originally Posted by BenjaminRH
Is it not the mission of the sui iuris Eastern churches to disappear?

Perhaps, perhaps not. What's more important for me is that it isn't our mission to get Orthodox to switch sides:

Quote
Pastoral activity in the Catholic Church, Latin as well as Eastern, no longer aims at having the faithful of one Church pass over to the other

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: Peter J] #394365 05/16/13 11:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
IAlmisry Offline
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Christ is risen!
Originally Posted by Peter J
Originally Posted by BenjaminRH
Is it not the mission of the sui iuris Eastern churches to disappear?

Perhaps, perhaps not. What's more important for me is that it isn't our mission to get Orthodox to switch sides:

Quote
Pastoral activity in the Catholic Church, Latin as well as Eastern, no longer aims at having the faithful of one Church pass over to the other

and whom are you quoting?

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: BenjaminRH] #394366 05/17/13 12:00 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
IAlmisry Offline
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Christ is risen!
Originally Posted by BenjaminRH
Some questions, as someone sitting on the fence between Orthodoxy and Catholicism:

1. If Rome was always Supreme, did the early Bishops of Rome appoint the bishops of other dioceses?

2. Why were early councils called by and presided over other bishops (such as the Council of Jerusalem), instead of the Bishop/Pope of Rome? Why did emperors like Constantine convene councils, instead of the Roman Pope?

1. No. They did try on occasion, but were rebuffed.
2. I'll someone who subscribes to Pastor Aeternus try to answer this one.

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: IAlmisry] #394371 05/17/13 08:26 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Peter J Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Christ is risen!
Originally Posted by Peter J
Originally Posted by BenjaminRH
Is it not the mission of the sui iuris Eastern churches to disappear?

Perhaps, perhaps not. What's more important for me is that it isn't our mission to get Orthodox to switch sides:

Quote
Pastoral activity in the Catholic Church, Latin as well as Eastern, no longer aims at having the faithful of one Church pass over to the other

and whom are you quoting?


Good point. I meant to say that's from the Balamand Statement.

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: Peter J] #394374 05/17/13 10:24 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 167
B
BenjaminRH Offline
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 167
I agree Peter; the difference between the Orthodox and Rome is not similar to that of Baptists and Rome. Baptists, Mormons, etc. must actually come over to the one Church of Christ.

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: Peter J] #394382 05/17/13 02:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
IAlmisry Offline
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by Peter J
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Christ is risen!
Originally Posted by Peter J
Originally Posted by BenjaminRH
Is it not the mission of the sui iuris Eastern churches to disappear?

Perhaps, perhaps not. What's more important for me is that it isn't our mission to get Orthodox to switch sides:

Quote
Pastoral activity in the Catholic Church, Latin as well as Eastern, no longer aims at having the faithful of one Church pass over to the other

and whom are you quoting?


Good point. I meant to say that's from the Balamand Statement.

'Nuf said.

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: IAlmisry] #394386 05/17/13 04:36 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Peter J Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by Peter J
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Christ is risen!
Originally Posted by Peter J
Perhaps, perhaps not. What's more important for me is that it isn't our mission to get Orthodox to switch sides:

Pastoral activity in the Catholic Church, Latin as well as Eastern, no longer aims at having the faithful of one Church pass over to the other
and whom are you quoting?
Good point. I meant to say that's from the Balamand Statement.
'Nuf said.


Thanks smile I try.

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: Peter J] #394392 05/17/13 08:19 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 318
desertman Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 318
I just happened to notice that Fr. Taft's interview has now been published at pravoslavie.ru. They seem to have also edited out his comments on Orthodox traditionalists.

http://www.pravoslavie.ru/english/61580.htm


Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: Jaya] #394401 05/18/13 07:47 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
T
The young fogey Offline
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
Catholicism and Orthodoxy: relativistic crap ecumenism.

Branch-theory nonsense, or no wonder 'ecumenist' is a fightin' word among online Orthodox.

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: The young fogey] #394402 05/18/13 08:47 AM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 209
E
eastwardlean? Offline
Member
Offline
Member
E
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 209
Originally Posted by The young fogey
Catholicism and Orthodoxy: relativistic crap ecumenism.

Branch-theory nonsense, or no wonder 'ecumenist' is a fightin' word among online Orthodox.


If Taft's views represent branch-theory nonsense, then I must say that the 'branch-theory' really is nonsense, that is it is meaningless as a descriptive or diagnostic term.

I do not mean to deny the danger of relativism, nor to embrace it myself, but this term is thrown around so indiscriminately that it sometimes seems to rule out any attempt to work for unity among divided Christians as relativism.


Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: The young fogey] #394405 05/18/13 11:56 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431
Peter J Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,431

To be fair, I think it's an improvement over the Union of Brest. As a matter of fact, it's what the Union of Brest was going to be, supposedly.

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: Jaya] #394406 05/18/13 01:31 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
S
StuartK Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Sergei long ago became reflexively reactionary, which is a shame. The world has quite enough Father Vasily Vasileviches as it is, and not nearly enough people who venerate Tradition as the living faith of the dead. The difference between Taft and his critics is Taft knows the history of the division, and thus has been liberated from the stultifying polemics of the past thousand years.

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: BenjaminRH] #394410 05/18/13 01:43 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,759
Paul B Offline
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,759
Originally Posted by BenjaminRH
Is it not the mission of the sui iuris Eastern churches to disappear? I don't mean that rudely, but won't the Eastern Catholic Churches "melt" into the Orthodox Church when there is true unity again?


Eventually, God willing, there will be no Eastern Catholic Churches which are out of Communion with the Eastern Orthodox Churches. But we aren't close to that point. It would be cruel and unwise to make them pawns; liquidation of the EC at this time should not be a discussion topic. The Communists tried liquidation and failed.

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: Paul B] #394412 05/18/13 03:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
IAlmisry Offline
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by Paul B
Originally Posted by BenjaminRH
Is it not the mission of the sui iuris Eastern churches to disappear? I don't mean that rudely, but won't the Eastern Catholic Churches "melt" into the Orthodox Church when there is true unity again?


Eventually, God willing, there will be no Eastern Catholic Churches which are out of Communion with the Eastern Orthodox Churches. But we aren't close to that point. It would be cruel and unwise to make them pawns; liquidation of the EC at this time should not be a discussion topic. The Communists tried liquidation and failed.
oh? any more than the various "unions" failed for Old Rome to liquidate the Orthodox?

Re: Recent interview with Fr. Taft [Re: Jaya] #394413 05/18/13 05:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
S
StuartK Offline
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
It must be good to be able to wallow in one's own rectitude.

Page 3 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 12 13

The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2019 (Forum 1998-2019). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3