0 members (),
2,056
guests, and
147
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,558
Posts417,860
Members6,228
|
Most Online9,745 Jul 5th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735 Likes: 6
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735 Likes: 6 |
Originally posted by RayK: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Zenovia: [b] To All:
Talking about the end times...better to leave it to our great (if not the greatest modern saint), Saint John of Kronstadt.
http://www.stvladimirs.ca/library/stjohn-kronstadt-vision.html
Very interesting symbols. What years did he live? (I do not know anything about him). Obviously he was Russian? His dream - is centered around the fall of Christian Russia (Czarist monarchy) to the Bolshevik Revolution and the eventually fall of Bolshevic (Lenin) to real Communism (Stalin). What is very interesting (and bold) is that this vision displays the top hierarchy of the Russian Orthodox church - as capitulate and cooperate with atheistic forces. Christ is supplanted (within the Russian Orthodox Church) by the anti-Christ. Under the regime of the anti-Christ � only those priest and religious who are sealed by the false prelate and his hierarchy � are allowed to live. While those who maintain the real faith of Christ are martyred. And the false church is complicit with that. The �end of the world� spoken (of toward the end of the vision) is explicitly an end to the worldliness and anti-Christ - with a restoration of the real faith (to the Russian Orthodox hierarchy). The dates are these� 1913-14 (Russia enters WWI which devastates Russian economy) 1917 (the Bolshevik Revolution called the �October Revolution�) 1922 (Lenin weakens and a much worse Stalin begins to rise) 1924 (the end of Bolshevik authority as Stalin has them all killed) 1934 (Stalin become the sole head of all Russia and Communism begins) And so the narration is a chronology of the chain of events threading though these dates. The last date (1934 - Stalin style Communism begins) is not resolved. No new date is given. It is only promised � that there will be an end to the atheists who have taken over the altar of the Russian Church. This vision (which I had not known about before) is a stunning- condemnation of the Patriarch of Moscow - as an anti-Christ - during the years of the Bolshevik and Communist powers. A testament that they were complicit with the death of good priests (not accepting their seals) in the gulags. This seems to me (by the wording and symbols) a private revelation to John. A comfort that �these days will end�. Bit I am not sure if the end indicated was the end of the anti-Christ here on earth (within the Moscow church) or it is meant to indicate that it would end, for John, meaning his own death (John�s). It seems to me (at this time) that the end spoken of would be John�s own death. What year did he die? (I just looked that up = 1908) even before all these things began to take place. Therefore - the �end� spoken of is not John - but it is - the end of the anti-Christ occupying the chair of Moscow. I would have to re-read it to get a sense of ending events - but - I suspect that no indications are given. Leaving it to us to wonder if that chair is still occupied by an anti-Charist or if it has been returned to Christ yet. Now before I get any flak from Russian Orthodox here... Hey!!! I didn�t write the vision - I am only telling you what the vision is about according to its own flow. It was obviously given to John as a preview of events (the rise of the five pointed star of Communism) within Russia and as regards the church. And note that the church is split - the common remaining faithfull and only the top becoming rotten. Again... I don't write 'em - I only read 'em. -ray [/b] Welcome to ROCOR Ray!!!!! 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,301
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,301 |
My heart goes out to the entire Russian Orthodox people. Do you want me to go over John�s vision inch by inch? Or do you already understand it well enough? -ray
-ray
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735 Likes: 6
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735 Likes: 6 |
Originally posted by RayK: [QUOTE]
Do you want me to go over John�s vision inch by inch? Or do you already understand it well enough?
-ray I first read it almost 30 years ago. This is just one of the reasons for ROCOR's existence. Thank God that the trial by fire has ended, and the gold has been purified by the fire of the blood of the New Martyrs of the Bolshevik Yoke! Alexandr
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,301
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,301 |
Daer Slavipodvizhnik:
So... what will happen under reconciliation?
Does the ROCOR then ... submit to the Patriarch of Moscow?
Is it reunion or reconciliation (where both remain serperate but coopperative)?
Just asking.
-ray
-ray
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735 Likes: 6
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,735 Likes: 6 |
Originally posted by RayK: Daer Slavipodvizhnik:
So... what will happen under reconciliation?
Does the ROCOR then ... submit to the Patriarch of Moscow?
Is it reunion or reconciliation (where both remain serperate but coopperative)?
Just asking.
-ray It is reconciliation. The MP has glorified the New Martyrs and repented of complicity with the Godless Ones. ROCOR will be in communion with, but administrativly seperate from the MP. I truly believe that Patriarch Alexei is trying very hard to restore Orthodox unity and to undue the damage done under 70+ years of communist rule. Alexandr
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440 |
Dear Ray, Thank you for telling me what occurred on the dates mentioned. I was quite curious about them. As for the rest of the prophecy, I believe some if not most of it has to do with the Soviet Union. The rest, I can't help but feel has to do with the New Age movement and the belief that all religions are correct. That would include Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, and the new modernized main stream Protestant Churches., or at least the ones within them that believe the Church should be made in their own image. The problem with this prophecy as I see it, is that it can be misinterpreted by fundamentalists into the belief that any move towards Christian unity would automatically be misconstrued as the 'new innovative Church'. The star as I see it is a pentagram. That it is on one's lips means that they will speak New Age. That it is on the right hand means that their works will be New Age, and the star above their elbow means that they will embrace this new innovative religion. That the Anti-Christ is in a temple in Jerusalem, could be taken literally...or not of course. In the case it is meant to be taken literally, then the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem will not be exactly what the Jewish people expect. the 'saviour' within will not be what is expected. That Saint John of Kronstadt said that shortly after the world will end, gives me the impression that the prophecy has not as yet been completed. This of course is my interpretation. As for SAint John of Kronstadt, one must read his book which I believe is titled: My Life in Christ. It is Christian perfection. As father Arseny, a future Russian saint said, had the Russian people followed Saint John, Communism would not have come about. I believe that before a great chatisement comes, God will always send at least one great saint with the hope that the people will 'metanoie', (repent). Thousands did follow Saint John, but I have to assume from the consequences of what followed that it was not enought people. Zenovia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,440 |
P.S. To further express my views on the prophecy of Saint John Kronstadt, I believe that the world will not end, for that would contradict other prophecies. But rather that the world as we know it will end shortly. Now what is it that the boy scouts say: "Be prepared". 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,045
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,045 |
Originally posted by ebed melech: Originally posted by Zenovia: [b] Dear All,
I have a problem with the mockery of these end time theories, and especially of the altar calls of the Baptists and other Evangelicals. ...I don't think we should mock them, but rather be thankful that they exist and because of them, we have not as yet fallen completely into the athieistic and agnostic state existing in most of the post Christian lands.
Zenovia Zenovia,
Let me clarify my intention in telling the story. I shared that not to mock the practice of altar calls, but rather the idea of:
1. having an altar call at a prom 2. showing end time movies at a prom
Of course, the literalistic interpretations of Revelation as portrayed in the movie are laughable, with or without the lumberjack and his handy map.
By and large, I have great respect for the evangelical community and for some of their biblical theology. I count many evangelicals among my friends and family, but very few hold to the nonsense of 6 foot locusts. Actually, not all of evangelicalism is dispensationalist. There is quite the difference between the biblical schools of thought at say a Bob Jones University, Dallas Theological Seminary or Liberty University and say a Fuller Seminary, Gordon-Conwell Seminary or Trinity Evangelical. I find myself as a Catholic far more closely allied with the latter, rather than the former.
Gordo [/b]methinks that there has been a misunderstanding between Zenovia and Ebed Melech. I don't think that is a mockery of altar calls per se as much as the cultural milieu in which they are at times presented. it begs the question: where are you from, Ebed?I note that you are based in New York, but you write like someone, like myself, who has spent the majority of his life in the Bible Belt, whether it be in the South or those parts of the MidWest adjoining Dixie. I don't believe that a lot of you folks understand how folks in the Belt react to their cultural context, and how something as sacred as altar calls, etc. have been rendered totally cheesy by those who have institutionalized, and thus have made such things pedestrian, and to be quite frank: vulgar.Zenovia,gracious lady, I realize that you are from New York, I have lived there and I more than realize and understand the cultural chasm between the two regions, so I don't critize what you have written, as I learned in Hermeneutics: context, context, context. I understand Ebed (if I can call you that, bro)when he speaks well of Evangelical schools. as many of you know, I went to seminary at Temple Baptist, an independent and fundamental institution. while I am quite Orthodox in my faith as an EC (if I was any more Orthodox, I would be wearing payot und a kippah on mein kop)my approach to Christianity is heavily influenced by Evangelical thought, and that is how I express myself on the intellectual level. I am not alone, even in conservative Anglo Catholic circles in the US, it is possible to follow an Anglo Catholic liturgy and hold to Evangelical theology. I am Russian Orthodox in my worship, Eastern in my spirituality, and Evangelical in my mindset. to return to the cultural aspect: many Evangelicals, some of whom are personal friends of mine, are going Orthodox, and there isn't as much as a change as you may think. mainline Protestants are going Latin. Orthodoxy (both EC and canonical Orthodox) and Latin Catholicism attracts more converts from the Bible Belt than outside of it, and the rate of conversion is phenomenal.so again, I can appreciate Ebed's high regard of Evangelical institutions of higher learning. I do not presume to speak for Ebed, but I see that Evangelicals and Orthodox have more in common than they do with liberals, or those Latins who have been following liberal Protestant theology and views of Holy Scripture. (see the various introductory sections of the NAB for examples) but hey, I can appreciate all that Ebed Melech has posted on this thread. Much Love, Jonn
|
|
|
|
|