Dear Dr Eric,
Sundays are the traditional days for the celebration of ALL the major Mysteries/Sacraments including Baptisms/Chrismations, ordinations/consecrations, and Crownings/weddings.
The reason my in-laws gave for why we had to get married on a Saturday was . . . drinking by-laws . . .
I'm attending a wedding this weekend where there will be a short service Saturday afternoon (so people wouldn't have to go home but could move to the reception right after). The bride and groom have been living together for a while now so I guess the service is a kind of "supplicatory canon of relief" for the parents (?).
The way EC's in my orbit have come to celebrate "weddings" is truly NOT in keeping with our beautiful traditions - in fact, it is the crassest form of Westernization.
The Mystery of Crowning (if it is even called that any more) is done outside the context of the Divine Liturgy as a separate service, on Saturdays, with a number of traditions dropped and with many wearing their wedding rings on their left hand (the reason given is that everyone wears their rings on their left hand as a kind of "insurance" or signal to others of the opposite sex that they are married and "off limits." Personally, I think that is nonsense - there are those who think that affairs with married people are "safe" etc.!).
To have the Crowning service in conjunction with the Divine Liturgy is to truly bring Christ into a marriage as the third and most important "Partner" of all!
Yes, it takes a little longer. As our parish priest used to say, "But no one ever suggests shortening the reception afterwards!"
To hold it on Sundays is to underscore the high spiritual calling of those entering into the married state as well.
And then we complain when a deluge of divorce hits our younger generation! Go figure!
We've secularized marriage so much that the "Churchy" portion becomes almost like an "add-on" that might even be possibly dispensed with and, if it were, wouldn't change much about the wedding day.
Our priests and parents especially need to spend more time discussing these traditions with the younger generationas the real tools of evangelization that they are. They are not merely outward symbols.
I am currently working on an outline for this year's fall religion course and this topic is front and centre beginning in September!
I'm even going to have a "re-enactment" at the front of the auditorium with a boy and a girl in a mock marriage ceremony. They will be asked questions by others who are visitors to the event and the onus will be on them to explain the liturgical and other traditions . . .
Is that cool or what?
What do you think, Professor Dan?
Alex