0 members (),
389
guests, and
134
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,542
Posts417,786
Members6,196
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 322 Likes: 5
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 322 Likes: 5 |
Hello all! I have a few questions regarding baptism in the Eastern Churches. In the West, at least, any baptised person can baptize another. In case of emergency of course, but the important point is that they can. Is this also true in the East? If not, then how would the Eastern Catholic Churches and Orthodox Churches view a baptism performed by a lay person? Would they consider it null?
If it is possible, then, if it happened in the East the person baptized in such a case would not be communed and chrismed, for obvious reasons. In case the person/baby survived the situation he or she was in, would these sacraments be administered seperately as soon as possible?
God bless, Filipe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38 |
Dear Filipe,
Any baptized person in the East can and should administer Baptism in emergencies - and that baptism is valid, of course.
The Greeks also allow "aero-baptism" or lifting a child in danger of dying into the air three times while pronouncing the words - I don't know much about this rite.
My cousin was adopted and she did have a baptismal certificate.
The other two Mysteries of Initiation were administered to her at the same time and by my grandfather, Fr. John ( + memory eternal!).
Alex
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 22
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 22 |
OC, I know you said you don't know much about the rite, but do you have anywhere where I could find some reading on the "aero-baptism" of which you speak? I have never heard of it before, and I must say I am skeptical, though not in a condescending or malicious way - I have an open mind, I've just never heard of something like that before. Thanks a ton, and God Bless!
Yours In Christ,
Jeff
fides quaerens intellectum
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 322 Likes: 5
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 322 Likes: 5 |
Hello, The Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Church's website includes the following explanation about aero-baptism: "If no Orthodox is available, the doctor or nurse, preferably Christian, can do the aero-baptism." ( http://www.goholytrinity.org/sacramental/sacramental4.php) Preferably Christian????!!!!!! So what, if there are no christians around, somebody else can baptize the baby? Now this is something I have NEVER heard of! Any comments?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405 Likes: 38 |
Dear Filipe, Yes, in your RC Church, non-Christians may baptize if there is no Christian present and it is the will of the person to be baptized AND if the non-Christian doing the baptizing will baptize according to the form and spirit etc. That goes on in your RC Church! Pax Tecum! Alex
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 322 Likes: 5
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 322 Likes: 5 |
Well, we learn things everyday! That was a surprise, thanks OC! Filipe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390 |
Found this online in a chat. Not much else as the conversion veered off into a discourse on corruption and corruptible, original sin, purgatory, etc. I did a Google search on Aerobaptism, Arial Baptism, and Aerob�ptisma, but didn't come up with anything else not already mentioned. romiosini wrote: Has anyone heard of the Arial baptism? The baptism when a baby is fortold to die, and the parent or the godfather (if he's chosen) raisen the baby up 3 times in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. But then if it does survive, the baby can be baptised officially without being said 3 times in the name of the Trinity. Has anyone heard of that? George in Australia wrote: Dear in Christ Romiosini, Yes, arial baptism is an accepted practice, and can be performed by any Orthodox Christian in case of emergency. One of the contemporary Fathers (I can't recall which one right now) was visited by a couple and their newborn child. The Elder held the child and asked the parents what they intended to name the child. He then appeared to play with the infant by raising him three times then handed him back to his parents. He then said to the parents: "You are young, you will have more children". A disciple who witnessed this later asked why the Elder had surrupticiously performed an arial baptism on the infant, and the Elder replied that it was shown to him that it was not God's will that the child would live. I'm not sure how arial baptism is 'regularized' if the child does live, I will have to ask someone. George As an afterthought, I googled "Air Baptism" and came up with this: The Christian Orthodox Association at Brown University said:
As for emergency situations, one Orthodox writer observes:
"The exceptions to water-immersion-baptism are for emergencies. They are baptism of the bed-ridden, martyred baptism and air baptism. The baptism of the bed-ridden is performed by sprinkling the person with holy water....The baptism of a martyred person occurs when he displays unshakable faith at the time of martyrdom, and the desire for baptism has been made known beforehand. The martyred person is then baptized in his own blood. Air baptism is performed on children near death. The child can be baptized in the name of the Holy Trinity even by a layman when a priest cannot be summoned in time" (Fr. George Mastrantonis, A New-Style Catechism). And the only other thing I found was some new age guy saying each era of earth had a different element for baptism--air, then earth, then fire, then water--and he wants to usher us all in to the fifth era of humanity (Jesus is passe afterall and *so* 2,000 years ago) and baptize everyone with ether.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517 |
The question of whether a non-Christian can possibly baptize validly is, oddly enough, a question upon which the two present codes of canon law differ. The Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches require that the person doing the Baptism must be a Christian. The (Latin) Code of Canon Law allows that in an extreme emergency even a non-Christian may do this.
It happens more often than one might think - there are large Jewish hospitals in places in North American, and they routinely teach their staff how to baptize the baby of a Catholic mother in an emergency situation. I should know; my own sisters were baptized in just that manner.
The point here is that the non-Christian is simply acting as an agent for the party who wants the Baptism but is physically incapable of performing it (the mother, almost invariably); the agent has the simple intention of doing whatever it is that the Christians do in this circumstance. That's a minimal intention, but it is sufficient ("to do what the Church does").
Incognitus
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 322 Likes: 5
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 322 Likes: 5 |
So let me just see if this scenario would be possible: Two men on a desert island. Both unbaptized, and in danger of dying at any moment. One of them wishes to be baptized before he dies, the other either also does, or doesn't particularly care. You can never baptize yourself, but could they, although non-christians, baptize eachother? I know it's an unlikely situation but just for the sake of argument...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390 |
Isn't there also a "baptism by desire" theory (at least in the west) which applies to those who have a desire to be baptized but die before they are able to?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,517 |
As has been asked on innumerable occasions, why are some theologians so amazingly fond of desert islands?
Incognitus
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,390 |
Because rainforest islands would present the problem of monkeys!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 166
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 166 |
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic: Dear Filipe,
Yes, in your RC Church, non-Christians may baptize if there is no Christian present and it is the will of the person to be baptized AND if the non-Christian doing the baptizing will baptize according to the form and spirit etc.
That goes on in your RC Church!
Pax Tecum!
Alex This is true but can be tricky as the proper form and intent and it might be hard to find a non-christian to have those requirements going for them, but it is possible no doubt. But we do know for example that Mormon Baptisn is not considered valid even though the form appears to be correct the intent is not the same trinitarian understanding christians use in their understanding when they baptize. So unless its a life or death situation get a christian to baptize you. The catholic church officially only uses priest or ordained deacons for baptism - the laity only baptize in in extreme circumstances and are the exception and not the rule. But in such circumstances one should be encouraged to do so.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 166
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 166 |
Originally posted by Orthodox Catholic: Dear Filipe,
Yes, in your RC Church, non-Christians may baptize if there is no Christian present and it is the will of the person to be baptized AND if the non-Christian doing the baptizing will baptize according to the form and spirit etc.
That goes on in your RC Church!
Pax Tecum!
Alex This is true but can be tricky as the proper form and intent and it might be hard to find a non-christian to have those requirements going for them, but it is possible no doubt. But we do know for example that Mormon Baptisn is not considered valid even though the form appears to be correct the intent is not the same trinitarian understanding christians use in their understanding when they baptize. So unless its a life or death situation get a christian to baptize you. The catholic church prefers to use priest or ordained deacons for baptism - the laity only baptize in in extreme circumstances and are the exception and not the rule. But in such circumstances one should be encouraged to do so.
|
|
|
|
|